Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is a hypersensitivity disease caused by Aspergillus fumigatus (Af), prevalent in persons with cystic fibrosis (CF) or asthma. In ABPA, Af proteases drive a T-helper cell-2 (Th2)-mediated allergic immune response leading to inflammation that contributes to permanent lung damage. Corticosteroids and antifungals are the mainstays of therapies for ABPA. However, their long-term use has negative sequelae. The treatment of patients with CF (pwCF) has been revolutionized by the efficacy of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy. Pharmacological improvement in CFTR function with highly effective elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) provides unprecedented improvements in lung function and other clinical outcomes of pwCF. The mechanism behind the improvement in patient outcomes is a continued topic of investigation as our understanding of the role of CFTR function evolves. As ETI therapy gains traction in CF management, understanding its potential impact on ABPA, especially on the allergic immune response pathways and Af infection becomes increasingly crucial for optimizing patient outcomes. This literature review aims to examine the extent of these findings and expand our understanding of the already published research focusing on the intersection between ABPA therapeutic approaches in CF and the rapid impact of the evolving CFTR modulator landscape. While our literature search yielded limited reports specifically focusing on the role of CFTR modulator therapy on CF-ABPA, findings from epidemiologic and retrospective studies suggest the potential for CFTR modulator therapies to positively influence pulmonary outcomes by addressing the underlying pathophysiology of CF-ABPA, especially by decreasing inflammatory response and Af colonization. Thus, this review highlights the promising scope of CFTR modulator therapy in decreasing the overall prevalence and incidence of CF-ABPA.

BACKGROUND: Overall outcomes and the escalation rate for home hospital admissions for heart failure (HF) are not known. We report overall outcomes, predict escalation, and describe care provided after escalation among patients admitted to home hospital for HF. METHODS: Our retrospective analysis included all patients admitted for HF to 2 home hospital programs in Massachusetts between February 2020 and October 2022. Escalation of care was defined as transfer to an inpatient hospital setting (emergency department, inpatient medical unit) for at least 1 overnight stay. Unexpected mortality was defined as mortality excluding those who desired to pass away at home on admission or transitioned to hospice. We performed the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression to predict escalation. RESULTS: We included 437 hospitalizations; patients had a median age of 80 (interquartile range, 69–89) years, 58.1% were women, and 64.8% were White. Of the cohort, 29.2% had reduced ejection fraction, 50.9% had chronic kidney disease, and 60.6% had atrial fibrillation. Median admission Get With The Guidelines HF score was 39 (interquartile range, 35–45; 1%–5% predicted inpatient mortality). Escalation occurred in 10.3% of hospitalizations. Thirty-day readmission occurred in 15.1%, 90-day readmission occurred in 33.8%, and 6-month mortality occurred in 11.5%. There was no unexpected mortality during home hospitalization. Patients who experienced escalation had significantly longer median length of stays (19 versus 7.5 days, P <0.001). The most common reason for escalation was progressive renal dysfunction (36.2%). A low mean arterial pressure at the time of admission to home hospital was the most significant predictor of escalation in the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. CONCLUSIONS: About 1 in 10 home hospital patients with HF required escalation; none had unexpected mortality. Patients requiring escalation had longer length of stays. A low mean arterial pressure at the time of admission to home hospital was the most important predictor of escalation of care in the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression model.

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is a severe form of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), with a 5-year survival rate of 40%. Currently, there is no curative therapy for BOS. Preclinical data suggest that pirfenidone, an antifibrotic drug, may benefit small airway fibrosis in HCT-associated BOS. A single-arm, open-label, 56-week phase 1 trial with 56-month extension evaluated pirfenidone’s tolerability, safety, and efficacy in patients with BOS. Efficacy was measured using pulmonary function tests (PFTs), quantitative computed tomography (qCT) scans, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), cGVHD indices, and laboratory tests. Lung function trajectory was assessed by change in regression slopes before and during treatment. Baseline qCT metrics, including percentage normal lung, air trapping, volume change (Jacobian), and heterogeneity of volume change (Jacobian variance), were analyzed by participant response. Of 30 participants, 25 completed the 56-week trial, and 10 continued into the extension. Overall, 63% tolerated the recommended dose without safety concerns. There was significant improvement in the percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P = .00267) when analyzing all participants, and improvement in individual PFT trend for 41.3% of participants. qCT analysis by lobe showed healthier lungs in the upper lobes of responders. Significant improvements were noted in liver function tests, PROs related to physical functioning and shortness of breath, and cGVHD skin indices. These findings indicate that pirfenidone is safe and tolerable in patients with BOS after HCT and may improve lung function and symptoms. Further trials are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of pirfenidone as a treatment for BOS after HCT. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03315741.