Dr med Steffen Ruchholtz

Prof. Dr. Dr med Steffen Ruchholtz


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 March 2008 in Deutsches Ärzteblatt international
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DRDr med Steffen Ruchholtz
Dr med Steffen Ruchholtz
RLRolf Lefering
Rolf Lefering
TPThomas Paffrath
Thomas Paffrath
HOHans Jörg Oestern
Hans Jörg Oestern
ENEdmund Neugebauer
Edmund Neugebauer
BBBertil Bouillon
Bertil Bouillon
In Germany, 7 to 8 million accidents occur every year, resulting in 580 000 injured parties (1). In most cases, injuries will be moderate and require only outpatient treatment or brief inpatient treatment. Severe injuries are still a major challenge...

21 August 2012 in European Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DRDr med Steffen Ruchholtz
Dr med Steffen Ruchholtz
JTJordi Tomás
Jordi Tomás
FGFlorian Gebhard
Florian Gebhard
MLMorten Schultz Larsen
Morten Schultz Larsen
Background A variety of methods has been described to stabilise periprosthetic fractures around total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our report offers a review of the actual strategies in the reduction and fixation of these fractures. Surgical treatment should be based on the following four steps: 1. Diagnostics: By taking the patients' history together with an X-ray of the knee and femur, the fracture is analysed. It is crucial to define whether any losening of the prosthesis had occurred. In selected cases, CT-scan may add important information on the stability of the implant. 2. Classification and planning: For most fractures around the distal femur, the Rorabeck classification is used while fractures around the proximal tibia are best classified according to the Felix classification. Additionally the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) may be helpful in the planning process for reduction and fixation. 3. Surgigal technique: In fractures around a stable implant (Rorabeck type I and II; Felix type A and C), it is favourable to use plates and retrograde nails (in Rorabeck I or II with an open box of a TKA). For reduction, three methods are available: (a) the open technique (with direct or indirect reduction); (b) the mini open technique (direct reduction of the fracture by cerclage or lag screw and percutaneous plate fixation in OTA type 32 or 33-A1) and (c) the minimally invasive technique (indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation in all other OTA types). Fractures with a loose prosthesis (Rorabeck III and Felix B) are best stabilised by hinged revision arthroplasty. 4. Rehabilitation: It is of great importance for the aged patient to be mobilised out of bed early. In most of the cases, partial weight bearing has to be performed by the aid of frames during the first 6 weeks after surgery. In a well-fixed revision prosthesis with a cemented stem, early full weight bearing might be allowed. Conclusion Standardised less invasive procedures to treat periprosthetic fractures present a valuable alternative to open techniques. The main advantages are lower rates of oft tissue complications and implant failures following less invasive techniques of long plate application. Polyaxial locking systems allow for stable plate fixation around intramedullary implants.

1 February 2013 in Injury
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DRDr med Steffen Ruchholtz
Dr med Steffen Ruchholtz
BEBilal El-Zayat
Bilal El-Zayat
DKDimitri Kreslo
Dimitri Kreslo
BBBenjamin Bücking
Benjamin Bücking
ULUlrike Lewan
Ulrike Lewan
RZRalph Zettl
Ralph Zettl

29 January 2008 in World Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CKC. A. Kuhne
C. A. Kuhne
RZR. P. Zettl
R. P. Zettl
MFM. Fischbacher
M. Fischbacher
RLRolf Lefering
Rolf Lefering
DRDr med Steffen Ruchholtz
Dr med Steffen Ruchholtz

13 September 2011 in Critical Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BHBjoern Hussmann
Bjoern Hussmann
RLRolf Lefering
Rolf Lefering
CWChristian Waydhas
Christian Waydhas
DRDr med Steffen Ruchholtz
Dr med Steffen Ruchholtz
AWArasch Wafaisade
Arasch Wafaisade
SLSven Lendemans
Sven Lendemans
Introduction: Hypoxia and hypoxemia can lead to an unfavorable outcome after severe trauma, by both direct and delayed mechanisms. Prehospital intubation is meant to ensure pulmonary gas exchange. Limited evidence exists regarding indications for intubation after trauma. The aim of this study was to analyze prehospital intubation as an independent risk factor for the posttraumatic course of moderately injured patients. Therefore, only patients who, in retrospect, would not have required intubation were included in the matched-pairs analysis to evaluate the risks related to intubation. Methods: The data of 42,248 patients taken from the trauma registry of the German Association for Trauma Surgery (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU)) were analyzed. Patients who met the following criteria were included: primary admission to a hospital; Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 13 to 15; age 16 years or older; maximum injury severity per body region (AIS) ≤ 3; no administration of packed red blood cell units in the emergency trauma room; admission between 2005 and 2008; and documented data regarding intubation. The intubated patients were then matched with not-intubated patients. Results: The study population included 600 matched pairs that met the inclusion criteria. The results indicated that prehospital intubation was associated with a prolonged rescue time (not intubated, 64.8 minutes; intubated, 82.3 minutes; P ≤ 0.001) and a higher volume replacement (not intubated, 911.3 ml; intubated, 1,573.8 ml; P ≤ 0.001). In the intubated patients, coagulation parameters, such as the prothrombin time ratio (PT) and platelet count, declined, as did the hemoglobin value (PT not intubated: 92.3%; intubated, 85.7%; P ≤ 0.001; hemoglobin not intubated, 13.4 mg/dl; intubated, 12.2 mg/dl; P ≤ 0.001). Intubation at the scene resulted in an elevated sepsis rate (not intubated, 1.5%; intubated, 3.7%; P ≤ 0.02) and an elevated prevalence of multiorgan failure (MOF) and organ failure (OF) (OF not intubated, 9.1%; intubated, 23.4%; P ≤ 0.001). Conclusions: Prehospital intubation in trauma patients is associated with a number of risks and should be critically weighed, except in cases with clear indicators, such as posttraumatic apnea.

12 April 2016 in European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CSCarsten Schoeneberg
Carsten Schoeneberg
MSM. Schilling
M. Schilling
BHB. Hussmann
B. Hussmann
DSD. Schmitz
D. Schmitz
SLS. Lendemans
S. Lendemans
DRDr med Steffen Ruchholtz
Dr med Steffen Ruchholtz