Cheng Liu

Dr. Cheng Liu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 July 2022 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DGDengzhou Gao
Dengzhou Gao
CLCheng Liu
Cheng Liu
XLXiaofei Li
Xiaofei Li
YZYanling Zheng
Yanling Zheng
HDHongpo Dong
Hongpo Dong
LHLijun Hou
Lijun Hou

19 November 2024 in Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYuan Liu
Yuan Liu
WLWeijie Li
Weijie Li
HMHongfan Meng
Hongfan Meng
QXQinyu Xu
Qinyu Xu
LSLiqiang Sun
Liqiang Sun
LJLi Jiang
Li Jiang

1 March 2016 in Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CLCheng Liu
Cheng Liu
JWJie Wang
Jie Wang
ZCZhen Cao
Zhen Cao
Wei ChenWei Chen
Wei Chen
HBHongkai Bi
Hongkai Bi
Algae cells were the main sources of dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) in raw water with plenty of algae, and ultrasonic pretreatment was one of the algae-controlling methods through the damage of algae cells. However, the variation of DON concentration during the ultrasonic treatment process was not confirmed. Variation of DON concentration during the processes of low frequency ultrasound treatment of Microcystis aeruginosa was investigated. In addition, the effect of sonication on the metabolite concentration, algae cellar activity and the subsequent coagulation performance were discussed. The results showed that after a long duration of ultrasonic (60 s), nearly 90% of the algal cells were damaged and the maximum concentration of DON attained more than 3 mg/L. In order to control the leakage extent of DON, the sonication time should be less than 30 s with power intensity of more than 1.0 W/cm(3). In the mean time, ultrasonic treatment could inhibit the reactivation and the proliferation of algal, keep the algae cell wall integrity and enhance coagulation effectively under the same condition. However, ultrasound frequency had little effect on DON at the frequency range used in this study (20-150 kHz).

15 March 2025 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLCheng Liu
Cheng Liu
SSShijie Shang
Shijie Shang
CWChao Wang
Chao Wang
JTJing Tian
Jing Tian
LZLiting Zhang
Liting Zhang
Genxing PanGenxing Pan
Genxing Pan
Peanut yield and quality are often threatened by soil degradation under continuous cropping. Biochar has been known to improve the soil microbial community and plant resistance. However, studies on its functions to reduce soil degradation losses and improve the peanut yield are limited. A field peanut experiment was conducted in an Alfisol soil and biochar was applied at a rate of 20 t ha−1 in 2022. The biochar was prepared from woodchip (WB) and maize straw (MB) feedstocks alone, as well as with co-composted biochar of the same feedstocks with pig manure labeled as WBSC and MBSC amendment, respectively. The conventional organic manure was applied as a control treatment (OM). All plots were base-fertilized with a mineral compound fertilizer of N-P2O5-K2O (16-16-16, %) at 600 kg ha−1. Topsoil (20 cm) and plant samples were collected at the time of peanut harvest. Soil quality, enzyme function, peanut growth traits, microbial abundance, and community composition were analyzed. Compared to OM, peanut yields increased by 22%, 23%, and 18% under WB, WBSC, and MBSC, respectively. The content of oleic acid increased by 4–5%, while the content of linoleic acid decreased by 7–9%, respectively, under biochar–compost treatments. However, biochar amendment alone showed non-significant changes in these fatty acids. The soil extracellular enzyme activity increased by 3.7–5.5% with biochar amendments and 6.4–10.1% with biochar–compost application. The enzyme activity ratio of hydrolase to non-hydrolase, of C cycling to N cycling, and of P cycling increased by 11.4–15.9%, 20.9–33.8%, and 14.7–23.5% under biochar amendments and by 20.5–25.0%, 17.4–39.0%, and 23.5–32.3% under biochar–compost, respectively. Overall, crop residue biochar enhanced peanut yield and quality by improving soil aggregation, enzyme functionality, and fungal community in line with the soil nutrient supply.

27 October 2025 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLCheng Liu
Cheng Liu
CWChao Wang
Chao Wang
SSShijie Shang
Shijie Shang
JMJingyu Ma
Jingyu Ma
SSShengdao Shan
Shengdao Shan
Genxing PanGenxing Pan
Genxing Pan
Land application of biochar appears to be the most promising tool for managing soil and plant health in agriculture for food production. Biochar induces plant resistance and root growth, deactivates fungitoxic compounds, supports better habituation of beneficial microorganisms, and alters soil properties to facilitate moisture and nutrient availability. This review assimilates lessons from the authors’ experience with biochar application in agriculture, in addition to the previous literature, to elucidate the role of biochar in crop production, from soil health to plant health (root growth, disease control, yield, and quality), and its link to food health. This review provides bottom–up evidence for developing biochar-assisted agriculture in the context of ONE Health applied to soil–plant–food, contributing to achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs).

19 May 2025 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YZYuan Zeng
Yuan Zeng
SCSujuan Chen
Sujuan Chen
YLYunpeng Li
Yunpeng Li
LXLi Xiong
Li Xiong
CLCheng Liu
Cheng Liu
JSJianfei Sun
Jianfei Sun
The growing global population and increasing agricultural demands have made nitrogen fertilizers essential for modern agriculture. However, nearly 50% of applied nitrogen fertilizers are lost to the environment, causing pollution and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Biochar-based fertilizers (BBFs), combining biochar with chemical fertilizers, enhance nutrient efficiency, boost crop yields, and reduce N2O emissions. However, comprehensive field studies on BBF impacts remain limited. This study uses a global dataset of BBF field experiments to build predictive models with three machine learning algorithms for crop yields and N2O emissions, and to assess BBFs’ potential to increase yields and mitigate emissions in China’s major crops. The artificial neural network (ANN) model outperformed random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) in predicting N2O emissions (R2: 0.99; EF: 0.99), while all models showed high accuracy for crop yields (R2, EF: 0.98–0.99). Variable importance analysis revealed that BBF C/N and BBF N/Mineral N explained 4.25% and 3.95% of yield variation, and 3.19% and 0.55% of N2O emission variation, respectively. BBFs could increase China’s major crop yields by 4.3–5.0% and reduce N2O emissions by 3.7–6.3%, based on simulations. Challenges like high costs and limited adaptability persist, necessitating optimized production, standardized protocols, and expanded trials.