Background and Objectives Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) antibodies can associate with an astrocytopathy often presenting as a meningoencephalitis. Visual involvement has been reported but scarcely defined. We describe 2 cases of GFAP astrocytopathy with predominant visual symptoms and present a systematic review of the literature. Methods We describe 2 patients with GFAP astrocytopathy from our neurology department. We performed a systematic review of the literature according to PRISMA guidelines, including all patients with this disease and available clinical data, focusing on visual involvement. Results Patient 1 presented with bilateral optic disc edema and severe sudden bilateral loss of vision poorly responsive to therapy. Patient 2 showed bilateral optic disc edema, headache, and mild visual loss with complete recovery after steroids. We screened 275 records and included 84 articles (62 case reports and 22 case series) for a total of 592 patients. Visual involvement was reported in 149/592 (25%), with either clinical symptoms or paraclinical test-restricted abnormalities. Bilateral optic disc edema was found in 80/159 (50%) of patients investigated with fundoscopy, among which 49/80 (61%) were asymptomatic. One hundred (100/592, 17%) reported visual symptoms, often described as blurred vision or transient visual obscurations. Optic neuritis was rare and diagnosed in only 6% of all patients with GFAP astrocytopathy, often without consistent clinical and paraclinical evidence to support the diagnosis. Four patients (including patient 1) manifested a severe, bilateral optic neuritis with poor treatment response. In patients with follow-up information, a relapsing disease course was more frequently observed in those with vs without visual involvement (35% vs 11%, p = 0.0035, OR 3.6 [CI 1.44–8.88]). Discussion Visual system involvement in GFAP astrocytopathy is common and heterogeneous, ranging from asymptomatic bilateral optic disc edema to severe bilateral loss of vision, but optic neuritis is rare. GFAP CSF antibody testing should be considered in patients with encephalitis/meningoencephalitis or myelitis and bilateral optic disc edema, even without visual symptoms, and in patients with severe bilateral optic neuritis, especially when AQP4 antibodies are negative. Visual symptoms might associate with a higher relapse risk and help to identify patients who may require chronic immunosuppression.

The recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and related vaccines have raised several issues. Among them, the potential role of the viral infection (COVID-19) or anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines as causal factors of dysimmune CNS disorders, as well as the safety and efficacy of vaccines in patients affected by such diseases and on immune-active treatments have been analyzed. The aim is to better understand the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection/vaccines with dysimmune CNS diseases by describing 12 cases of multiple sclerosis/myelitis onset or reactivation after exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection/vaccines and reviewing all published case reports or case series in which MS onset or reactivation was temporally associated with either COVID-19 (8 case reports, 3 case series) or anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (13 case reports, 6 case series). All the cases share a temporal association between viral/vaccine exposure and symptoms onset. This finding, together with direct or immune-based mechanisms described both during COVID-19 and MS, claims in favor of a role for SARS-CoV-2 infection/vaccines in unmasking dysimmune CNS disorders. The most common clinical presentations involve the optic nerve, brainstem and spinal cord. The preferential tropism of the virus together with the presence of some host-related genetic/immune factors might predispose to the involvement of specific CNS districts.

Optic neuritis (ON) is the most common cause of vision loss in young adults. It manifests as acute or subacute vision loss, often accompanied by retrobulbar discomfort or pain during eye movements. Typical ON is associated with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and is generally mild and steroid-responsive. Atypical forms are characterized by unusual features, such as prominent optic disc edema, poor treatment response, and bilateral involvement, and they are often associated with autoantibodies against aquaporin-4 (AQP4) or Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein (MOG). However, in some cases, AQP4 and MOG antibodies will return as negative, plunging the clinician into a diagnostic conundrum. AQP4- and MOG-seronegative ON warrants a broad differential diagnosis, including autoantibody-associated, granulomatous, and systemic disorders. These rare forms need to be identified promptly, as their management and prognosis are greatly different. The aim of this review is to describe the possible rarer etiologies of non-MS-related and AQP4- and MOG-IgG-seronegative inflammatory ON and discuss their diagnoses and treatments.

Antibodies to proteolipid protein-1 (PLP1-IgG), a major central myelin protein also expressed in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) as the isoform DM20, have been previously identified mostly in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), with unclear clinical implications. However, most studies relied on nonconformational immunoassays and included few patients with non-MS CNS autoimmune demyelinating disorders (ADDs). We aimed to investigate conformational PLP1-IgG in the whole ADD spectrum. We devised a new live cell-based assay (CBA) for PLP1-IgG and used it to test 2 cohorts (retrospective exploratory, n = 284; prospective validation, n = 824) of patients with ADDs and controls (n = 177). Patients were classified as MS, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSDs), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), and other ADDs. PLP1-IgG-positive samples were tested for IgG subclasses, DM20-IgG, and on rat brain tissue-based assay (TBA). Complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) was assessed on a live CBA and antigen specificity and conformational binding through immunoadsorption/colocalization/fixation experiments. PLP1-IgG were found in 0 of 177 controls and 42 of 1104 patients with ADDs mainly diagnosed as other ADDs (19/42) with frequent myelitis/encephalomyelitis (14/19) and coexisting PNS involvement (13/19). Four of 19 patients with other ADDs fulfilled the seronegative NMOSD criteria. PLP1-IgG were also found in patients with MOGAD (11/42), more frequently with PNS involvement (p = 0.01), and in patients with MS (12/42), more frequently with atypical features (p < 0.001). PLP1-IgG-positive MOGAD had higher EDSS scores (p < 0.001) and PLP1-IgG-positive MS had higher severity scores (MSSS, p < 0.001) compared with those PLP1-IgG-negative. Overall, PLP1-IgG were found in 24.1% of patients with CNS+PNS-ADD, 21.2% with atypical MS, 8.3% with MOGAD, 12.0% with seronegative NMOSD, and 1.4% with typical MS. Their frequency within each diagnostic subgroup was consistent between the exploratory and validation cohorts. PLP1-IgG a) colocalized with their target on CBA-TBA, where their binding was abolished after immunoadsorption and fixation-induced conformational epitope alteration; b) mostly pertained to the IgG1/IgG3 subclass (68.3%) and were able to induce CDC; and c) coreacted with DM20 in all 12 patients with PNS involvement tested. Conformational PLP1-IgG predominantly identify patients with non-MS ADDs. They should be tested mainly in those with CNS + PNS ADD, coherently with DM20-IgG coreactivity. PLP1-IgG could also be investigated as disease modifiers and prognostic markers in MS and MOGAD. Preliminary evidence supports their pathogenic potential.

Single reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) have been reported worldwide during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. While case reports are likely to be biased toward uncommon clinical presentations, systematic assessment of prospective series can highlight the true clinical features and spectrum. In this prospective, observational study, we included all consecutive patients who developed GBS. In patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection as antecedent, the time-gap between the infection and GBS onset had to be ≤30 days. The referral was a neurological University Research Hospital, in the Italian Region more severely involved by the pandemic, and hospitalizing both COVID+ and non-COVID neurological diseases. Clinical, laboratory, cerebrospinal fluid, and electromyographic features of GBS diagnosed between March 2020 and March 2021 were compared to a retrospective series of GBS diagnosed between February 2019 and February 2020 (control population). Nasopharyngeal swab was still positive at GBS onset in 50% of patients. Mild-to-moderate COVID-related pneumonia, as assessed by X-ray (6 patients) or X-ray plus computerized tomography (2 patients) co-occurred in 6 of 10 patients. GBS diagnosed during the pandemic period, including 10 COVID-GBS and 10 non–COVID-GBS, had higher disability on admission (P = .032) compared to the GBS diagnosed between February 2019 and 2020, possibly related to later hospital referral in the pandemic context. Compared to non–COVID-GBS (n = 10) prospectively diagnosed in the same period (March 2020–2021), post–COVID-GBS (n = 10) had a higher disability score on admission (P = .028), lower sum Medical Research Council score (P = .022) and lymphopenia (P = .025), while there were no differences in GBS subtype/variant, severity of peripheral involvement, prognosis and response to treatment. Cerebrospinal fluid search for SARS-CoV-2 RNA and antiganglioside antibodies were negative in all COVID+ patients. Temporal clustering of cases, coinciding with the waves of the pandemic, and concomitant reduction of the incidence of COVID-negative GBSs may indicate a role for SARS-CoV-2 infection in the development of GBS, although the association may simply be related to a bystander effect of systemic inflammation; lack of prevalence of specific GBS subtypes in post–COVID-GBS also support this view. GBS features and prognosis are not substantially different compared to non–COVID-GBS.

In the 2023 diagnostic criteria, supporting clinical/MRI features are required to diagnose myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) in patients at high risk of false MOG-IgG positivity (low/unavailable titer, cerebrospinal fluid-restricted), to help differentiation from multiple sclerosis (MS). However, overlap is possible and determining the frequency of the MOGAD supporting features at MS onset may help prevent misdiagnosis. We assessed the frequency of the MOGAD supporting features and potential risk of misdiagnosis at first attack of MS/clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). In this observational study, we retrospectively identified consecutive patients hospitalized between 2021 and 2024 at 2 Italian centers, with: (1) relapsing-remitting MS/CIS, and (2) first attack MRI available. The frequency of the MOGAD supporting features was assessed at MS/CIS presentation, and potential risk of misdiagnosis determined based on the probability of concurrent false MOG-IgG positivity. Other clinical-MRI features typical of MOGAD but not included in the 2023 diagnostic criteria were also evaluated. A total of 244 patients with MS/CIS were included (median age, 34 [range, 13-78] years; 66% were female). Overall, 65/244 (27%) patients with MS/CIS showed at least 1 MOGAD supporting feature during the presenting attack. "Central cord lesion" (27/82 [33%]) and "deep gray nuclei involvement" (24/86 [28%]) were more represented than other supporting features (0%-7%); p < 0.001. MOG-IgG was tested in 207/244 (85%) patients, showing false positivity in 3 (1.4%) patients. The combined probability of detecting a false MOG-IgG positivity and meeting 1 of the MOGAD supporting features was 0.4%. Among other typical MOGAD features not included in the diagnostic criteria, the following had a 0% frequency at MS/CIS presentation: (1) encephalopathy, (2) marked CSF pleocytosis (>50 cells/mm³), (3) wheelchair need during myelitis, and (4) MRI T2-lesion resolution postattack. Although the MOGAD supporting features can be met in one-fourth of patients at MS/CIS presentation, the risk of misdiagnosis in similar unselected cohorts remains low. Future refinements of the MOGAD supporting features should take into account their relative frequency in MS/CIS and possible integration with additional clinical-MRI features that are more specific for MOGAD.