Background: Epigenetic changes link medical, social, and environmental factors with cardiovascular and kidney disease and, more recently, with cancer. The mechanistic link between metabolic health and epigenetic changes is only starting to be investigated. In our in vitro and in vivo studies, we performed a broad analysis of the link between hyperinsulinemia and chromatin acetylation; our top “hit” was chromatin opening at H3K9ac. Methods: Building on our published preclinical studies, here, we performed a detailed analysis of the link between insulin resistance, chromatin acetylation, and inflammation using an initial test set of 28 women and validation sets of 245, 22, and 53 women. Results: ChIP-seq identified chromatin acetylation and opening at the genes coding for TNFα and IL6 in insulin-resistant women. Pathway analysis identified inflammatory response genes, NFκB/TNFα-signaling, reactome cytokine signaling, innate immunity, and senescence. Consistent with this finding, flow cytometry identified increased senescent circulating peripheral T-cells. DNA methylation analysis identified evidence of accelerated aging in insulin-resistant vs. metabolically healthy women. Conclusions: This study shows that insulin-resistant women have increased chromatin acetylation/opening, inflammation, and, perhaps, accelerated aging. Given the role that inflammation plays in cancer initiation and progression, these studies provide a potential mechanistic link between insulin resistance and cancer.

Background: Clinical trials should benefit all people. Consequently, the National Cancer Institute expects cancer centers to accrue individuals to clinical trials in proportion to the cancer burden experienced by populations that live in their respective catchment areas; unfortunately, many cancer centers fail to meet this expectation. The person who gives consent for individuals in clinical trials frequently has significant contact with potential trial participants. We hypothesized that the race, ethnicity, and language of the consenter may have an important bearing on whether an individual chooses to participate in a clinical trial. Methods: We used mixed methods to investigate the impact of the socio-cultural background of the consenter on the decision of a potential research subject to participate in a clinical trial. Between 01/2018 and 02/2020, 205 women were approached in the sequential order they appeared in our breast clinic; of the 181 participants who agreed to complete the survey questionnaire, 94 (52%) were Northern European, non-Hispanic White (NE White), and 87 (48%) were Women-of-Color (WOC); this category includes participants who self-identified as Asian, Black, Hispanic/Latina, or Native American. Results: There were statistically significant differences according to the importance of the consenter’s characteristics in the decision to enroll or decline participation in the BCT. No NE White enroller (0%, n = 0) reported that consenter race was important versus 11% (n = 9) of WOC enrollers (p = 0.0009). Similarly, none of the NE White enrollers rated the consenter “looking like people in my community” as important versus 12% (n = 10) of the WOC enrollers (p = 0.0004). Conclusions: We find that consenter race and ethnicity are important for clinical trial diversity. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the generalizability of this finding.