Giovanni Malanchini

Dr. Giovanni Malanchini

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2021 in Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JCJames Coromilas
James Coromilas
SKStephanie Kochav
Stephanie Kochav
IGIsaac Goldenthal
Isaac Goldenthal
ABAngelo Biviano
Angelo Biviano
HGHasan Garan
Hasan Garan
EWElaine Y. Wan
Elaine Y. Wan
Background - COVID-19 has led to over 1 million deaths worldwide and has been associated with cardiac complications including cardiac arrhythmias. The incidence and pathophysiology of these manifestations remain elusive. In this worldwide survey of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who developed cardiac arrhythmias, we describe clinical characteristics associated with various arrhythmias, as well as global differences in modulations of routine electrophysiology practice during the pandemic. Methods - We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection worldwide with and without incident cardiac arrhythmias. Patients with documented atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), non-sustained or sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), atrioventricular block (AVB), or marked sinus bradycardia (HR<40bpm) were classified as having arrhythmia. De-identified data was provided by each institution and analyzed. Results - Data was collected for 4,526 patients across 4 continents and 12 countries, 827 of whom had an arrhythmia. Cardiac comorbidities were common in patients with arrhythmia: 69% had hypertension, 42% diabetes mellitus, 30% had heart failure and 24% coronary artery disease. Most had no prior history of arrhythmia. Of those who did develop an arrhythmia, the majority (81.8%) developed atrial arrhythmias, 20.7% developed ventricular arrhythmias, and 22.6% had bradyarrhythmia. Regional differences suggested a lower incidence of AF in Asia compared to other continents (34% vs. 63%). Most patients in in North America and Europe received hydroxychloroquine, though the frequency of hydroxychloroquine therapy was constant across arrhythmia types. Forty-three percent of patients who developed arrhythmia were mechanically ventilated and 51% survived to hospital discharge. Many institutions reported drastic decreases in electrophysiology procedures performed. Conclusions - Cardiac arrhythmias are common and associated with high morbidity and mortality among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection. There were significant regional variations in the types of arrhythmias and treatment approaches.

1 October 2020 in Journal of Cardiac Failure
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GMGiovanni Malanchini
Giovanni Malanchini
MMMaurizio Malacrida
Maurizio Malacrida
PFPaola Ferrari
Paola Ferrari
CLCristina Leidi
Cristina Leidi
GFGabriele Ferrari
Gabriele Ferrari
PFPaolo de Filippo
Paolo de Filippo

16 February 2021 in Journal of Arrhythmia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GMGiovanni Malanchini
Giovanni Malanchini
PFP. Ferrari
P. Ferrari
CLC. Leidi
C. Leidi
GFG. Ferrari
G. Ferrari
MRM. Racheli
M. Racheli
PFP. De Filippo
P. De Filippo
Background: Coronavirus Disease‐2019 (COVID‐19) has been associated with myocardial injury and higher risk of arrhythmic complications. However, no reports are available about the effect of the ongoing pandemic on arrhythmias in patients at risk.Objective: To describe the effect of COVID‐19 pandemic on arrhythmic burden among high‐risk patients.Methods: This is a cross‐sectional study on the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) during the pandemic outbreak (study period), compared to the same timeframe in 2019 (reference period). Inclusion criteria were age (>18 years) and having an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD).Results: Among 455 patients enrolled (mean age 64.9 ± 15.7 years; 25.1% females and 39.6% with CRTD), in the study period, 45 (9.9%) patients experienced a total of 86 VA; 8 patients (1.7%) required antitachycardia‐pacing (ATP) and 6 (1.3%) at least one shock. In the reference period, a total of 69 events occurred in 36 patients (7.9%). Six patients (1.3%) required ATP and three (0.7%) at least one shock. The number of patients that suffered from any arrhythmic events in the study period (9.9% vs 7.9%) did not significantly differ from the reference period (χ2 = 1.09, P = .29). The main predictor of VA during the COVID‐19 pandemic was the previous history of any ICD therapy (OR = 3.84, P < .001).Conclusions: No evidence of an increase of arrhythmic burden was found during the COVID‐19 pandemic among patients with an ICD.

11 February 2021 in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PFPaolo De Filippo
Paolo De Filippo
GMGiovanni Malanchini
Giovanni Malanchini
CLCristina Leidi
Cristina Leidi
MRMarco Racheli
Marco Racheli
GFGabriele Ferrari
Gabriele Ferrari
PFPaola Ferrari
Paola Ferrari

26 April 2025 in International Journal of Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GMGiovanni Malanchini
Giovanni Malanchini
ECEduardo Celentano
Eduardo Celentano
ACAntonio Curnis
Antonio Curnis
GRGiovanni Rovaris
Giovanni Rovaris
MBMauro Biffi
Mauro Biffi
MMMassimiliano Marini
Massimiliano Marini

29 November 2018 in Echocardiography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CBCarla Bonanomi
Carla Bonanomi
EGElisa Gherbesi
Elisa Gherbesi
ACAnna Maria Colli
Anna Maria Colli
GMGiovanni Malanchini
Giovanni Malanchini
FLFederico Lombardi
Federico Lombardi