We investigated which specific correlation exists between the endothelial cell density (ECD) of corneal endothelial cell (CEC) cultures and the features of the donor corneas from which they originate. CEC cultures were prepared from one donor cornea or by pooling together cells of more corneas from elderly donors with ECDs lower or higher than 2000 cells/mm². The ECDs of such primary cultures were evaluated and showed that that ECDs > 2000 cells/mm² can be obtained only when CECs are isolated from (1) corneas of young donors; (2) at least two elderly donor corneas (if ECD > 2000 cells/mm²), or three elderly donor corneas (if ECD < 2000 cells/mm²). Secondary cultures are all characterized by ECDs < 2000 cells/mm². Our study highlights the difficulties in obtaining cultures with ECDs > 2000 cells/mm². Even if achievable with corneas from young donors, this becomes a challenging task when corneas from elderly donors are used (i.e., the overall majority of those collected by eye banks) and particularly when corneas from elderly donors with ECD < 2000 cells/mm² are used. Pooling more of two corneas to obtain suitable CECs could technically overcome the problem. The above issues should be tackled appropriately before moving into clinical studies.

The aim of the study was to assess different temperature ranges for the preservation of pre-loaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts in the DMEK RAPID Mini device. Methods: Three groups of 15 DMEK grafts (five per group) were pre-loaded in the DMEK RAPID Mini and preserved in Optisol-GS for 72 h at different temperatures: group A at >8 °C, group B between 2–8 °C and group C at 0.05). Endothelial cell density variation was 5.51%, 3.06% and 2.82% in groups A, B and C, respectively (p = 0.19). Total Endothelial Cell Loss (ECL) was 4.37%, 5.32% and 7.84% in groups A, B and C, respectively (p = 0.39). Endothelial cell morphology was comparable in all three groups. Conclusions: In the DMEK RAPID Mini, low temperatures (<2 °C) may affect the quality of pre-loaded grafts, inducing a higher ECL after 72 h of preservation, although no significant differences among groups could be proved. Our data would suggest maintaining grafts loaded in the DMEK RAPID Mini at temperatures between 2–8 °C for appropriate preservation.

Purpose: To report the management of precut Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) lenticules unsuitable for transplantation because of irregular anterior profile after microkeratome cutting. Methods: After preparation for DSAEK, 20 tissues were considered unsuitable for transplantation because of nonhomogeneous posterior stromal thickness. To convert them into suitable tissues for surgery, manual stromal delamination was performed by removing the excess stromal layers after the indications obtained through optical coherence tomography. These tissues were further transplanted as ultrathin DSAEK. Results: Nineteen tissues were delaminated successfully. The average reduction in thickness in the center (63 ± 69 μm; P = 0.0101) and periphery (129 ± 39 μm; P < 0.0001) before and after delamination was significantly different. One tissue showed signs of perforation during manual dissection and therefore considered unsuitable for transplantation. Primary graft failure was reported in one case, but it was not correlated with the tissue preparation. No other clinical complications were observed after surgery. Conclusions: Manual delamination of the stroma because of irregular microkeratome cutting is a viable option to obtain a uniform graft thickness required for DSAEK surgeries. This technique can further reduce tissue wastage that is observed after microkeratome cutting errors.