Aslan Agabubaev

Mr. Aslan Agabubaev


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 June 2025 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
URUlvi Rzazade
Ulvi Rzazade
SDSergey Andreevich Deryabin
Sergey Andreevich Deryabin
ITIgor Temkin
Igor Temkin
AAAslan Agabubaev
Aslan Agabubaev
This article is devoted to the study of the possibilities for improvAzing the quality of energy management systems adopted at open-pit mining enterprises in the Russian Federation. The main idea of the work is to apply stochastic boundary value analysis methods using the production function for individual and integral estimates of the performance of energy-consuming objects when performing various types of technological work. It is shown that mining enterprises are experiencing problems in the field of rational energy consumption due to the lack of strictly formalized ways to determine the frontiers of the efficiency value of the parameter of specific energy consumption (SEC). A justification is given for the need to apply stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) methods and use the Cobb–Douglas production function to account for the nonlinearity and stochasticity of the operating conditions of energy-consuming mining objects. The results of a statistical analysis of the data on the operation of EKG-10 excavators at operating enterprises in Siberia are presented, as well as an assessment of their energy efficiency using the adopted approach based on planning the target value of SEC. The results of computational experiments on constructing an energy efficiency model using the SFA/Cobb–Douglas function for various data segmentation options are presented. Computational experiments have been conducted to compare variants based on the Cobb–Douglas production function and translog function with semi-normal and exponential distribution forms for the same data set. A comparative assessment is given of the approaches to the complex analysis of activities adopted at enterprises and proposed in this study, characterizing potential hidden energy losses in the range from 4.53% to 20.73%.