MERVE GOYMEN

Dr. MERVE GOYMEN

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2020 in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAhmet Fatih Cengiz
Ahmet Fatih Cengiz
MGMERVE GOYMEN
MERVE GOYMEN
CACenk Akcali
Cenk Akcali

22 June 2023 in Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TETuğçe Ergül
Tuğçe Ergül
AGAyşegül Güleç
Ayşegül Güleç
MGMERVE GOYMEN
MERVE GOYMEN
Developments in computer-aided design and three-dimensional (3D) printing have revolutionized the workflow for orthodontic applications. The purpose of this review article is to provide information about 3D printer history and types, appliances manufactured using 3D printers, and new designs that can be used in different cases. Articles published between January 2010 and November 2020 were reviewed on PubMed, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Elsevier, and Google academic resources, and 69 were identified as appropriate for the study. It was seen that bracket and archwires, nasoalveolar molding devices, orthognathic surgical splints, removable appliances, expansion appliances, clear aligner, retainers, auxiliary attachments, and working models can all be made with 3D printers. The 3D printer is now a technology that is easily accessible to orthodontists, increasing the production of different customizable appliances and promising a transition to a digital clinical workflow in the future.

27 November 2019 in Clinical Oral Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMERVE GOYMEN
MERVE GOYMEN
AGAysegul Gulec
Aysegul Gulec

6 May 2025 in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
UMUfuk Metin
Ufuk Metin
MGMERVE GOYMEN
MERVE GOYMEN

1 January 2015 in Photomedicine and Laser Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMERVE GOYMEN
MERVE GOYMEN
EIEren Isman
Eren Isman
LTLale Taner
Lale Taner
MKMehmet Kurkcu
Mehmet Kurkcu
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different laser dose and force levels on the stability of orthodontic mini screws used for anchorage, by histomorphometric analyses. Background data: Low-level laser therapy speeds up blood flow, improves the mechanism of the revitalization processes, reduces the risk of infection, boosts metabolic activities, and accelerates the healing of the damaged tissue. Although there are many research studies about low-level laser therapy applications in a variety of areas, no investigations were found concerning mini screw stability using various laser dose levels with different force level applications. Methods: Seventeen New Zealand white rabbits were used. A total of 68 cylindrical, self-drilling orthodontic mini screws were threaded at the fibula. Experimental subjects were divided into six groups; force application was not performed in the first three groups, whereas 150 g of force was applied via nickel-titanium closed-coil springs placed between two mini screws in the other three groups. Measurements of the initial torque values (10 Ncm) were manipulated by a digital portable torque gauge. Various low-level laser doses were applied to the groups during the postoperative 10 days. After 4 weeks, bone-to-implant contact and cortical bone thickness were histomorphometrically analyzed. Results: In the 150 g force plus 20 J/cm 2 dosage group, the highest bone-to-implant contact values were observed. ( p 0.05). Conclusions: Low-level laser therapy was noticed to induce the mini screw–bone contact area. Low-level laser therapy may be a supplementary treatment method to increase the stability of the orthodontic mini screw.

1 January 2018 in Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MGMERVE GOYMEN
MERVE GOYMEN
AGA Gulec
A Gulec
The experimental sample consisted of the lateral cephalograms of 40 patients who were treated with either TB appliance (n = 15), FRD (n = 15) or the untreated control ones. In treatment groups lateral cephalograms taken before therapy as initial records (T1) and at the completion of functional therapy (T2) were used. The control group comprised 10 children with untreated skeletal Class II malocclusions. The normality of distribution of continuous variables was tested by Shaphiro wilk test. Oneway ANOVA and LSD test in parametric; Kruskall Wallis and all pairwaise multible comparison tests in non-parametric samples were used for comparing differences among 3 groups. Results: Cephalometric analysis revealed that both TB and FRD appliances stimulated mandibular growth (P < 0.05) and no restriction was seen in maxilla in both groups (P > 0.05). The unwanted mandibular proclination was seen more in FRD group (P ≤ 0.001). Soft tissue didn't imitate the hard tissue (P > 0.05). Conclusion: FRD group produced skeletal effects as much as TB group in peak and post peak period of growth with still more mandibular incisor proclination....