Gastric cancer is one of the most common worldwide types of cancer. It is a multifactorial disease and both environmental and genetic factors play an important role in its etiology. Evaluation of the relative expression level of NFKB2 gene in two groups of patients: peptic ulcer and gastric cancer and its role in the pathomechanism of these diseases was the aim of this study. RNA was isolated from: 79 samples of peptic ulcer, 22 gastric cancer and 11 control tissue. The real-time PCR technique was used to study the expression of NFKB2 gene. The relative expression level of NFKB2 gene was a variable in all three studied groups. The relative NFKB2 gene expression depends on the type of a disease. Peptic ulcer cases showed the increased relative NFKB2 gene expression to control group (p = 0.0000). Cancer cases presented decreased relative NFKB2 gene expression to normal stomach tissue (p = 0.0183). There are statistically important differences in the investigated gene expression between peptic ulcer, where the expression level is higher comparing to gastric cancer and control tissue which confirmed that such an activation is connected with an inflammatory process. The relative expression level of NFKB2 is decreased in cancer cases as opposed to control tissue and peptic ulcer cases which could suggest that during carcinogenesis of gastric cancer inhibition of NF-kB pathway takes place which could be a promising factor for patients.
The global scope and scale of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic led to huge amounts of important data from clinical observations and experimental analyses being collected, in particular, regarding the long-term impact of COVID-19 on lung tissue. Visible changes in lung tissue mainly relate to the destruction of the alveolar architecture, dense cellularity, and pulmonary fibrosis with myofibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition. These changes are the result of infection, mainly with virus variants from the first pandemic waves (Alpha to Delta). In addition, proper regulation of immune responses to pathogenic viral stimuli is critical for the control of and recovery from tissue/organ damage, including in the lungs. We can distinguish three main processes in the lungs during SARS-CoV-2 infection: damage or deficiency of the pulmonary surfactant, coagulation processes, and fibrosis. Understanding the molecular basis of these processes is extremely important in the context of elucidating all pathologies occurring after virus entry. In the present review, data on the abovementioned three biochemical processes that lead to pathological changes are gathered together and discussed. Systematization of the knowledge is necessary to explore the three key pathways in lung tissue after SARS-CoV-2 virus infection as a result of a prolonged and intense inflammatory process in the context of pulmonary fibrosis, hemostatic disorders, and disturbances in the structure and/or metabolism of the surfactant. Despite the fact that the new Omicron variant does not affect the lungs as much as the previous variants, we cannot ignore the fact that other new mutations and emerging variants will not cause serious damage to the lung tissue. In the future, this review will be helpful to stratify the risk of serious complications in patients, to improve COVID-19 treatment outcomes, and to select those who may develop complications before clinical manifestation.
Members of the activator protein 2 (AP-2) transcription factor (TF) family are known to play a role in both physiological processes and cancer development. The family comprises five DNA-binding proteins encoded by the TFAP2A to TFAP2E genes. Numerous scientific reports describe differential expression of these TF and their genes in various types of cancer, identifying among them a potential oncogene or suppressor like TFAP2A or TFAP2C. Other reports suggest their influence on disease development and progression, as well as response to treatment. Not all members of this AP-2 family have been comprehensively studied thus far. The aim of the present article is to gather and discuss knowledge available in bioinformatics databases regarding all five members of this family and to differentiate them in relation to the two most common lung cancer subtypes: adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). In addition, to assess the difference in levels depending on a number of clinicopathological factors, the impact on patient survival and interactions with tumor-infiltrating immune cells. This article may help to identify the target for further original research that may contribute to the discovery of new diagnostic biomarkers and define the molecular differences between LUAD and LUSC, which may affect the therapy effectiveness improvement and longer survival.
1 November 2024 in Translational Lung Cancer Research
Background: Despite the decrease of morbidity rate of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in recent years, it is still a cancer with poor prognosis. Lung cancers (LCs) are usually diagnosed at a late stage of the disease due to non-specific clinical symptoms. Proper regulation of carnitine levels is important in the context of development and increased risk of cancer cells proliferation. The expression profiles and clinical value of SLC family members in LC remain largely unexplored. The aim of the study was the assessment of SLC22A16, SLC22A5 and SLC6A14 mRNA expression level among patients suffering from NSCLC. The obtained results were compared with the clinical and the pathological features of NSCLC patients. Methods: Through reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and bioinformatics studies, the evaluation of carnitine transporting genes (SLC22A16, SLC22A5 and SLC6A14) mRNA levels was performed in order to elucidate their connection to clinical features of patients and influence on overall survival (OS). Results: The analysis showed a significant difference for the SLC22A5 gene of NSCLC patients and for SLC6A14 and SLC22A5 genes in LUSC patients in terms of sex (P=0.002, P=0.02 and P=0.001, respectively) and in terms of tobacco smoking (P=0.04). Analysis also revealed a significant negative correlation for SLC22A5 and SLC22A16 genes expression level in the lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) subtype with standardized uptake value (SUV) (r=−0.40, P=0.02 and r=−0.43, P=0.04). The significant downregulation of gene expression compared to normal adjacent tissue was observed for SLC22A5 in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) and for SLC6A14 in both LUAD and LUSC subtypes. The effect of the SLC22A5, SLC22A16 and SLC6A14 gene expression at the time of diagnosis on the OS time of LC patients revealed that lower expression correlated with a shorter 5 years OS (all P values <0.01). The effects were distinct after division for LUAD and LUSC subtypes. Conclusions: The expression levels of genes encoding carnitine transporters are diverse, hinting at a potentially altered carnitine metabolism in LC patients. Notably, this variance is not uniform and exhibits specificity across LC subtypes, with marked distinctions between LUAD and LUSC. The correlation between gene expression levels and OS of patients underlines the prognostic significance of SLC genes within these cancer subtypes.
CEBPA and c-MYC genes belong to TF and play an essential role in hematologic malignancies development. Furthermore, these genes also co-regulate with RUNX1 and lead to bone marrow differentiation and may contribute to the leukemic transformation. Understanding the function and full characteristics of selected genes in the group of patients with AML can be helpful in assessing prognosis, and their usefulness as prognostic factors can be revealed. The aim of the study was to evaluate CEBPA and c-MYC mRNA expression level and to seek their association with demographical and clinical features of AML patients such as: age, gender, FAB classification, mortality or leukemia cell karyotype. Obtained results were also correlated with the expression level of the RUNX gene family. To assess of relative gene expression level the qPCR method was used. The expression levels of CEBPA and c-MYC gene varied among patients. Neither CEBPA nor c-MYC expression levels differed significantly between women and men (p=0.8325 and p=0.1698, respectively). No statistically significant correlation between age at the time of diagnosis and expression of CEBPA (p=0.4314) or c-MYC (p=0.9524) was stated. There were no significant associations between relative CEBPA (p=0.4247) or c-MYC (p=0.4655) expression level and FAB subtype and mortality among the enrolled patients (p=0.5858 and p=0.8437, respectively). However, it was observed that c-MYC and RUNX1 expression levels were significantly positively correlated (rS=0.328, p=0.0411). Overall, AML pathogenesis involves a complex interaction among CEBPA, c-MYC and RUNX family genes.
Gastrointestinal cancers account for over a quarter of all cancer cases and are associated with poor prognosis and high mortality rates. The IKK complex (the canonical I kappa B kinase), comprising the CHUK, IKBKB, and IKBKG genes, plays a crucial role in activating the NF-kB signaling pathway. This study aimed to analyze publicly available bioinformatics data to elucidate the oncogenic role of IKK genes in selected gastrointestinal cancers. Our findings reveal that IKBKB and IKBKG are significantly upregulated in all examined cancers, while CHUK is upregulated in esophageal carcinoma and stomach adenocarcinoma. Additionally, the expression of IKK genes varies with histological grade and nodal metastases. For instance, in stomach adenocarcinoma, CHUK and IKBKB are upregulated in higher histological grades and greater lymph node infiltration. Lower expression levels of CHUK, IKBKB, and IKBKG in stomach adenocarcinoma and IKBKB in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma correlate with shorter overall survival. Conversely, in esophageal adenocarcinoma, reduced IKBKG expression is linked to longer overall survival, while higher IKBKB expression in colon adenocarcinoma is associated with longer overall survival. Given the significant role of IKK genes in the development and progression of selected gastrointestinal cancers, they hold potential as prognostic markers and therapeutic targets, offering valuable insights for clinical practice.