Docetaxel has immunostimulatory effects that may promote an immunoresponsive prostate tumour microenvironment, providing a rationale for combination with nivolumab (programmed death-1 inhibitor) for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In the non-randomised, multicohort, global phase II CheckMate 9KD trial, 84 patients with chemotherapy-naive mCRPC, ongoing androgen deprivation therapy and ≤2 prior novel hormonal therapies (NHTs) received nivolumab 360 mg and docetaxel 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks with prednisone 5 mg twice daily (≤10 cycles) and then nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks (≤2 years). The co-primary end-points were objective response rate (ORR) and prostate-specific antigen response rate (PSA₅₀-RR; ≥50% decrease from baseline). The confirmed ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 40.0% (25.7-55.7), and the confirmed PSA₅₀-RR (95% CI) was 46.9% (35.7-58.3). The median (95% CI) radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) were 9.0 (8.0-11.6) and 18.2 (14.6-20.7) months, respectively. In subpopulations with versus without prior NHT, the ORR was 38.7% versus 42.9%, the PSA₅₀-RR was 39.6% versus 60.7%, the median rPFS was 8.5 versus 12.0 months and the median OS was 16.2 months versus not reached. Homologous recombination deficiency status or tumour mutational burden did not appear to impact efficacy. The most common any-grade and grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (39.3%) and neutropenia (16.7%), respectively. Three treatment-related deaths occurred (1 pneumonitis related to nivolumab; 2 pneumonias related to docetaxel). Nivolumab plus docetaxel has clinical activity in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC. Safety was consistent with the individual components. These results support further investigation in the ongoing phase III CheckMate 7DX trial. CLINICALTRIALS. NCT03338790.

Patients with solid organ transplant (SOT) and solid tumors are usually excluded from clinical trials testing immune checkpoint blockers (ICB). As transplant rates are increasing, we aimed to evaluate ICB outcomes in this population, with a special focus on lung cancer. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study collecting real data of ICB use in patients with SOT and solid tumors. Clinical data and treatment outcomes were assessed by using retrospective medical chart reviews in every participating center. Study endpoints were: overall response rate (ORR), 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events. From August 2016 to October 2022, 31 patients with SOT (98% kidney) and solid tumors were identified (36.0% lung cancer, 19.4% melanoma, 13.0% genitourinary cancer, 6.5% gastrointestinal cancer). Programmed death-ligand 1 expression was positive in 29% of tumors. Median age was 61 years, 69% were males, and 71% received ICB as first-line treatment. In the whole cohort the ORR was 45.2%, with a 6-month PFS of 56.8%. In the lung cancer cohort, the ORR was 45.5%, with a 6-month PFS of 32.7%, and median overall survival of 4.6 months. The grade 3 immune-related adverse events rate leading to ICB discontinuation was 12.9%. Allograft rejection rate was 25.8%, and risk of rejection was similar regardless of the type of ICB strategy (monotherapy or combination, 28% versus 33%, P = 1.0) or response to ICB treatment. ICB could be considered a feasible option for SOT recipients with some advanced solid malignancies and no alternative therapeutic options. Due to the risk of allograft rejection, multidisciplinary teams should be involved before ICB therapy.

La secuenciación de nueva generación (NGS) ha revolucionado el diagnóstico molecular del cáncer de pulmón. A pesar que el tejido tumoral ha sido históricamente el bioespecimen estándar, éste tiene algunas limitaciones. La biopsia líquida representa una alternativa no invasiva, práctica y reproducible para la genotipificación del cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas (CPCNP). Se presenta la caracterización molecular por NGS en plasma, descripción de alteraciones moleculares en genes potencialmente accionables y genes de potencial origen germinal y variantes potencialmente involucradas en el proceso de hematopoyesis clonal. Análisis retrospectivo, observacional, multicéntrico de cohorte de pacientes con diagnóstico de CPCNP no escamoso avanzado de 5 hospitales universitarios de Argentina a los que se les realizó biopsia líquida (FoundationLiquidCDx) entre junio y diciembre 2020. Se realizó la caracterización de oncogenicidad y accionabilidad según OncoKB, COSMIC y VarSome. Se incluyeron 52 pacientes; 43 muestras al diagnóstico y 9 a la progresión. La mediana de carga mutacional tumoral fue 3 mut/mb [0-172] en 39 muestras evaluables; inestabilidad microsatelital en 1 de 3 muestras evaluables. Se identificaron 254 alteraciones moleculares en 80 genes (n=50) y 33 alteraciones en 13 genes potencialmente accionables en el 49% de los pacientes (21/43) siendo las más frecuentes: KRAS 18.6% (8/43), NF1 11.6% (5/43) y EGFR 9.3% (4/43). Se identificaron 13 alteraciones con valor de frecuencia alélica > 40% en genes de potencial origen germinal (BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, CSF3R y CHEK2). Este análisis aporta una descripción de la genotipificación por NGS en biopsia líquida de una cohorte de pacientes nuestra población.

Los tumores desmoides son infrecuentes, presentan crecimiento localmente agresivo, no suelen dar metástasis pero con frecuencia desarrollan un crecimiento infiltrante que amenaza la vida y puede conducir a una gran morbi-mortalidad. Representan el 0.03% de todos los tumores. En base a la experiencia, los expertos recomiendan la administración de dosis altas de tamoxifeno y sulindac como tratamiento primario para los pacientes con tumores desmoides asociados a poliposis adenomatosa familiar (PAF). Sin embargo, el mejor enfoque después de la intervención quirúrgica para pacientes con tumores desmoides esporádicos, aún no se ha determinado.

Purpose: Inflammation and neutrophils play a central role in both Covid-19 disease and cancer. We aimed to assess the impact of pre-existing tumor-related inflammation on Covid-19 outcomes in patients with cancer and to elucidate the role of circulating neutrophil subpopulations. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of 524 patients with cancer and SARS-CoV-2 infection, assessing the relationship between clinical outcomes and circulating inflammatory biomarkers collected before and during Covid-19 infection. Additionally, a unicenter prospective cohort provided data for an exploratory analysis, assessing the immunophenotype of circulating neutrophils and inflammatory cytokines. The primary endpoints were 30-day mortality and severity of Covid-19 disease. Results: Prior to Covid-19, 25% of patients with cancer exhibited elevated dNLR, which increase to 55% at the time of Covid-19 diagnosis. We developed the FLARE score, incorporating both tumor and infection-induced inflammation, which categorized patients into four prognostic groups. The poor prognostic group had a 30-day mortality rate of 68%, significantly higher than the 23% in the favorable group (p<0.0001). The score proved to be an independent predictor of early mortality. The prospective analysis revealed a shift towards immature forms of neutrophils and higher IL-6 levels in patients with cancer and severe Covid-19 infection. Conclusions: A pre-existing tumor-induced pro-inflammatory state significantly impacts Covid-19 outcomes in patients with cancer. The FLARE score serves as an easy-to-use and worldwide accessible effective tool to predict outcomes in this population, while circulating neutrophil subpopulations might provide additional information and could help refine outcome prediction.

Purpose: Inflammation and neutrophils play a central role in both COVID-19 disease and cancer. We aimed to assess the impact of pre-existing tumor-related inflammation on COVID-19 outcomes in patients with cancer and to elucidate the role of circulating neutrophil subpopulations. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of 524 patients with cancer and SARS-CoV-2 infection, assessing the relationship between clinical outcomes and circulating inflammatory biomarkers collected before and during COVID-19 infection. Additionally, a single-center prospective cohort study provided data for an exploratory analysis, assessing the immunophenotype of circulating neutrophils and inflammatory cytokines. The primary endpoints were 30-day mortality and the severity of COVID-19 disease. Results: Prior to COVID-19, 25% of patients with cancer exhibited elevated dNLR, which increased to 55% at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis. We developed the FLARE score, incorporating both tumor- and infection-induced inflammation, which categorized patients into four prognostic groups. The poor prognostic group had a 30-day mortality rate of 68%, significantly higher than the 23% in the favorable group (p < 0.0001). This score proved to be an independent predictor of early mortality. This prospective analysis revealed a shift towards immature forms of neutrophils and higher IL-6 levels in patients with cancer and severe COVID-19 infection. Conclusions: A pre-existing tumor-induced pro-inflammatory state significantly impacts COVID-19 outcomes in patients with cancer. The FLARE score, derived from circulating inflammatory markers, emerges as an easy-to-use, globally accessible, effective tool for clinicians to identify patients with cancer at heightened risk of severe COVID-19 complications and early mortality who might benefit most from immediate and intensive treatment strategies. Furthermore, our findings underscore the significance of immature neutrophils in the progression of COVID-19 in patients with cancer, advocating for further investigation into how these cells contribute to both cancer and COVID-19 disease.