Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of in situ postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of primary traumatic extra‐axial hemorrhage.Materials and Methods: Thirty forensic neurotrauma cases and 10 nontraumatic controls who underwent both in situ postmortem cranial MSCT and MR imaging before autopsy were retrospectively reviewed. Both imaging modalities were analyzed in view of their accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity concerning the detection of extra‐axial hemorrhage. Statistical significance was calculated using the McNemar test. κ values for interobserver agreement were calculated for extra‐axial hemorrhage types and to quantify the agreement between both modalities as well as MRI, CT, and forensics, respectively.Results: Analysis of the detection of hemorrhagic localizations showed an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 89%, 82%, and 92% using CT, and 90%, 83%, and 94% using MRI, respectively. MRI was more sensitive than CT in the detection of subarachnoid hemorrhagic localizations (P = 0.001), whereas no significant difference resulted from the detection of epidural and subdural hemorrhagic findings (P = 0.248 and P = 0.104, respectively). Interobserver agreement for all extra‐axial hemorrhage types was substantial (CT κ = 0.76; MRI κ = 0.77). The agreement of both modalitites was almost perfect (readers 1 and 2 κ = 0.88).Conclusion: CT and MRI are of comparable potential as forensic diagnostic tools for traumatic extra‐axial hemorrhage. Not only of forensic, but also of clinical interest is the observation that most thin blood layers escape the radiological evaluation. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:823–836.

Background— The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and radiological outcome of acute stroke patients who had no vessel occlusion on arteriography and to define predictors of clinical outcome. Methods— We analyzed clinical and radiological data of stroke patients whose arteriography performed within 6 hours of symptom onset did not visualize any vessel occlusion. Results— Twenty-eight of 283 consecutive patients (10%) who underwent arteriography with the intention to perform intraarterial thrombolysis did not show any arterial occlusion. Their median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 7. Time from symptom onset to arteriography ranged from 115 to 315 minutes; on average, it was 226 minutes. Presumed stroke cause was cardiac embolism in 11 patients (39%), small artery disease in 6 (21%), coronary angiography in 1 (4%), and undetermined in 10 patients (36%). After 3 months, modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) was ≤2 in 21 patients (75%), indicating a favorable outcome. Six patients (21%) had a poor outcome (mRS 3 or 4) and 1 patient (4%) had a myocardial infarction and died. Twenty-seven patients had follow-up brain imaging. It was normal in 5, showed a lacunar lesion in 8, a striatocapsular infarct in 2, a small or medium-sized anterior circulation infarct in 6, multiple small anterior circulation infarcts in 2, and multiple posterior circulation infarcts in 4. No predictors of clinical outcome were identified. Conclusions— Most acute stroke patients with normal early arteriography show infarcts on brain imaging; however, clinical outcome is usually favorable.

Background: The endovascular approach has emerged as standard therapy for many intracranial aneurysms (IAs) to prevent hemorrhage, yet its long-term durability varies considerably. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an initially deliberate endovascular approach regarding IA hemorrhage rates over a long-term follow-up period. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included all consecutive patients with endovascularly treated IAs who presented between January 2008 and December 2020 with a follow-up of at least 12 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with long-term IA hemorrhage rates and reperfusion. The secondary endpoint was treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Independent risk factors for IA reperfusion over the long term were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Results: Endovascular treatment was the therapy of choice for 333 patients with IAs, among whom 188 (57%) experienced rupture upon presentation. Complete coiling (Raymond I) was noted in 162 (49%) of the patients, with primary supportive devices being used in 51 (15%) patients. After a median (±SD) follow-up time of 34 ± 41 months (range 12–265 months), IA reperfusion was noted in 158 (47%), necessitating retreatment in 105 (32%) of the patients. Over the long term, hemorrhage was noted in four (1%) patients. Multivariate analysis revealed aneurysmal multilobarity (HR 1.8, 95%CI 1.2–2.7; p = 0.004) and a patient age of ≥50 years (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1–2.5, p = 0.01) as independent predictors of reperfusion over time. Intervention-related morbidity was noted in 16 (4.8%) patients, namely, thrombosis formation and contrast extravasation in 8 (2.4%) patients each, while no intervention-induced mortality was observed. Conclusion: In the long term, the hemorrhage rate in patients with IA with an initially more conservative endovascular approach is low. Therefore, a deliberate endovascular treatment approach might be justified.

(1) Background: Most intracranial aneurysms (IAs) can be treated either with microsurgical clipping or endovascular techniques. In a few cases, simultaneous treatment utilizing both modalities in a hybrid operation room may be favorable. This study analyzes the indication and benefits of a true hybrid approach (tHA) that combines simultaneous endovascular and microsurgical procedures for treatment of IAs in one session. (2) Methods: All patients receiving a true hybrid procedure between 2010 and 2022 in our institution were included. Demographic characteristics, neurological symptoms, pre-interventional treatments, angiographic findings, and postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes were analyzed. Results are discussed in the light of a systematic literature review on reported true hybrid procedures for IA treatment. (3) Results: In total, 10 tHAs were performed. Of these, coiling and concomitant decompressive craniectomy or hematoma evacuation was performed on six occasions. In two patients, multiple IAs were treated with different modalities during the same procedure. In two patients, intraoperative conditions did not allow for complete IA clipping, and the remnant was coiled in the same session. The review of the literature revealed nine papers comprising 58 IAs treated with a tHA. (4) Conclusions: The need for a tHA for IA treatment is rare and limited to highly selective cases. In our experience, tHAs have been most valuable in an emergency setting concerning ruptured IAs. Furthermore, tHAs may also be considered in patients with multiple aneurysms in different vascular territories.