This study aimed to evaluate the role of the C-reactive protein-to-prealbumin (CP) ratio and the C-reactive protein-to-albumin (CA) ratio as nutritional and prognostic markers. A retrospective study was conducted on hospitalized patients who underwent a nutritional assessment and the measurement of C-reactive protein, prealbumin, and albumin (n = 274). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used. The area under the curve (AUC) of the CP ratio for predicting mortality was 0.644, 95%CI (0.571 to 0.717), and the CA ratio had an AUC of 0.593, 95%CI (0.518 to 0.669). The AUC of the CP ratio for the differential diagnosis between severe and moderate disease-related malnutrition (DRM) was 0.643, 95%CI (0.564 to 0.722), and the CA ratio had an AUC of 0.650, 95%CI (0.572 to 0.728). The CP and CA ratios showed greater accuracy in predicting mortality compared to C-reactive protein as an isolated marker (p = 0.011 and p = 0.006, respectively). Both ratios also improved the ability of prealbumin and albumin to identify severe DRM (p = 0.002 and p = 0.044, respectively). In conclusion, these results suggest that the CP and CA ratios may have a limited role in predicting mortality and identifying severe DRM by outperforming isolated protein markers.
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the prevalence and risk factors associated with disease-related malnutrition (DRM) in hospitalized patients using the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. Additionally, we sought to identify key determinants of moderate and severe malnutrition. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1036 adult patients hospitalized in a tertiary care hospital between August 2019 and November 2020. Nutritional status was evaluated using both the SGA and GLIM criteria. Data on demographic characteristics, comorbidities, dietary intake, and gastrointestinal symptoms were collected. Logistic regression models were employed to identify risk factors for DRM, and multivariate analysis was used to determine independent predictors. Results: The prevalence of DRM was 63.3% according to GLIM and 64.8% according to SGA. Moderate malnutrition was observed in 22.6% of patients, while 40.7% were classified as having severe malnutrition, and severe weight loss was noted in 34.5% of the subjects. The key risk factors for DRM included male sex (OR 1.67, p < 0.0001), non-oncological gastrointestinal conditions (OR 1.48, p = 0.041), infectious diseases (OR 1.66, p = 0.007), inadequate ingestion (OR 5.13, p < 0.0001), and the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms (OR 3.06, p < 0.0001). Individualized diets were found to have a protective effect, while central parenteral nutrition significantly reduced the risk of severe DRM (OR 0.610, p = 0.014). In the final adjusted model, sex (p < 0.0001), ingestion (p < 0.0001), and gastrointestinal symptoms (p < 0.0001) emerged as the most significant independent predictors of DRM. Conclusions: The high prevalence of DRM in hospitalized patients emphasizes the importance of routine nutritional screening and personalized interventions. Proactive management of key risk factors such as inadequate intake and gastrointestinal symptoms is crucial to mitigating malnutrition and improving patient outcomes.
Los nódulos tiroideos representan una causa común de consulta al especialista. El nódulo tiroideo tiene un riesgo de malignidad del 4-15%. El método citopatológico más utilizado para el diagnóstico del cáncer tiroideo es la toma de biopsia por aspiración con aguja fina (BAAF) de los nódulos tiroideos y la utilización del sistema Bethesda (SB) para su informe citopatológico. Realizamos el presente estudio para reportar nuestra experiencia utilizando el SB, y comparar los resultados obtenidos con este sistema con los resultados histopatológicos finales de las tiroidectomías realizadas.