Emergence is a common phenomenon, and it is also a general and important concept in complex dynamic systems like artificial societies. Usually, artificial societies are used for assisting in resolving several complex social issues (e.g., emergency management, intelligent transportation system) with the aid of computer science. The levels of an emergence may have an effect on decisions making, and the occurrence and degree of an emergence are generally perceived by human observers. However, due to the ambiguity and inaccuracy of human observers, to propose a quantitative method to measure emergences in artificial societies is a meaningful and challenging task. This article mainly concentrates upon three kinds of emergences in artificial societies, including emergence of attribution, emergence of behavior, and emergence of structure. Based on information entropy, three metrics have been proposed to measure emergences in a quantitative way. Meanwhile, the correctness of these metrics has been verified through three case studies (the spread of an infectious influenza, a dynamic microblog network, and a flock of birds) with several experimental simulations on the Netlogo platform. These experimental results confirm that these metrics increase with the rising degree of emergences. In addition, this article also has discussed the limitations and extended applications of these metrics.

In recent years, GitHub, the most popular social coding site, has been increasingly employed for managing learning content, sharing knowledge, imparting experience, and requesting and contributing learning resources in a crowdsourced way. We thus refer to this type of e-learning practices in which people perform learning-related tasks with open calls in an online community to gain knowledge or skills in specific areas as crowdsourced learning (CL). To understand this emerging phenomenon in GitHub, we investigate the popularity of the learning projects and learners’ CL activities, first on the extracted GHTorrent learning projects and then on a selected sample of 105 popular learning projects. We then conduct an online survey of 301 learners to qualitatively understand their practices and perceptions of CL in GitHub. Our main findings reveal that the learner’ CL practices show some different characteristics from those of open source development, e.g., the learning projects have very few long-term contributors (less than 5% of all contributors). Moreover, although the learners benefit from conducting personalized learning with the high-quality content and contributions made by the community, they encounter challenges in maintaining initiatives to conduct continuous unsupervised learning and in ensuring the quality of content and contributions. Based on the findings, we discuss the reasons behind the growth of CL and provide implications on the CL platform design.

To encourage developers' volunteer contributions, modern programming question and answer (Q&A) sites like Stack Overflow (SO) employ gamified incentive mechanisms such as reputation and badges. Understanding developers' motivations in the presence of gamification and the relationship between their motivations and behavioral outcomes is crucial for community building and designing good incentive mechanisms. Grounded on self-determination theory, we conducted a survey with 938 developers who participate in SO to understand their participation motivations and incentive perceptions. By connecting the survey responses with the SO data, we quantitatively analyzed how the developers' motivations and satisfaction of needs relate to their effort and contribution quality. Our main findings are as follows: (1) despite the presence of gamified incentive mechanisms, developers are mainly motivated by intrinsic motivation to participate in SO; (2) developers who have strong motivations to gain gamification rewards are associated with higher intrinsic and integrated motivations, while developers with more development experiences are less motivated by the gamified incentives; (3) both extrinsic motivations (in terms of career prospects) and intrinsic motivations (regarding self-improvement and helping others) can motivate developers to make high-quantity and high-quality contributions; and (4) high-level satisfaction of needs for competency and autonomy has a positive effect on developers making high-quantity and high-quality contributions and addressing difficult problems. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for developer motivation and gamification in the crowdsourcing context and for the mechanism design of gamified crowdsourced platforms.

Reusing code snippets from online programming Q&A communities has become a common development practice, in which developers often need to adapt code snippets to their code contexts to satisfy their own programming needs. However, how developers make these code adaptations based on contexts is still unclear. To bridge this gap, we first conduct a semi-structured interview of 21 developers to investigate their adaptation practices and perceived challenges during this process. The result suggests that code snippet adaptation is a challenging and exhausting task for developers, as they should tailor the snippets to guarantee their correctness and quality with laborious work. We also note that developers all resort to their intra-file context to complete adaptations, which motivates us to further study how developers performed context-based adaptations (CAs) in real scenarios. To this end, we conduct a quantitative study on an adaptation dataset comprising 300 code snippet reuse cases with 1,384 adaptations from Stack Overflow to GitHub. For each adaptation, we manually annotate its intention and relationship with the context. Based on our annotated data, we employ frequent itemset mining to obtain four CA patterns from our dataset, including Fortification , Code Wiring , Attribute-ization and Parameterization . Our main findings reveal that: (1) more than half of the code snippet reuse cases include CAs and 23.3% of the adaptations are CAs; (2) more than half of the CAs are corrective adaptations and variable is the primary adapted language construct; (3) attribute is the most frequently utilized context and 88% of the local contexts are within the nearest 10 LOCs; and (4) CAs towards different intentions are repetitive, which are useful for automatic adaptation. Overall, our study provides valuable insights into code snippet adaptation and has important implications for research, practice, and tool design.