Brian LaMoreaux

Dr. Brian LaMoreaux


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 December 2022 in Arthritis & Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JBJohn K. Botson
John K. Botson
KSKenneth Saag
Kenneth Saag
JPJeff Peterson
Jeff Peterson
NPNaval Parikh
Naval Parikh
SOStephen Ong
Stephen Ong
MWMichael E. Weinblatt
Michael E. Weinblatt
Objective: To assess efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of pegloticase plus methotrexate (MTX) versus pegloticase plus placebo cotreatment for uncontrolled gout in a randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial.Methods: This study included adults with uncontrolled gout, defined as serum urate ≥7 mg/dl, oral urate‐lowering therapy failure or intolerance, and presence of ongoing gout symptoms including ≥1 tophus, ≥2 flares in the past 12 months, or gouty arthritis. Key exclusion criteria included MTX contraindication, current immunosuppressant use, G6PDH deficiency, and estimated glomerular filtration rate <40 ml/minute/1.73 m2. Patients were randomized 2:1 to 52 weeks of pegloticase (8 mg biweekly) with either oral MTX (15 mg/week) or placebo. The primary end point was the proportion of treatment responders during month 6 (defined as serum urate <6 mg/dl for ≥80% of visits during weeks 20–24). Efficacy was evaluated in all randomized patients (intent‐to‐treat population), and safety was evaluated in all patients receiving ≥1 blinded MTX or placebo dose.Results: A total of 152 patients were randomized, 100 to receive pegloticase plus MTX, 52 to receive pegloticase plus placebo. Significantly higher treatment response occurred during month 6 in the MTX group versus the placebo group (71.0% [71 of 100 patients] versus 38.5% [20 of 52 patients], respectively; between‐group difference 32.3% [95% confidence interval 16.3%, 48.3%]) (P < 0.0001 for between‐group difference). During the first 6 months of pegloticase plus MTX or pegloticase plus placebo treatment, 78 (81.3%) of 96 MTX patients versus 47 (95.9%) of 49 placebo patients experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE), most commonly gout flare (64 [66.7%] of 96 MTX patients and 34 [69.4%] of 49 placebo patients). Reports of AEs and serious AEs were comparable between groups, but the infusion reaction rate was considerably lower with MTX cotherapy (4.2% [4 of 96 MTX patients, including 1 patient who had anaphylaxis]) than with placebo cotherapy (30.6% [15 of 49 placebo patients, 0 who had anaphylaxis]) (P < 0.001). Antidrug antibody positivity was also lower in the MTX group.Conclusion: MTX cotherapy markedly increased pegloticase response rate over placebo (71.0% versus 38.5%) during month 6 with no new safety signals. These findings verify higher treatment response rate, lower infusion reaction incidence, and lower immunogenicity when pegloticase is coadministered with MTX.

3 October 2020 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PKPuja Khanna
Puja Khanna
Richard J JohnsonRichard J Johnson
Richard J Johnson
BMBrad A Marder
Brad A Marder
BLBrian LaMoreaux
Brian LaMoreaux
AKAda Kumar
Ada Kumar
Gout, an inflammatory arthritis, affects over nine million people in the US with increasing prevalence. Some medical societies do not recommend treating gout unless it is recurrent. While soft tissue urate deposits (tophi), resultant bone erosions, and joint inflammation are frequently recognized in gout, urate crystal deposits in other sites have been thought to be rare. Recent diagnostic testing, such as dual energy computed tomography (DECT), has led to the recognition that urate deposits are not uncommon in other tissues including the vasculature. To understand the potential risks for untreated gout, we reviewed the literature on extra-articular urate deposition documented by autopsy, histopathology, surgery, and radiology, including the heart, blood vessels, kidney, spine, eye, skin, and gastrointestinal system. These studies extend the significance of gout beyond the rheumatologist and emphasize the need for physicians to follow the American College of Rheumatology guidelines to treat subjects with gout to a goal of achieving serum urate <6 mg/dl. Given the growing body of literature on extraarticular urate deposition, further studies and clinical trials are needed to determine the clinical consequences of systemic urate deposition, including if reducing cardiac and vascular urate deposits may provide a survival benefit for this at-risk population.

1 April 2021 in Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RKRobert T. Keenan
Robert T. Keenan
JBJohn K. Botson
John K. Botson
KMKarim R. Masri
Karim R. Masri
LPLissa Padnick-Silver
Lissa Padnick-Silver
BLBrian LaMoreaux
Brian LaMoreaux
MPMichael H. Pillinger
Michael H. Pillinger
Pegloticase is a recombinant PEGylated uricase that converts relatively insoluble urate to highly water-soluble allantoin, which is readily excreted by the kidneys. It is the first and only biologic treatment indicated for refractory or uncontrolled gout. Clinical trials showed a 6-month pegloticase responder rate of 42%, with the non-responder rate largely being attributed to the development of high-titer anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against pegloticase. Immunomodulation attenuates ADA formation to biologics in a number of autoimmune conditions, but their use with pegloticase for uncontrolled gout is less established. This systematic review examined published cases of refractory gout patients treated with immunomodulation in combination with pegloticase. Published cases of immunomodulation with pegloticase were identified in a PubMed search and in abstract databases of major rheumatology society meetings (2012-2020). Duplicate and review articles were excluded, as were those that did not include cases of pegloticase use with immunomodulation. Cases with off-label pegloticase administration schedules were also excluded. Pegloticase response was defined according to each study's specified standard. Ten publications describing 82 cases of pegloticase use in the setting of immunomodulation were identified. Overall pegloticase response rate was 82.9%. Patients co-treated with an individual immunomodulator had the following response rates: methotrexate: 87.5% (35 of 40 patients), mycophenolate mofetil: 86.4% (19 of 22 patients vs. pegloticase monotherapy [placebo]: 40% [4 of 10 patients]), azathioprine: 63.6% (7 of 11 patients), and leflunomide: 66.7% (4 of 6 patients). A single patient was co-treated with cyclosporin and was a responder. The two patients treated with more than one immunomodulator were both responders. Published reports suggest that immunomodulation co-therapy has the potential to markedly improve pegloticase responder rates in patients with uncontrolled gout.

29 June 2023 in ACR Open Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JBJohn K. Botson
John K. Botson
KSKenneth Saag
Kenneth Saag
JPJeff Peterson
Jeff Peterson
KOKatie Obermeyer
Katie Obermeyer
YXYan Xin
Yan Xin
MWMichael E. Weinblatt
Michael E. Weinblatt
Objective: To assess 12‐month safety and efficacy of pegloticase + methotrexate (MTX) versus pegloticase + placebo (PBO) cotherapy in a PBO‐controlled, double‐blind trial (A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multicenter, efficacy and safety study of methotrexate to increase response rates in patients with uncontrolled gout receiving pegloticase [MIRROR RCT]).Methods: Patients with uncontrolled gout (serum urate level [SU] ≥7 mg/dl, oral urate‐lowering therapy failure or intolerance, and presence of one or more gout symptoms [one or more tophi, two or more flares in 12 months, gouty arthropathy]) were randomized 2:1 to receive pegloticase (8‐mg infusion every 2 weeks) with blinded MTX (oral 15 mg/week) or PBO for 52 weeks. Efficacy end points included proportion of responders (SU level <6 mg/dl for ≥80% of examined month) in the intent‐to‐treat population (ITT) (all randomized patients) during month 6 (primary end point), month 9, and month 12; proportion with resolution of one or more tophi (ITT); mean SU reduction (ITT); and time to SU‐monitoring pegloticase discontinuation. Safety was evaluated via adverse event reporting and laboratory values.Results: Month 12 response rate was significantly higher in patients cotreated with MTX (60.0% [60 of 100] vs. 30.8% [16 of 52]; difference: 29.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.2%‐44.9%], P = 0.0003), with fewer SU discontinuations (22.9% [22 of 96] vs. 63.3% [31 of 49]). Complete resolution of one or more tophi occurred in 53.8% (28 of 52) versus 31.0% (9 of 29) of MTX versus PBO patients at week 52 (difference: 22.8% [95% CI: 1.2%‐44.4%], P = 0.048), more than at week 24 (34.6% [18 of 52] vs. 13.8% [4 of 29]). Consistent with observations through month 6, pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity findings showed increased exposure and lower immunogenicity of pegloticase when administered with MTX, with an otherwise similar safety profile. No infusion reactions occurred after 24 weeks.Conclusion: Twelve‐month MIRROR RCT data further support MTX cotherapy with pegloticase. Tophi resolution continued to increase through week 52, suggesting continued therapeutic benefit beyond month 6 for a favorable treatment effect.

22 March 2022 in BioDrugs
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NSNaomi Schlesinger
Naomi Schlesinger
LPLissa Padnick-Silver
Lissa Padnick-Silver
BLBrian LaMoreaux
Brian LaMoreaux
Refractory, or uncontrolled, gout is a chronic, progressive, inflammatory arthropathy resulting from continued urate deposition after failed attempts to lower serum uric acid below the therapeutic threshold with oral urate-lowering therapies such as allopurinol and febuxostat. Recombinant uricase is increasingly being used to treat refractory gout; however, the immunogenicity of uricase-based therapies has limited the use of these biologic therapies. Antidrug antibodies against biologic therapies, including uricase and PEGylated uricase, can lead to loss of urate-lowering response, increased risk of infusion reactions, and subsequent treatment failure. However, co-therapy with an immunomodulator can attenuate antidrug antibody development, potentially increasing the likelihood of sustained urate lowering, therapy course completion, and successful treatment outcomes. This review summarizes evidence surrounding the use of immunomodulation as co-therapy with recombinant uricases.

1 February 2016 in Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BLBrian LaMoreaux
Brian LaMoreaux
FBFatima Barbar-Smiley
Fatima Barbar-Smiley
SAStacy Ardoin
Stacy Ardoin
HMHareth Madhoun
Hareth Madhoun