Mark Walker

Dr. Mark Walker


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2009 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MWMark Walker
Mark Walker
YZYue Zhang
Yue Zhang
SHSonia Heaven
Sonia Heaven
CBCharles Banks
Charles Banks


1 February 2015 in Renewable Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJ.G. Castellanos
J.G. Castellanos
MWMark Walker
Mark Walker
DPD. Poggio
D. Poggio
MPM. Pourkashanian
M. Pourkashanian
WNW. Nimmo
W. Nimmo

29 July 2014 in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WNWilliam J. Nock
William J. Nock
MWMark Walker
Mark Walker
RKRimika Kapoor
Rimika Kapoor
SHSonia Heaven
Sonia Heaven

1 July 2016 in Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DPD. Poggio
D. Poggio
MWMark Walker
Mark Walker
WNW. Nimmo
W. Nimmo
Lin MaLin Ma
Lin Ma
MPM. Pourkashanian
M. Pourkashanian
This work proposes a novel and rigorous substrate characterisation methodology to be used with ADM1 to simulate the anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste. The proposed method uses data from both direct substrate analysis and the methane production from laboratory scale anaerobic digestion experiments and involves assessment of four substrate fractionation models. The models partition the organic matter into a mixture of particulate and soluble fractions with the decision on the most suitable model being made on quality of fit between experimental and simulated data and the uncertainty of the calibrated parameters. The method was tested using samples of domestic green and food waste and using experimental data from both short batch tests and longer semi-continuous trials. The results showed that in general an increased fractionation model complexity led to better fit but with increased uncertainty. When using batch test data the most suitable model for green waste included one particulate and one soluble fraction, whereas for food waste two particulate fractions were needed. With richer semi-continuous datasets, the parameter estimation resulted in less uncertainty therefore allowing the description of the substrate with a more complex model. The resulting substrate characterisations and fractionation models obtained from batch test data, for both waste samples, were used to validate the method using semi-continuous experimental data and showed good prediction of methane production, biogas composition, total and volatile solids, ammonia and alkalinity.