Erick Ricardo Silva

Prof. Dr. Erick Ricardo Silva

Department of OMFS and Periodontology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 June 2018 in Clinical Oral Implants Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YOYuki Omori
Yuki Omori
Erick Ricardo SilvaErick Ricardo Silva
Erick Ricardo Silva
Daniele BotticelliDaniele Botticelli
Daniele Botticelli
Karol Ali Apaza AlccayhuamanKarol Ali Apaza Alccayhuaman
Karol Ali Apaza Alccayhuaman
NLNiklaus P. Lang
Niklaus P. Lang
SXSamuel P. Xavier
Samuel P. Xavier

31 May 2021 in Dentistry Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EGEduardo Pires Godoy
Eduardo Pires Godoy
Karol Ali Apaza AlccayhuamanKarol Ali Apaza Alccayhuaman
Karol Ali Apaza Alccayhuaman
Daniele BotticelliDaniele Botticelli
Daniele Botticelli
Andrea AmaroliAndrea Amaroli
Andrea Amaroli
VBVitor Ferreira Balan
Vitor Ferreira Balan
Samuel Porfirio XavierSamuel Porfirio Xavier
Samuel Porfirio Xavier
Background: Due to the lack of data on bone-to-graft contact (BGC) over time in the various regions within the subantral space of the augmented sinus floor, the present study aimed to evaluate the osteoconductivity of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with granules of different sizes applied in maxillary sinus floor elevation. Methods: A maxillary sinus augmentation was performed bilaterally in 18 rabbits using DBBM with particle dimensions of either 0.125–1.0 mm or 1–2 mm. The antrostomy was covered using a collagen barrier. The animals were euthanized in groups of six after 2, 4, and 8 weeks of healing. MicroCT and histological analyses were performed. Results: After 2 weeks of healing, BGC was 10.9% and 11.9% for the small and large granule sites, respectively. After 8 weeks of healing, the BGC increased to 65% and 62% at the small and large granule sites, respectively. The highest values were located close to the bony walls and the bony window. New bone content developed between 2 and 8 weeks from 7.0% to 27.6% and from 6.1% to 27.6% at the small and large granule sites, respectively. Conclusions: Similar outcomes in osteoconductivity and bone formation were found at both small and large DBBM granule sites.

1 February 2017 in Journal of Oral Implantology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Erick Ricardo SilvaErick Ricardo Silva
Erick Ricardo Silva
EFEmanuela Ferraz
Emanuela Ferraz
ENEvandro Carneiro Martins Neto
Evandro Carneiro Martins Neto
Gabi ChaushuGabi Chaushu
Gabi Chaushu
LCLiat Chaushu
Liat Chaushu
Samuel Porfirio XavierSamuel Porfirio Xavier
Samuel Porfirio Xavier
Fresh frozen bone allografts (FFB) have become an alternative for bone augmentation in the past decades, especially because of the absence of recent reports of disease transmission or immunologic reactions when it is used. The aim of this prospective controlled study is to evaluate volumetric changes of newly created bone following reconstruction of the atrophic posterior mandible. Twenty consecutive patients presenting for reconstruction of posterior mandibular alveolar bone ridge width ≤6.0 mm and/or height ≤6.0 who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. FFB blocks were used. The main outcome variable investigated was bone volume dynamics. Vertical, horizontal, and 3-dimensional bone gain data were measured from computerized tomography scans. The main predictor variable was time evaluated at 3 points: immediately after surgery (T1), at implant placement (T2), and 1 year after functional loading (T3). Secondary outcome parameters evaluated were implant survival, histologic findings, and microtomographic morphometry. The study included 28 hemi-mandibles, 50 FFB bone blocks, and 15 female and 5 male patients (mean age, 51.8 years). Block and implant survival rates were 100% and 96%, respectively, after 31.75 months of follow-up. Vertical and horizontal bone gain at T2 was 5.15 and 6.42 mm, respectively. Volumetric resorption was 31% at T2, followed by an additional 10% reduction at T3. Histologic evaluation showed newly formed vital bone in intimate contact with the remaining FFB. Microtomography revealed 31.8% newly formed bone, 14.5% remaining grafted bone, and 53.7% connective tissue and bone marrow. Thus, FFB blocks may lead to new bone formation and consolidation, with satisfactory volumetric bone maintenance, allowing implant-supported rehabilitation with high success rates.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NMNozomi Maniwa
Nozomi Maniwa
Samuel Porfirio XavierSamuel Porfirio Xavier
Samuel Porfirio Xavier
Sergio Scombatti de SouzaSergio Scombatti de Souza
Sergio Scombatti de Souza
Erick Ricardo SilvaErick Ricardo Silva
Erick Ricardo Silva
Daniele BotticelliDaniele Botticelli
Daniele Botticelli
SBShunsuke Baba
Shunsuke Baba
Background: A comprehensive investigation to associate the use of polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid with bovine bone in maxillary sinus lift procedures in rabbits has not been performed yet. The aim was to evaluate the influence of this novel association on the processes of bone regeneration in maxillary sinus augmentation. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, within-animal model, maxillary sinus augmentation was performed bilaterally in 12 rabbits. Deproteinized bovine bone material (DBBM) was used as filler material. A hyaluronic acid–polynucleotide gel was aggregated at the test site. Histological evaluations were performed after 2 and 10 weeks of healing. Results: After 2 weeks of healing, similar amounts of new bone were observed at both the control (7.7 ± 4.3%) and test sites (8.1 ± 3.8%; p = 0.697). Bone formation was observed predominantly along the osteotomy margins and adjacent sinus walls. After 10 weeks of healing, the total new bone fraction reached 28.0 ± 10.1% at the control sites and 27.3 ± 10.5% at the test sites (p = 0.563). Multiple perforations of the sinus mucosa were observed in both groups when in contact with the biomaterial granules. Conclusion: The present study failed to demonstrate a positive effect on bone formation when incorporating hyaluronic acid–polynucleotide gel (Regenfast) into a xenograft for maxillary sinus augmentation. Additionally, the use of this gel did not mitigate the occurrence of thinned mucosa or reduce the risk of subsequent sinus mucosa perforation.

1 November 2021 in Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLiat Chaushu
Liat Chaushu
Erick Ricardo SilvaErick Ricardo Silva
Erick Ricardo Silva
VBVitor Ferreira Balan
Vitor Ferreira Balan
Gabi ChaushuGabi Chaushu
Gabi Chaushu
Samuel Porfirio XavierSamuel Porfirio Xavier
Samuel Porfirio Xavier

3 June 2021 in Dentistry Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMichael Costa
Michael Costa
Daniele BotticelliDaniele Botticelli
Daniele Botticelli
Ofer MosesOfer Moses
Ofer Moses
YOYuki Omori
Yuki Omori
SFShigeo Fujiwara
Shigeo Fujiwara
Samuel Porfirio XavierSamuel Porfirio Xavier
Samuel Porfirio Xavier
Background: Due to the lack of data comparing the biological behavior of two formulations, granules and paste, of alloplastic graft from microtomographic and histomorphometric points of view, the aim of the present experiment was to compare the histomorphometric and microtomographic healing of two formulations, i.e., granules (MR sites) or paste (MR-inject sites) of an alloplastic graft composed of a combination of beta-tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite used for maxillary sinus lifting. Methods: A sinus lifting procedure was carried out bilaterally in 20 rabbits, and the elevated space was filled with either paste or granules of an alloplastic material. A collagen membrane was placed on the antrostomy and the animals were euthanized after 2 or 10 weeks, 10 animals each group. Microtomographic and histological analyses were performed. Results: Higher proportions of new bone formation were found at the MR, compared to the MR-inject sites both after 2 weeks (2.65 ± 2.89% vs. 0.08 ± 0.12%; p < 0.01) and 10 weeks of healing (34.20 ± 13.86 vs. 23.28 ± 10.35%; p = 0.022). Conclusions: It was concluded that new bone formation was faster in the MR sites, compared to the MR-inject. However, a longer time of healing should be allowed to make final conclusions about the efficiency in bone formation of the paste formulation of the biomaterial used in the present study.