Beytullah Yağız

Dr. Beytullah Yağız

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

13 May 2020 in Pediatric Surgery International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BYBeytullah Yağız
Beytullah Yağız
SHSertaç Hancıoğlu
Sertaç Hancıoğlu
ÖBÖzlem Balcı
Özlem Balcı
BDBerat Dilek Demirel
Berat Dilek Demirel
AKAyşe Kaman1
Ayşe Kaman1
IKİbRahim Karaman
İbRahim Karaman

18 March 2021 in Acta Chirurgica Belgica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BDBerat Dilek Demirel
Berat Dilek Demirel
SHSertac Hancıoğlu
Sertac Hancıoğlu
BDBasak Dağdemir
Basak Dağdemir
MBMeltem Ceyhan Bilgici
Meltem Ceyhan Bilgici
BYBeytullah Yağız
Beytullah Yağız
EAEnder Arıtürk
Ender Arıtürk
To evaluate the results of ultrasonography-guided hydrostatic reduction in primary and recurrent ileo-colic intussusception in children.The children (<18 years of age) who were managed for ileo-col...


1 July 2024 in Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BYBeytullah Yağız
Beytullah Yağız
İYİsmail Yağmur
İsmail Yağmur
SHSertaç Hancıoğlu
Sertaç Hancıoğlu
BDBerat Dilek Demirel
Berat Dilek Demirel
AAAhsen Karagözlü Akgül
Ahsen Karagözlü Akgül
SŞSeda Kaynak Şahap
Seda Kaynak Şahap
Background: During the management of patients with hydronephrosis, a possibility of retrocaval ureter (RCU) may emerge indicated by a fish-hook sign or its mimickers. Owing to infrequent incidence, the proper way to diagnose or exclude an RCU is challenging and has not been discussed previously. Methods: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the children who were suspected to have an RCU during management for urinary tract dilation. An RCU may be missed or misdiagnosed owing to rare incidence. Results: The children with urinary tract dilation in whom RCU was considered are enrolled in the study ( n = 13). The demographics of the patients, findings suggesting RCU, evaluation process, management, and final diagnosis are retrospectively evaluated. The final diagnosis of the patients was RCU ( n = 4), ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) ( n = 7), and duplicated collecting system ( n = 2). An RCU was confirmed or excluded by ultrasonography (US) while there was a stent in the ureter in 6 patients and by laparoscopic exploration in the other 7 patients. Four underwent correction for RCU, 7 for UPJO, 1 for reflux, and 1 ureterocele puncture. Conclusion: The fish-hook sign is a rare conflicting radiological finding that can be encountered in imaging studies. This uncommon finding needs confirmation or exclusion of a possible RCU as missed cases manifested after failed pyeloplasty or ureteroneocystostomy were reported. Radiological evaluation (by US or cross-sectional studies) while there is a stent in the ureter is the most satisfactory radiological technique to confirm or exclude an RCU. Alternatively, being aware of a possible RCU and performing a more extensive dissection may be necessary during surgery to confirm or exclude it. If available, laparoscopy may provide this goal in a minimally invasive manner with superior visualization.

18 October 2022 in Pediatric Surgery International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EEErgun Ergun
Ergun Ergun
BYBeytullah Yağız
Beytullah Yağız