Breanna Hetland

Dr. Breanna Hetland

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2018 in Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BHBreanna Hetland
Breanna Hetland
NMNatalie McAndrew
Natalie McAndrew
JPJoseph Perazzo
Joseph Perazzo
RHRonald Hickman
Ronald Hickman

15 June 2017 in AACN Advanced Critical Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BHBreanna Hetland
Breanna Hetland
RHRonald Hickman
Ronald Hickman
NMNatalie McAndrew
Natalie McAndrew
BDBarbara Daly
Barbara Daly
Critical care nurses are vital to promoting family engagement in the intensive care unit. However, nurses have varying perceptions about how much family members should be involved. The Questionnaire on Factors That Influence Family Engagement was given to a national sample of 433 critical care nurses. This correlational study explored the impact of nurse and organizational characteristics on barriers and facilitators to family engagement. Study results indicate that (1) nurses were most likely to invite family caregivers to provide simple daily care; (2) age, degree earned, critical care experience, hospital location, unit type, and staffing ratios influenced the scores; and (3) nursing work-flow partially mediated the relationships between the intensive care unit environment and nurses’ attitudes and between patient acuity and nurses’ attitudes. These results help inform nursing leaders on ways to promote nurse support of active family engagement in the intensive care unit.

1 September 2015 in Heart & Lung
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BHBreanna Hetland
Breanna Hetland
RLRuth Lindquist
Ruth Lindquist
LCLinda L. Chlan
Linda L. Chlan

1 April 2023 in Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JGJill L. Guttormson
Jill L. Guttormson
BKBabar Khan
Babar Khan
MBMartin B. Brodsky
Martin B. Brodsky
LCLinda L. Chlan
Linda L. Chlan
MCMartha A. Q. Curley
Martha A. Q. Curley
SWSophia Wang
Sophia Wang
Mechanically ventilated patients experience many adverse symptoms, such as anxiety, thirst, and dyspnea. However, these common symptoms are not included in practice guideline recommendations for routine assessment of mechanically ventilated patients. An American Thoracic Society-sponsored workshop with researchers and clinicians with expertise in critical care and symptom management was convened for a discussion of symptom assessment in mechanically ventilated patients. Members included nurses, physicians, a respiratory therapist, a speech–language pathologist, a critical care pharmacist, and a former intensive care unit patient. This report summarizes existing evidence and consensus among workshop participants regarding 1) symptoms that should be considered for routine assessment of adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation; 2) key symptom assessment principles; 3) strategies that support symptom assessment in nonvocal patients; and 4) areas for future clinical practice development and research. Systematic patient-centered assessment of multiple symptoms has great potential to minimize patient distress and improve the patient experience. A culture shift is necessary to promote ongoing holistic symptom assessment with valid and reliable instruments. This report represents our workgroup consensus on symptom assessment for mechanically ventilated patients. Future work should address how holistic, patient-centered symptom assessment can be embedded into clinical practice.

1 May 2018 in Australian Critical Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BHBreanna Hetland
Breanna Hetland
JGJill Guttormson
Jill Guttormson
MTMary Fran Tracy
Mary Fran Tracy
LCLinda Chlan
Linda Chlan

9 November 2016 in Western Journal of Nursing Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GPGrant Pignatiello
Grant Pignatiello
RHRonald L. Hickman
Ronald L. Hickman
BHBreanna Hetland
Breanna Hetland
Determining effective decision support strategies that enhance quality of end-of-life decision making in the intensive care unit is a research priority. This systematic review identified interventional studies describing the effectiveness of decision support interventions administered to critically ill patients or their surrogate decision makers. We conducted a systematic literature search using PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane. Our search returned 121 articles, 22 of which met the inclusion criteria. The search generated studies with significant heterogeneity in the types of interventions evaluated and varied patient and surrogate decision-maker outcomes, which limited the comparability of the studies. Few studies demonstrated significant improvements in the primary outcomes. In conclusion, there is limited evidence on the effectiveness of end-of-life decision support for critically ill patients and their surrogate decision makers. Additional research is needed to develop and evaluate innovative decision support interventions for end-of-life decision making in the intensive care unit.