Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the standard treatment for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies. Only approximately 25% of siblings are HLA-matched, and thus alternative donors-unrelated or haploidentical-are usually the only options available. This meta-analysis aimed to compare haploidentical HSCT with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and unrelated donor (URD) HSCT. We searched the PubMed and Cochrane databases for pertinent studies indexed between 2008 and 2018. Twenty observational studies (with a total of 1783 haploidentical HSCT recipients and 6077 URD HSCT recipients) were included. Results for overall survival, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and relapse incidence were pooled. Measures of association used were hazard ratios and risk differences. The median age was 51 years for haploidentical transplant recipients and 52 years for URD transplant recipients. Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts were more frequent in the URD transplant recipients (85%) than in the haploidentical transplant recipients (31%). Overall survival was not different between the 2 groups. NRM was lower for haploidentical transplantation. All forms of GVHD (acute grades II-IV and III-IV and moderate, severe, and extensive chronic) were lower with haploidentical donor HSCT. The risk of chronic GVHD was fairly proportional to the differential use of PBSC grafts across studies, however. All included studies were retrospective, representing the major limitation of this meta-analysis. In conclusion, haploidentical HSCT for hematologic malignancies achieved the same overall survival as URD HSCT, with a lower incidence of GVHD and NRM. The increased frequency of PBSC use in the unrelated donor group could partially explain the higher cGVHD rate. Haploidentical transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide should strongly be considered as the first option for adult patients with hematologic malignancies who do not have matched sibling donors in experienced centers. This systematic review has been registered at PROSPERO (65790).

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening disease that can be cured with allogeneic cell transplantation (HCT). Haploidentical donor transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (haplo-PTCy) is an option for patients lacking an HLA-matched donor. We analyzed 87 patients who underwent haplo-PTCy between 2010 and 2019. The median patient age was 14 years (range, 1 to 69 years), most were heavily transfused, and all received previous immunosuppression (25% without antithymocyte globulin). Almost two-thirds (63%) received standard fludarabine (Flu)/cyclophosphamide (Cy) 29/total body irradiation (TBI) 200 cGy conditioning, and the remaining patients received an augmented conditioning: Flu/Cy29/TBI 300-400 (16%), Flu/Cy50/TBI 200 (10%), or Flu/Cy50/TBI 400 (10%). All patients received PTCy-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Most grafts (93%) were bone marrow (BM). The median duration of follow-up was 2 years and 2 months. The median time to neutrophil recovery was 17 days. Primary graft failure occurred in 15% of the patients, and secondary or poor graft function occurred in 5%. The incidences of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 14%, and that of chronic GVHD was 9%. Two-year overall survival and event-free survival (EFS) were 79% and 70%, respectively. EFS was higher for patients who received augmented Flu/Cy/TBI (hazard ratio [HR], .28; P = .02), and those who received higher BM CD34 cell doses (>3.2 × 10E6/kg) (HR, .29; P = .004). The presence of donor-specific antibodies before HSCT was associated with lower EFS (HR, 3.92; P = .01). Graft failure (HR, 7.20; P < .0001) was associated with an elevated risk of death. Cytomegalovirus reactivation was frequent (62%). Haploidentical HCT for SAA is a feasible procedure; outcomes are improved with augmented conditioning regimens and BM grafts with higher CD34 cell doses.

Haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) may be the sole available curative option for several hematologic malignancies. However, the best choice of conditioning regimen and graft source has not been established. This study was conducted to compare myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts with bone marrow (BM) grafts in the haplo-HCT setting with PTCy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing MAC with RIC and PBSC with BM in the haplo-HCT. The search was conducted in PubMed and TRIALS on February 2, 2021, without a date limit. We excluded studies with >30% non-PTCy graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and >30% nonmalignant diseases. We screened 570 abstracts from PubMed and TRIALS and selected 20 for full-text review and 17 for inclusion in the qualitative and quantitative analyses. For PBSC versus BM grafts, we found no difference in overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; P = .61; nPBSC = 1983; nBM = 2124), progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 0.95; P = .52; nPBSC = 2663, nBM = 2769), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free relapse-free survival (GRFS; HR, 1.16; P = .07; nPBSC = 1454; pBM = 1647), or nonrelapse mortality (HR, 1.14; P = .13; nPBSC = 1664; nBM = 1862). Relapse was lower with the use of PBSC grafts (HR, 0.84; P = .001; nPBSC = 2663; nBM = 2769). The rates of acute GVHD (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) were higher with PBSC grafts (aGVHD grade II-IV: HR, 1.67; P < .001; nPBSC = 2663; nBM = 2802; aGVHD grade III-IV: HR, 1.82; P < .001; nPBSC = 1826; nBM = 2000; cGVHD: HR, 1.46; P = .002; nPBSC = 2686; nBM = 2815). Engraftment was higher with PBSC grafts (HR, 1.27; P < .001; nPBSC = 1461; nBM = 1717). Comparing MAC and RIC, the use of MAC was associated with less relapse (HR, 0.70; P < .001; nMAC = 1929; nRIC = 2662), higher nonrelapse mortality (HR, 1.24; P = .002; nMAC = 2016; nRIC = 2790), but better PFS (HR, 0.86; P = .002; nMAC = 1929; nRIC = 2662). There were no differences between the 2 conditioning regimens in OS (HR, .95; P = .32; nMAC = 2123; nRIC = 3155), GRFS (HR, 0.97; P = .67; nMAC = 1182; nRIC = 1330), grade II-IV aGVHD (HR, 1.01; P = .81; nMAC = 2099; nRIC = 3090), or cGVHD (HR, 1.05; P = .44; nMAC=1929; nRIC = 2662). This analysis shows that the use of BM grafts is associated with comparable outcomes as seen with PBSC grafts despite a lower incidence of GVHD and a higher relapse rate. The use of MAC regimens is associated with improved PFS. These results suggest that for fit patients, MAC remains the optimal conditioning regimen in terms of mortality, and that the use of PBSC grafts may further decrease relapse risk and hasten engraftment, provided that further strategies can be incorporated to decrease GVHD. Prospective comparisons are awaited.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation remains one of the main infectious complications following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In this study, we explored the role of anti-CMV antibody titers in HSCT from alternative donors and to compare the risk of CMV reactivation between posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based haploidentical HSCT and antithymocyte globulin-based unrelated donor (URD) HSCT. We included 98 CMV-positive patients, 30 undergoing haploidentical HSCT and 68 undergoing URD HSCT. The majority of patients had a malignant disease (84%), received a myeloablative conditioning regimen (78%), and received a bone marrow graft (90%). The median pretransplantation anti-CMV IgG level was 109 U/mL. With median follow-up of 2.2 years, a total of 72 CMV reactivations occurred in 50 patients. There was no difference in CMV reactivation pattern between haploidentical HSCT recipients and URD HSCT recipients. In multivariable analysis until the first event, the incidence of CMV reactivation was higher in patients with anti-CMV IgG levels >100 U/mL (hazard ratio [HR], 2.38; P = .005) and in patients diagnosed with grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (HR, 10.8; P = .003) after day +50 and lower in patients who received higher doses of CD34 cells (HR, .44; P = .006). In multivariable analysis for recurring events, the incidence of CMV reactivation was higher in patients receiving reduced-intensity conditioning (HR, 1.69: P = .04) and in patients with acute GVHD (HR, 1.88; P = .02), and lower in those who received higher doses of CD34 cells (HR, .55; P = .01). In summary, we have shown that pretransplantation anti-CMV IgG titers are correlated with CMV reactivation risk. More studies are needed to assess how this information can be incorporated in HSCT. The use of high-dose cellular grafts, a modifiable risk factor, also protects against CMV reactivation.

Leonardo Arcuri, Fabio P S Santos, Guilherme Fleury Perini, Nelson Hamerschlak; Fine and Gray or Cox model?, Blood Advances, , bloodadvances.2023012157, https:/