Halogen bond has attracted a great deal of attention in the past years for hit-to-lead-to-candidate optimization aiming at improving drug-target binding affinity. In general, heavy organohalogens (i.e., organochlorines, organobromines, and organoiodines) are capable of forming halogen bonds while organofluorines are not. In order to explore the possible roles that halogen bonds could play beyond improving binding affinity, we performed a detailed database survey and quantum chemistry calculation with close attention paid to (1) the change of the ratio of heavy organohalogens to organofluorines along the drug discovery and development process and (2) the halogen bonds between organohalogens and nonbiopolymers or nontarget biopolymers. Our database survey revealed that (1) an obviously increasing trend of the ratio of heavy organohalogens to organofluorines was observed along the drug discovery and development process, illustrating that more organofluorines are worn and eliminated than heavy organohalogens during the process, suggesting that heavy halogens with the capability of forming halogen bonds should have priority for lead optimization; and (2) more than 16% of the halogen bonds in PDB are formed between organohalogens and water, and nearly 20% of the halogen bonds are formed with the proteins that are involved in the ADME/T process. Our QM/MM calculations validated the contribution of the halogen bond to the binding between organohalogens and plasma transport proteins. Thus, halogen bonds could play roles not only in improving drug–target binding affinity but also in tuning ADME/T property. Therefore, we suggest that albeit halogenation is a valuable approach for improving ligand bioactivity, more attention should be paid in the future to the application of the halogen bond for ligand ADME/T property optimization.

Halogenation is an important approach in lead optimization for drug development and about half of the molecules used in high-throughput screening are halogenated. However, there is neither a suitable theoretical algorithm for evaluating the interaction between the halogen atoms of a ligand and its target protein nor a detailed understanding of how a halogen atom interacts with electron-rich atoms or groups of the residues in the binding pocket. In this Perspective, we concentrate on nonbonding interactions of halogens from both crystallographic data and theoretical viewpoints. It is found that organic halogen atoms are favorably involved in a wide variety of noncovalent protein–ligand interactions, such as halogen bonds C–X⋯O and hydrogen bonds C–X⋯H, that show remarkable differences in terms of the geometrical and energetic features. In biological molecules, heavier halogens prefer to form linear interactions with oxygen atoms and aromatic π systems as compared to N or S, while the mean intermolecular distances for these types of halogen bonds increase with the radius or polarizability of halogen atoms, viz., Cl < Br < I. Furthermore, F⋯H interactions in protein–ligand complexes exhibit disparate behavior relative to X⋯H (X = Cl, Br, I) counterparts. These observed tendencies of the interactions involving halogens are subsequently rationalized by means of ab initio calculations using small model systems. The results presented herein should be of great use in the rational design of halogenated ligands as inhibitors and drugs as well as in biological engineering.

Background: Target identification is important for modern drug discovery. With the advances in the development of molecular docking, potential binding proteins may be discovered by docking a small molecule to a repository of proteins with three-dimensional (3D) structures. To complete this task, a reverse docking program and a drug target database with 3D structures are necessary. To this end, we have developed a web server tool, TarFisDock (Tar get Fis hing Dock ing) http://www.dddc.ac.cn/tarfisdock, which has been used widely by others. Recently, we have constructed a protein target database, P otential D rug T arget D atabase (PDTD), and have integrated PDTD with TarFisDock. This combination aims to assist target identification and validation. Description: PDTD is a web-accessible protein database for in silico target identification. It currently contains >1100 protein entries with 3D structures presented in the Protein Data Bank. The data are extracted from the literatures and several online databases such as TTD, DrugBank and Thomson Pharma. The database covers diverse information of >830 known or potential drug targets, including protein and active sites structures in both PDB and mol2 formats, related diseases, biological functions as well as associated regulating (signaling) pathways. Each target is categorized by both nosology and biochemical function. PDTD supports keyword search function, such as PDB ID, target name, and disease name. Data set generated by PDTD can be viewed with the plug-in of molecular visualization tools and also can be downloaded freely. Remarkably, PDTD is specially designed for target identification. In conjunction with TarFisDock, PDTD can be used to identify binding proteins for small molecules. The results can be downloaded in the form of mol2 file with the binding pose of the probe compound and a list of potential binding targets according to their ranking scores. Conclusion: PDTD serves as a comprehensive and unique repository of drug targets. Integrated with TarFisDock, PDTD is a useful resource to identify binding proteins for active compounds or existing drugs. Its potential applications include in silico drug target identification, virtual screening, and the discovery of the secondary effects of an old drug (i.e. new pharmacological usage) or an existing target (i.e. new pharmacological or toxic relevance), thus it may be a valuable platform for the pharmaceutical researchers. PDTD is available online at http://www.dddc.ac.cn/pdtd/.