Jan Peters

Dr. Jan Peters


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 December 2012 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BEBart Elen
Bart Elen
JPJan Peters
Jan Peters
MPMartine Van Poppel
Martine Van Poppel
NBNico Bleux
Nico Bleux
JTJan Theunis
Jan Theunis
ASArnout Standaert
Arnout Standaert
Fixed air quality stations have limitations when used to assess people's real life exposure to air pollutants. Their spatial coverage is too limited to capture the spatial variability in, e.g., an urban or industrial environment. Complementary mobile air quality measurements can be used as an additional tool to fill this void. In this publication we present the Aeroflex, a bicycle for mobile air quality monitoring. The Aeroflex is equipped with compact air quality measurement devices to monitor ultrafine particle number counts, particulate mass and black carbon concentrations at a high resolution (up to 1 second). Each measurement is automatically linked to its geographical location and time of acquisition using GPS and Internet time. Furthermore, the Aeroflex is equipped with automated data transmission, data pre-processing and data visualization. The Aeroflex is designed with adaptability, reliability and user friendliness in mind. Over the past years, the Aeroflex has been successfully used for high resolution air quality mapping, exposure assessment and hot spot identification.

1 January 2013 in Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJan Peters
Jan Peters
JTJan Theunis
Jan Theunis
MPMartine Van Poppel
Martine Van Poppel
PBPatrick Berghmans
Patrick Berghmans
The international journal of Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) covers all aspects of aerosol science and technology, atmospheric science and air quality related issues.

9 June 2022 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jelle HofmanJelle Hofman
Jelle Hofman
JPJan Peters
Jan Peters
CSChristophe Stroobants
Christophe Stroobants
EEEvelyne Elst
Evelyne Elst
BBBart Baeyens
Bart Baeyens
MPMartine Van Poppel
Martine Van Poppel
(1) Background: This work evaluated the usability of commercial “low-cost” air quality sensor systems to substantiate evidence-based policy making. (2) Methods: Two commercially available sensor systems (Airly, Kunak) were benchmarked at a regulatory air quality monitoring station (AQMS) and subsequently deployed in Kampenhout and Sint-Niklaas (Belgium) to address real-world policy concerns: (a) what is the pollution contribution from road traffic near a school and at a central city square and (b) do local traffic interventions result in quantifiable air quality impacts? (3) Results: The considered sensor systems performed well in terms of data capture, correlation and intra-sensor uncertainty. Their accuracy was improved via local re-calibration, up to data quality levels for indicative measurements as set in the Air Quality Directive (Uexp < 50% for PM and <25% for NO2). A methodological setup was proposed using local background and source locations, allowing for quantification of the (3.1) maximum potential impact of local policy interventions and (3.2) air quality impacts from different traffic interventions with local contribution reductions of up to 89% for NO2 and 60% for NO throughout the considered 3 month monitoring period; (4) Conclusions: Our results indicate that commercial air quality sensor systems are able to accurately quantify air quality impacts from (even short-lived) local traffic measures and contribute to evidence-based policy making under the condition of a proper methodological setup (background normalization) and data quality (recurrent calibration) procedure. The applied methodology and learnings were distilled in a blueprint for air quality sensor networks for replication actions in other cities.

18 July 2014 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JDJasper Van doninck
Jasper Van doninck
Bernard De BaetsBernard De Baets
Bernard De Baets
JPJan Peters
Jan Peters
GHGuy Hendrickx
Guy Hendrickx
EDEls Ducheyne
Els Ducheyne
NVNiko Verhoest
Niko Verhoest
Culicoides imicola is the main vector of the bluetongue virus in the Mediterranean Basin. Spatial distribution models for this species traditionally employ either climatic data or remotely sensed data, or a combination of both. Until now, however, no studies compared the accuracies of C. imicola distribution models based on climatic versus remote sensing data, even though remotely sensed datasets may offer advantages over climatic datasets with respect to spatial and temporal resolution. This study performs such an analysis for datasets over the peninsula of Calabria, Italy. Spatial distribution modelling based on climatic data using the random forests machine learning technique resulted in a percentage of correctly classified C. imicola trapping sites of nearly 88%, thereby outperforming the linear discriminant analysis and logistic regression modelling techniques. When replacing climatic data by remote sensing data, random forests modelling accuracies decreased only slightly. Assessment of the different variables’ importance showed that precipitation during late spring was the most important amongst 48 climatic variables. The dominant remotely sensed variables could be linked to climatic variables. Notwithstanding the slight decrease in predictive performance in this study, remotely sensed datasets could be preferred over climatic datasets for the modelling of C. imicola. Unlike climatic observations, remote sensing provides an equally high spatial resolution globally. Additionally, its high temporal resolution allows for investigating changes in species’ presence and changing environment.

25 June 2024 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMartine Van Poppel
Martine Van Poppel
JPJan Peters
Jan Peters
SVStijn Vranckx
Stijn Vranckx
JLJo Van Laer
Jo Van Laer
Jelle HofmanJelle Hofman
Jelle Hofman
WLWouter Lefebvre
Wouter Lefebvre
Mobile monitoring is used as an additional tool to collect air quality data at a high spatial resolution and to complement data from fixed air quality stations. Citizens are interested in contributing to air quality monitoring, and while the availability of low-cost air quality sensors can create opportunities to measure the air quality at a high spatial resolution, the data are often of lower quality, and sensors that measure combustion-related aerosols (like black carbon) are not commonly available. Mobile monitoring using a mid-range instrument can fill this gap. We present the results of a mobile BC (black carbon) monitoring campaign performed by citizens in Mechelen as part of a local citizen observatory (CO), Meet Mee Mechelen, initiated as part of the European H2020 project, Ground Truth 2.0. The goal of the study was two-fold: (1) to propose and evaluate a mobile monitoring method (data collection and data processing) to construct pollution maps of BC concentrations and (2) to demonstrate how to organize community-based air quality monitoring to measure both the spatial and temporal variations in air pollution levels. Measurements were taken during peak hours in four campaigns characterized by different meteorological conditions: October–November 2017, February–March 2018, June–July 2018 and September 2018. The results show large spatial and temporal variabilities. Spatial variability is influenced by traffic volume, stop-and-go traffic and also the building environment and the distance of biking paths from road traffic. The four different campaigns show similar spatial patterns, but due to background and meteorological influences, the absolute concentrations differ between seasons. A rescaling method using data from fixed stations in the air quality monitoring network (AQMN) was presented to construct maps representative of longer periods. This paper shows that mobile measurements can be used by CO to assess the spatial variability of air quality in a city. The data can be used to evaluate mobility plans, carry out hot spot detection, evaluate the exposure of cyclists as a function of cycling infrastructure and perform model validation. However, it is important to use high-quality instruments and apply the correct measurement methodology (number of repetitions, season) to obtain meaningful data.