Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) accounts for about 75% of new bladder cancer diagnoses. Early detection improves survival, yet routine white-light cystoscopy is invasive, costly, and can miss up to 45% of flat or small lesions. These shortcomings have prompted development of label-free diagnostic tools that read the intrinsic optical, electrical, or mechanical signatures of urinary biomarkers without added labels. This review examines recent engineering advances in such platforms for NMIBC detection, focusing on analytical performance, readiness for clinical translation, and remaining barriers to adoption. We compare each technology with conventional cytology using key metrics such as limit of detection, diagnostic accuracy, analysis time, cohort size, and stage of clinical development. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and interferometric flow cytometry offer femtomolar sensitivity and more than 98% accuracy within minutes, while compact electrochemical sensors targeting NMP22, Galectin-1, and microRNAs reach sub-picogram levels on disposable chips. Standardized sample handling, multicenter validation, and robust cost-effectiveness data are now essential for these tools to advance point-of-care NMIBC surveillance.

Despite curative-intent local therapy, approximately 27% to 53% of prostate cancer (PCa) patients experience prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence, known as biochemical recurrence (BCR). BCR significantly raises the risk of PCa-related morbidity and mortality, yet there is not consensus on optimal management. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) has emerged as highly sensitive imaging, distinguishing local recurrences from distant metastases, crucially influencing treatment decisions. Genomic biomarkers such as Decipher, Prolaris, and Oncotype DX contribute to refining recurrence risk profiles, guiding decisions on intensifying adjuvant therapies like radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). This review assesses PSMA PET and biomarkers utility in post-radical prostatectomy BCR scenarios, highlighting their impact on clinical decision-making. Despite their promising roles, routine integration of biomarkers is limited by availability and cost, requiring further evidence. PSMA PET remains indispensable for restaging and treatment evaluation in these patients. Integrating biomarkers and PSMA PET promises to optimize personalized management strategies for BCR, though more comprehensive consensus-building studies are needed to define their standardized utility in clinical practice.

Despite curative-intent local therapy, approximately 27% to 53% of prostate cancer (PCa) patients experience prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence, known as biochemical recurrence (BCR). BCR significantly raises the risk of PCa-related morbidity and mortality, yet there is no consensus on optimal management. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) has emerged as highly sensitive imaging, distinguishing local recurrences from distant metastases, crucially influencing treatment decisions. Genomic biomarkers such as Decipher, Prolaris, and Oncotype DX contribute to refining recurrence risk profiles, guiding decisions on intensifying adjuvant therapies, like radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). This review assesses PSMA PET and biomarker utility in post-radical prostatectomy BCR scenarios, highlighting their impact on clinical decision-making. Despite their promising roles, the routine integration of biomarkers is limited by availability and cost, requiring further evidence. PSMA PET remains indispensable for restaging and treatment evaluation in these patients. Integrating biomarkers and PSMA PET promises to optimize personalized management strategies for BCR, though more comprehensive consensus-building studies are needed to define their standardized utility in clinical practice.