Background: Undoubtedly, overlooking a stroke can result in severe disability or even death. However, identifying stroke patients in the prehospital setting poses a significant challenge. While the Face–Arm–Speech–Time (FAST) score is widely used, its effectiveness has been questioned because of its focus on symptoms primarily associated with anterior circulation strokes. In response to this limitation, we developed the innovative FAST4D score and conducted a comparative analysis of stroke detection rates between the novel FAST4D score and the FAST score. Methods: This prospective, multicenter proof-of-concept study aimed to assess stroke detection rates using both the FAST score and the new FAST4D score, which incorporates additional items such as the acute onset of diplopic images, deficit in the field of vision, dizziness/vertigo, and dysmetria/ataxia. Following their presentation to emergency medical services, all patients suspected of having a stroke and those diagnosed with a stroke upon discharge were included in this study. The diagnostic performance of the novel FAST4D score was evaluated and compared with that of the FAST score. Results: Between May 2019 and June 2021, a total of 1469 patients (749 female) were enrolled, with 1035 patients discharged with the diagnosis of stroke. Notably, 259 patients were identified solely through the FAST4D score. This resulted in a significantly higher rate of correctly identified as having had a stroke (stroke detection rate, sensitivity) with the new FAST4D score (93%) compared with the established FAST score (78%) (p < 0.001). This resulted in a reduction in false negative diagnoses by 65%. Conclusions: The novel FAST4D score demonstrated a 15-percentage increase in the stroke detection rate. This heightened detection rate holds the potential for more accurate patient allocation to stroke units, consequently reducing the time to revascularization.

Objectives: Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide, requiring timely intervention with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). This study evaluates real-world stroke management in a regional stroke unit, focusing on IVT administration and EVT transfer logistics. Design: A sub-analysis was performed using prospectively collected data from an observational study. Setting: This study took place at a regional, non-university stroke unit in Germany, serving approximately 253,000 inhabitants. Participants: A total of 2436 patients were admitted for suspected stroke between May 2019 and June 2021. Outcome Measures: Outcome measures included IVT administration rates, reasons for IVT non-administration, and EVT transfer logistics for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. Results: Of 952 stroke cases, 14.8% received IVT, with a mean door-to-needle time (DNT) of 41 ± 36 min. The most common reasons for IVT non-administration were unclear or elapsed symptom onset (51.8%), anticoagulation (7.9%), resolving symptoms (18.4%), and intracranial hemorrhage (7.1%). EVT transfers occurred in 6.7% of AIS patients, with a mean door-in-door-out (DIDO) time of 81 ± 36 min. Conclusions: This study highlights the low IVT rate, primarily due to delayed hospital presentation, and the limited number of EVT transfers. The prolonged DIDO times emphasize the urgent need for streamlined transfer protocols to optimize stroke care delivery.