Jiang Zhu

Dr. Jiang Zhu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 September 2020 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GLGuancheng Li
Guancheng Li
LCLijing Cheng
Lijing Cheng
JZJiang Zhu
Jiang Zhu
KTKevin Trenberth
Kevin Trenberth
MMMichael E. Mann
Michael E. Mann
JAJohn P. Abraham
John P. Abraham

18 October 2022 in Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LCLijing Cheng
Lijing Cheng
KSKarina von Schuckmann
Karina von Schuckmann
John AbrahamJohn Abraham
John Abraham
KTKevin Trenberth
Kevin Trenberth
MMMichael E. Mann
Michael E. Mann
XLXiaopei Lin
Xiaopei Lin

23 February 2021 in Earth System Science Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LKLei Kong
Lei Kong
Xiao TangXiao Tang
Xiao Tang
JZJiang Zhu
Jiang Zhu
ZWZifa Wang
Zifa Wang
JLJianjun Li
Jianjun Li
GCGregory R. Carmichael
Gregory R. Carmichael
A 6-year-long high-resolution Chinese air quality reanalysis (CAQRA) dataset is presented in this study obtained from the assimilation of surface observations from the China National Environmental Monitoring Centre (CNEMC) using the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) and Nested Air Quality Prediction Modeling System (NAQPMS).This dataset contains surface fields of six conventional air pollutants in China (i.e. PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, CO, and O3) for the period 2013–2018 at high spatial (15 km×15 km) and temporal (1 h) resolutions. This paper aims to document this dataset by providing detailed descriptions of the assimilation system and the first validation results for the above reanalysis dataset. The 5-fold cross-validation (CV) method is adopted to demonstrate the quality of the reanalysis. The CV results show that the CAQRA yields an excellent performance in reproducing the magnitude and variability of surface air pollutants in China from 2013 to 2018 (CV R2=0.52–0.81, CV root mean square error (RMSE) =0.54 mg/m3 for CO, and CV RMSE =16.4–39.3 µg/m3 for the other pollutants on an hourly scale). Through comparison to the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service reanalysis (CAMSRA) dataset produced by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECWMF), we show that CAQRA attains a high accuracy in representing surface gaseous air pollutants in China due to the assimilation of surface observations. The fine horizontal resolution of CAQRA also makes it more suitable for air quality studies on a regional scale. The PM2.5 reanalysis dataset is further validated against the independent datasets from the US Department of State Air Quality Monitoring Program over China, which exhibits a good agreement with the independent observations (R2=0.74–0.86 and RMSE =16.8–33.6 µg/m3 in different cities). Furthermore, through the comparison to satellite-estimated PM2.5 concentrations, we show that the accuracy of the PM2.5 reanalysis is higher than that of most satellite estimates. The CAQRA is the first high-resolution air quality reanalysis dataset in China that simultaneously provides the surface concentrations of six conventional air pollutants, which is of great value for many studies, such as health impact assessment of air pollution, investigation of air quality changes in China, model evaluation and satellite calibration, optimization of monitoring sites, and provision of training data for statistical or artificial intelligence (AI)-based forecasting. All datasets are freely available at https://doi.org/10.11922/sciencedb.00053 (Tang et al., 2020a), and a prototype product containing the monthly and annual means of the CAQRA dataset has also been released at https://doi.org/10.11922/sciencedb.00092 (Tang et al., 2020b) to facilitate the evaluation of the CAQRA dataset by potential users.

1 October 2016 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJun Liu
Jun Liu
YHYiqun Han
Yiqun Han
XTXiao Tang
Xiao Tang
JZJiang Zhu
Jiang Zhu
TZTong Zhu
Tong Zhu

10 October 2006 in International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YCYanhua Cao
Yanhua Cao
JZJiang Zhu
Jiang Zhu
INIonel Michael Navon
Ionel Michael Navon
ZLZhendong Luo
Zhendong Luo

22 December 2020 in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HZHe Zhang
He Zhang
MZMinghua Zhang
Minghua Zhang
JJJiangbo Jin
Jiangbo Jin
KFKece Fei
Kece Fei
DJDuoying Ji
Duoying Ji
JZJiang Zhu
Jiang Zhu
The second version of Chinese Academy of Sciences Earth System Model (CAS‐ESM 2) is described with emphasis on the development process, strength and weakness, and climate sensitivities in simulations of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) DECK experiments. CAS‐ESM 2 was built as a numerical model to simulate both the physical climate system as well as atmospheric chemistry and carbon cycle. It is a newcomer in the international modeling community to provide sufficiently independent solutions of climate simulations from those of other models. Performances of the model in simulating the basic states of the radiation budget of the atmosphere and ocean, precipitation, circulations, variabilities, and the 20th Century warming are presented. Model biases and their possible causes are discussed. Strength includes horizontal heat transport in the atmosphere and oceans, vertical profile of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation; weakness includes the double Inter‐Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) and stronger amplitude of the El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO) that are also common in many other models. The simulated the 20th Century warming shares a similar discrepancy with observations as in several other models—less warming in the 1920s and stronger cooling in the 1960s than in observation—at the time when there was a steep increase of anthropogenic aerosols. As a result, the 20th Century warming is about 60% of the observed warming despite that the model simulated a similar slope of warming trend after 1980 to observation. The model has an equilibrium climate sensitivity of 3.4 K with a positive cloud feedback from the shortwave radiation.