The assessment of left atrial strain (LAS) has emerged as an essential component in the evaluation of cardiac function, especially in pathologies such as heart failure and atrial fibrillation. This narrative review aims to outline the available methods for assessing LAS with a major emphasis on speckle-tracking echocardiography techniques. Other imaging modalities, including cardiac magnetic resonance and cardiac computed tomography, also provide important information on LA dynamics but have disadvantages with respect to cost and availability. The current narrative review underlines basic concepts such as the accurate assessment of LAS and discusses the clinical relevance of LAS by pointing out its significant diagnostic and prognostic role in several cardiovascular conditions. The aim of this article is to discuss the current integration of LAS into clinical practice with a view to further improving patient management and treatment strategies.

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a complex condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Traditional diagnostic and management approaches for PH often face limitations, leading to delays in diagnosis and potentially suboptimal treatment outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI), encompassing machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) offers a transformative approach to PH care. Materials and Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for original studies on AI applications in PH, using predefined keywords. Out of more than 500 initial articles, 45 relevant studies were selected. Risk of bias was evaluated using PROBAST (Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool). Results: This review examines the potential applications of AI in PH, focusing on its role in enhancing diagnosis, disease classification, and prognostication. We discuss how AI-powered analysis of medical data can improve the accuracy and efficiency of detecting PH. Furthermore, we explore the potential of AI in risk stratification, leading to treatment optimization for PH. Conclusions: While acknowledging the existing challenges and limitations and the need for continued exploration and refinement of AI-driven tools, this review highlights the significant promise of AI in revolutionizing PH management to improve patient outcomes.

Athlete’s heart (AH) represents the heart’s remarkable ability to adapt structurally and functionally to prolonged and intensive athletic training. Characterized by increased left ventricular (LV) wall thickness, enlarged cardiac chambers, and augmented cardiac mass, AH typically maintains or enhances systolic and diastolic functions. Despite the positive health implications, these adaptations can obscure the difference between benign physiological changes and early manifestations of cardiac pathologies such as dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM). This article reviews the imaging characteristics of AH across various modalities, emphasizing echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and cardiac computed tomography as primary tools for evaluating cardiac function and distinguishing physiological adaptations from pathological conditions. The findings highlight the need for precise diagnostic criteria and advanced imaging techniques to ensure accurate differentiation, preventing misdiagnosis and its associated risks, such as sudden cardiac death (SCD). Understanding these adaptations and employing the appropriate imaging methods are crucial for athletes’ effective management and health optimization.

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a well-established causal risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), as reported by multiple Mendelian randomization studies and large epidemiological studies. When elevated Lp(a) is combined with other risk factors, most notably elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), a synergistic atherogenic effect has been reported. However, the current literature is conflicting regarding how Lp(a) interacts in the context of controlled LDL-C levels (e.g., <70 mg/dL) and whether reducing LDL-C can modify the atherogenic effect of Lp(a). In some studies, elevated Lp(a) was still significantly associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events, despite controlled levels of LDL-C. In contrast, multiple studies have reported attenuation of the cardiovascular risk mediated by elevated Lp(a) with lower LDL-C levels. Moreover, the relationship between Lp(a) and triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, and very low-density lipoprotein remains unclear. In this literature review, we summarize and discuss the current evidence regarding the interactions between Lp(a) and other lipid molecules, how they contribute to the pathogenesis of CVD, and future perspectives, particularly in the current era where promising targeted Lp(a)-lowering therapies are under development.

Lipoprotein (a) is a complex lipid molecule that has sparked immense interest in recent years, after studies demonstrated its significant association with several cardiovascular conditions. Lp(a) promotes cardiovascular disease through its combined proatherogenic, pro-inflammatory, and prothrombotic effects. While the measurement of Lp(a) has become widely available, effective methods to reduce its concentration are currently limited. However, emerging data from ongoing clinical trials involving antisense oligonucleotides have indicated promising outcomes in effectively reducing Lp(a) concentrations. This may serve as a potential therapeutic target in the management and prevention of myocardial infarction, calcific aortic stenosis, and cerebrovascular accidents. In contrast, the role of Lp(a) in atrial fibrillation, in-stent restenosis, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration remains unclear. This review article aims to thoroughly review the existing literature and provide an updated overview of the evidence surrounding the association of Lp(a) and these cardiovascular diseases. We seek to highlight controversies in the existing literature and offer directions for future investigations to better understand Lp(a)’s precise role in these conditions, while providing a summary of its unique molecular characteristics.

Aortic stenosis (AS), the most common valvular heart disease, is traditionally graded based on several echocardiographic quantitative parameters, such as aortic valve area (AVA), mean pressure gradient (MPG), and peak jet velocity (Vmax). This systematic review evaluates the clinical significance and prognostic implications of discordant high-gradient AS (DHG-AS), a distinct hemodynamic phenotype characterized by elevated MPG despite a preserved AVA (>1.0 cm²). Although often overlooked, DHG-AS presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, as high gradients remain a strong predictor of adverse outcomes despite moderately reduced AVA. Sixty-three studies were included following rigorous selection and quality assessment of the key studies. Prognostic outcomes across five key studies were discrepant: some showed better survival in DHG-AS compared to concordant high-gradient AS (CHG-AS), while others reported similar or worse outcomes. For instance, a retrospective observational study including 3209 patients with AS found higher mortality in CHG-AS (unadjusted HR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1 to 1.7), whereas another retrospective multicenter study including 2724 patients with AS observed worse outcomes in DHG-AS (adjusted HR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.04 to 2.56). These discrepancies may stem from delays in intervention or heterogeneity in study populations. Despite the diagnostic ambiguity, the presence of high gradients warrants careful evaluation, aggressive risk stratification, and timely management. Current guidelines recommend a multimodal approach combining echocardiography, computed tomography (CT) calcium scoring, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) planimetry, and, when needed, catheterization. Anatomic AVA assessment by TEE, CT, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) can improve diagnostic accuracy by directly visualizing valve morphology and planimetry-based AVA, helping to clarify the true severity in discordant cases. However, these modalities are limited by factors such as image quality (especially with TEE), radiation exposure and contrast use (in CT), and availability or contraindications (in CMR). Management remains largely based on CHG-AS protocols, with intervention primarily guided by transvalvular gradient and symptom burden. The variability among the different guidelines in defining severity and therapeutic thresholds highlights the need for tailored approaches in DHG-AS. DHG-AS is clinically relevant and associated with substantial prognostic uncertainty. Timely recognition and individualized treatment could improve outcomes in this complex subgroup.