Background/Objectives: Chronic heart failure (CHF) is characterized by complex pathophysiology, leading to increased hospitalizations and mortality. Inflammatory biomarkers such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) provide valuable diagnostic insights. Methods: This study evaluates the prognostic relationship between NLR, PLR, and, in a specific subcohort, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), alongside length of stay (LOS) and 90-day readmission rates in CHF patients, irrespective of heart failure phenotype. A retrospective analysis of 427 CHF admissions (males = 57.84%) was conducted. Results: The mean age of the entire population was 68.48 ± 11.53 years. The average LOS was 8.33 ± 5.26 days, with a readmission rate of 73 visits (17.09%) for 56 patients. The NLR (3.79 ± 3.32) showed a low but positive correlation with the LOS (r = 0.222, p < 0.001). Conversely, the PLR (144.84 ± 83.08) did not demonstrate a significant association with the LOS. The NLR presented a low negative correlation for days until the next admission (r = −0.023, p = 0.048). In a prespecified subanalysis of 323 admissions, the NT-proBNP exhibited a low positive Pearson correlation with the NLR (r = 0.241, p < 0.001) and PLR (r = 0.151, p = 0.006). Conclusions: The impact of the NLR across heart failure phenotypes may suggest the role of systemic inflammation in understanding and managing CHF.

The presence of the Fip1-Like1-platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (FIP1L1–PDGFRα) fusion gene represents a rare cause of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), which is associated with organ damage. The aim of this paper is to emphasize the pivotal role of multimodal diagnostic tools in the accurate diagnosis and management of heart failure (HF) associated with HES. We present the case of a young male patient who was admitted with clinical features of congestive HF and laboratory findings of hypereosinophilia (HE). After hematological evaluation, genetic tests, and ruling out reactive causes of HE, a diagnosis of positive FIP1L1–PDGFRα myeloid leukemia was established. Multimodal cardiac imaging identified biventricular thrombi and cardiac impairment, thereby raising suspicion of Loeffler endocarditis (LE) as the cause of HF; this was later confirmed by a pathological examination. Despite hematological improvement under corticosteroid and imatinib therapy, anticoagulant, and patient-oriented HF treatment, there was further clinical progression and subsequent multiple complications (including embolization), which led to patient death. HF is a severe complication that diminishes the demonstrated effectiveness of imatinib in the advanced phases of Loeffler endocarditis. Therefore, the need for an accurate identification of heart failure etiology in the absence of endomyocardial biopsy is particularly important for ensuring effective treatment.

Background/Objectives: Chronic heart failure (CHF) remains a significant global health burden, with high morbidity, prolonged hospitalizations, and increased mortality. Traditional biomarkers such as NT-proBNP provide prognostic value; however, novel biomarker ratios may enhance risk stratification. This study evaluated the predictive utility of the NT-proBNP-to-albumin ratio (NTAR), red cell distribution width-to-eGFR ratio (RGR), and red cell distribution width-to-fibrinogen ratio (RFR) for hospital length of stay (LOS), extended hospitalization (ELOS), in-hospital mortality, and 6-month all-cause mortality. Methods: A retrospective observational pilot study was conducted on 382 CHF admissions (2022–2024) with comprehensive laboratory assessment. Biomarker performance was assessed through uni- and multivariate logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curve, and Cox proportional hazards stepwise methods of analyses for refining predictive models. Results: NTAR and RGR emerged as significant predictors of hospitalization outcomes. NTAR demonstrated a moderate correlation with prolonged LOS (r = 0.45, p < 0.001) and was an independent predictor of ELOS (AUC = 0.697, OR = 2.438, p < 0.001), outperforming NT-proBNP. Additionally, NTAR significantly predicted in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.768, OR = 4.461, p < 0.001) and 6-month all-cause mortality (AUC = 0.766, OR = 4.185, p < 0.001). RGR was the strongest predictor of in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.785, HR = 2.18, p = 0.005), highlighting its role in renal dysfunction and erythropoietic alterations in CHF. The RFR observed prognostic value was minimal. Conclusions: In our study, NTAR and RGR offered valuable prognostic value underscoring the interplay of cardiac stress, nutritional status, and renal function in CHF prognosis. Further multicenter validation is warranted for these biomarkers.

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the red cell distribution width-to-estimated glomerular filtration rate (RGR) ratio in patients hospitalized with chronic heart failure (CHF) and its potential interaction with NT-proBNP levels. By integrating anemia and renal dysfunction markers, the RGR may provide enhanced predictive insights regarding extended length of hospital stay (ELOS) > 7 days, in-hospital mortality, and 6-month all-cause mortality across specific CHF phenotypes. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center pilot observational study, 627 CHF admissions (January 2022–August 2024) were analyzed. Patients were classified according to the ESC guidelines into heart failure with reduced (HFrEF), mildly reduced (HFmrEF), or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The RGR was calculated as red cell distribution width standard deviation (RDW-SD) divided by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Predictive accuracy was evaluated using logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, and stepwise Cox proportional hazard regression. Results: RGR was significantly higher in HFrEF than in HFpEF (p = 0.042) and predicted ELOS only in HFpEF (AUC = 0.619). In contrast, for in-hospital mortality, RGR achieved excellent discrimination in HFrEF (AUC = 0.945), outperforming RDW and NT-proBNP. In HFmrEF, RDW exhibited the highest predictive power (AUC = 0.826), whereas in HFpEF, NT-proBNP was the strongest predictor (AUC = 0.958), although RGR preserved good discrimination (AUC = 0.746). Across the entire cohort and HF phenotypes, RGR consistently emerged as a significant predictor in univariable analysis. In multivariable models, it improved the significance prognosis especially alongside NT-proBNP in the entire cohort and HFrEF. For 6-month all-cause mortality, RGR surpassed RDW in prediction in all HF phenotypes. Conclusions: The RGR independently predicts prolonged hospitalization, in-hospital, and 6-month mortality in CHF—often outperforming RDW and eGFR and being comparable to NT-proBNP, especially in HFrEF. These findings suggest that RGR may serve as a valuable risk stratification tool in CHF management.

Background/Objectives: Prognostic biomarkers are essential for guiding the clinical management of pulmonary hypertension (PH). This study aimed to assess both established and novel biomarkers—specifically, the red cell distribution width-to-estimated glomerular filtration rate ratio (RGR) and the NT-proBNP-to-albumin ratio (NTAR)—for their ability to predict length of hospital stay (LOS), prolonged LOS (ELOS), in-hospital mortality, and 3-month all-cause mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 275 PH-related hospital regular admissions (148 PAH; 127 CTEPH). Established biomarkers—including serum albumin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), Log NT-proBNP, red cell distribution width (RDW), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)—as well as novel indices (RGR, and NTAR) were examined for their relationships with LOS, ELOS, in-hospital mortality, and 3-month all-cause mortality. Spearman correlation, univariate logistic regression, and ROC analyses evaluated biomarker relationships and predictive performance. Results: Serum albumin independently predicted in-hospital and 3-month mortality in PAH, while in CTEPH, it inversely correlated with LOS and strongly predicted prolonged hospitalization and mortality (AUC = 0.833). NLR had limited correlation with LOS but predicted mortality across both groups. RDW correlated weakly with LOS, significantly predicting prolonged hospitalization (threshold > 52.1 fL) in PAH but not in CTEPH. Preserved renal function (eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m²) was inversely associated with LOS in CTEPH patients, suggesting a protective effect. Additionally, reduced eGFR significantly predicted mortality in both PAH (AUC = 0.701; optimal cut-off ≤ 97.4 mL/min/1.73 m²) and CTEPH (AUC = 0.793; optimal cut-off ≤ 59.2 mL/min/1.73 m²) groups. NTAR (AUC = 0.817) outperformed Log NT-proBNP alone in predicting extended hospitalization and mortality, whereas RGR correlated with LOS and predicted in-hospital mortality. Phenotype-specific analysis demonstrated that inflammatory and renal biomarkers had a stronger prognostic impact in CTEPH. Conclusions: Stratification by PH phenotype highlighted the greater prognostic significance of inflammatory and renal indices, particularly in patients with CTEPH. Incorporating NTAR and RGR into clinical workflows may enhance risk stratification and enable more precisely targeted interventions to improve outcomes in pulmonary hypertension.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are characterized by high morbidity and mortality. We retrospectively analyzed 468 hospital admissions from 80 patients to evaluate the prognostic value of inflammation-based hematologic indices, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). All biomarker–outcome associations were specified a priori as exploratory in this hypothesis-generating design. In PAH, both NPAR and SII were associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.129, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.011–1.261, p = 0.031; OR 1.001, 95% CI 1.000–1.002, p = 0.002), post-discharge mortality (NPAR OR 1.181, 95% CI 1.062–1.313, p = 0.002), and poorer overall survival (log-rank p = 0.002 and p = 0.012, respectively). Higher LMR was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (OR 0.291, 95% CI 0.108–0.790, p = 0.015), while NLR predicted increased in-hospital mortality. In CTEPH, NLR and LMR were the strongest predictors, correlating with worse survival (log-rank p = 0.007 and p = 0.044) and higher post-discharge mortality (NLR OR 1.289, 95% CI 1.029–1.615, p = 0.027). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis suggests the potential value of SII in PAH and the promising performance of NPAR in CTEPH. Inflammation-based hematologic indices, particularly NPAR, SII, and NLR, may provide valuable prognostic information and may serve as practical, non-invasive tools for predicting hospitalization duration and mortality in PAH and CTEPH.