Aim: We have previously shown that CRP < 2.9 mg/L is a better predictor of endoscopic remission (ER) than CRP < 5 mg/L in ulcerative colitis (UC). Here, we prospectively evaluate CRP and FCP cut-offs and compare them in predicting ER and histological remission (HR) in UC. Method: One hundred thirty-five steroid-free UC patients were evaluated prospectively. ER was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub-score 0–1. In colonoscopy, the colon was evaluated as seven segments: rectum, sigmoid, descending, proximal-transverse, distal-transverse, ascending colon, and cecum. Two biopsies of each segment were evaluated for histological inflammation and graded using the Nancy and Geboes scores. All segment biopsies with Nancy < 1 and Geboes < 2 were defined as HR. Results: The optimum cut-off values for FCP and CRP were 120 μg/g and 2.75 mg/L for ER, respectively. AUC values of FCP and CRP were similar for ER and Mayo-0 disease in ROC analysis. CRP and FCP also had similar performances with these cut-offs regarding ER. While CRP was a predictor to assess the extensiveness of active UC, FCP was not. ROC analysis showed no difference between CRP and FCP regarding HR. Cut-off values for HR were 2.1 mg/L and 55 μg/g for CRP and FCP, respectively. CRP and FCP, in combination with the mentioned cut-off values, detected ER and HR in nearly 2/3 and ½ of the patients, respectively, with high specificity. Conclusions: Reappraised CRP (ER: 2.75 mg/L, HR: 2.1 mg/L) has as much diagnostic contribution as relevant FCP in predicting ER and HR and contributes more to revealing the proximal extension in active colitis compared to FCP. Relevant CRP and FCP combinations may improve the prediction rates.

Behçet’s disease is an autoinflammatory disorder characterized by relapsing and remitting vasculitis that can manifest in various forms, including gastrointestinal Behçet’s disease (GIBD). Its complications (e.g., intestinal perforation) are among the primary causes of morbidity and mortality. GIBD pathogenesis involves the enhanced production of certain cytokines, e.g., tumor necrosis factor α and interleukin-6 (IL-6), which could serve as a target for potential therapies. This review provides an overview of GIBD, including the diagnosis and immunopathogenesis as it is currently understood, and evaluates the emerging role of the inhibition of IL-6 (classic and trans-signaling) as an alternative treatment option for patients with GIBD. Given the current paucity of data, we reflected on the potential of IL-6 inhibitors such as tocilizumab and olamkicept based on immunopathogenic considerations and available clinical data in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), in whom clinical response or remission was induced. The selective inhibition of IL-6 trans-signaling may bring new impetus to the development of this drug class, particularly regarding safety. Still, the benefits of IL-6 inhibitors for patients with GIBD need to be evaluated in appropriate proof-of-concept studies. The clinical outcomes of IL-6 inhibitors in IBD are promising and may suggest their potential relevance in GIBD.

Background: Azathioprine (AZA)-associated acute pancreatitis (AP) and gastrointestinal intolerance (GI-INT) are major causes of drug discontinuation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study compared HLA alleles, demographics, and clinical variables between AZA-AP and AZA-GI-INT. Methods: Data from five IBD centers included control (n = 88), AZA-AP (n = 44), and GI-INT (n = 44) groups. AP was defined by the Atlanta criteria, and GI-INT as acute dyspeptic symptoms related to AZA that resolved after withdrawal. Demographics, disease features, and HLA-DQA1/DRB1 alleles were assessed for associations. Results: Among 176 patients, female sex was more frequent in AZA-AP and GI-INT than controls (p = 0.018, p < 0.001). AZA-AP patients were older at diagnosis vs. controls (p = 0.016) but not vs. GI-INT (p = 0.15). Smoking and alcohol were more common in AZA-AP. The median onset of AP was four weeks, with 91% occurring within three months. GI-INT occurred rapidly, with a median of one day and a maximum of three days after the first dose. HLA-DQA1/DRB1 positivity was comparable in GI-INT and controls (9.2% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.42) but higher in AZA-AP (27.3% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.08). Regression identified female sex, smoking, alcohol, budesonide, and HLA-DQA1/DRB1 positivity (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.004–9.058; p = 0.049) as independent risk factors for AZA-AP. Conclusions: AZA-AP, but not GI-INT, appears genetically influenced, with HLA-DQA1/DRB1 association extending across populations. In IBD, AZA-AP usually emerges within three months and is linked to female sex, smoking, alcohol, and budesonide. GI-INT typically develops within hours to three days of initiation. These findings support AZA-AP and GI-INT as distinct idiosyncratic entities shaped by genetic, metabolic, and sensitivity factors.