Cardiovascular–kidney–metabolic (CKM) syndrome represents a complex interplay between cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and metabolic disorders, significantly impacting cancer patients. The presence of CKM syndrome in cancer patients not only worsens their prognosis but also increases the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), reduces quality of life (QoL), and affects overall survival (OS). Furthermore, several anticancer therapies, including anthracyclines, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and hormonal treatments, can exacerbate CKM syndrome by inducing cardiotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and metabolic dysregulation. This review explores the pathophysiology of CKM syndrome in cancer patients and highlights emerging therapeutic strategies to mitigate its impact. We discuss the role of novel pharmacological interventions, including sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i), and soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) activators, as well as dietary and lifestyle interventions. Optimizing the management of CKM syndrome in cancer patients is crucial to improving OS, enhancing QoL, and reducing MACE. By integrating cardiometabolic therapies into oncologic care, we can create a more comprehensive treatment approach that reduces the burden of cardiovascular and renal complications in this vulnerable population. Further research is needed to establish personalized strategies for CKM syndrome prevention and treatment in cancer patients.

Patients with active cancer and cancer survivors are at a markedly increased risk for developing cardiovascular comorbidities, including heart failure, coronary artery disease, and renal dysfunction, which are often compounded by the cardiotoxic effects of cancer therapies. This heightened cardiovascular vulnerability underscores the urgent need for effective, safe, and evidence-based cardioprotective strategies to reduce both cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), a class of drugs originally developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, have demonstrated significant cardiovascular and renal benefits in high-risk populations, independent of glycemic control. Among the currently available SGLT2i, such as empagliflozin, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and sotagliflozin, there is growing evidence supporting their role in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), hospitalization for heart failure, and the progression of chronic kidney disease. Recent preclinical and clinical data suggest that SGLT2is exert cardioprotective effects through multiple mechanisms, including the modulation of inflammasome activity, specifically by reducing NLRP3 inflammasome activation and MyD88-dependent signaling, which are critical drivers of cardiac inflammation and fibrosis. Moreover, SGLT2is have been shown to enhance mitochondrial viability in cardiac cells, promoting improved cellular energy metabolism and function, thus mitigating cardiotoxicity. This narrative review critically evaluates the emerging evidence on the cardiorenal protective mechanisms of SGLT2is, with a particular focus on their potential role in cardio-oncology. We explore the common pathophysiological pathways between cardiovascular dysfunction and cancer, the molecular rationale for the use of SGLT2is in cancer patients, and the potential benefits in both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular toxicity related to oncological treatments. The aim is to propose a therapeutic paradigm utilizing SGLT2is to reduce cardiovascular mortality, MACE, and the burden of cardiotoxicity in high-risk oncology patients, fostering an integrated approach to cardio-oncology care.

Cardiac metastases (CMs) are more common than primary cardiac tumors, with autopsy studies reporting incidence rates between 2.3% and 18.3%. Their increasing detection is largely attributed to advances in cancer treatments, which have extended patient survival. CMs may present with diverse clinical manifestations depending on their size, location, and extent of infiltration, although they often remain asymptomatic and are identified only postmortem. Sometimes, they are incidentally discovered during tumor staging or follow-up evaluations. This review explores the incidence, pathophysiology, clinical features, and potential complications of CMs, focusing on their prevalence and characteristics. It highlights the importance of early detection and optimized management strategies to address this growing clinical concern. Further research is essential to elucidate the mechanisms driving CMs and develop effective therapeutic interventions.

Cancer patients, especially long cancer survivors, are exposed to several cardio-metabolic diseases, including diabetes, heart failure, and atherosclerosis, which increase their risk of cardiovascular mortality. Therapy with glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) receptor agonists demonstrated several beneficial cardiovascular effects, including atherosclerosis and heart failure prevention. Cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) suggest that GLP-1 RA could exert cardiorenal benefits and systemic anti-inflammatory effects in patients with type-2 diabetes through the activation of cAMP and PI3K/AkT pathways and the inhibition of NLRP-3 and MyD88. In this narrative review, we highlight the biochemical properties of GLP-1 RA through a deep analysis of the clinical and preclinical evidence of the primary prevention of cardiomyopathies. The overall picture of this review encourages the study of GLP-1 RA in cancer patients with type-2 diabetes, as a potential primary prevention strategy against heart failure and atherosclerosis.

Cardiotoxicity represents the most frequent cause with higher morbidity and mortality among long-term sequelae affecting classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. The multidisciplinary team of Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) researchers, with the methodological guide of Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri”, conducted a systematic review of the literature (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane database) according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, in order to analyze the following aspects of cHL and DLBCL survivorship: (i) incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD); (ii) risk of long-term CVD with the use of less cardiotoxic therapies (reduced-field radiotherapy and liposomal doxorubicin); and (iii) preferable cardiovascular monitoring for left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, coronary heart disease (CHD) and valvular disease (VHD). After the screening of 659 abstracts and related 113 full-text papers, 23 publications were eligible for data extraction and included in the final sample. There was an increased risk for CVD in cHL survivors of 3.6 for myocardial infarction and 4.9 for congestive heart failure (CHF) in comparison to the general population; the risk increased over the years of follow-up. In addition, DLBCL patients presented a 29% increased risk for CHF. New radiotherapy techniques suggested reduced risk of late CVD, but only dosimetric studies were available. The optimal monitoring of LV function by 2D-STE echocardiography should be structured according to individual CV risk, mainly considering as risk factors a cumulative doxorubicine dose >250 mg per square meter (m²) and mediastinal radiotherapy >30 Gy, age at treatment 60 years, evaluating LV ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain, and global circumferential strain. The evaluation for asymptomatic CHD should be offered starting from the 10th year after mediastinal RT, considering ECG, stress echo, or coronary artery calcium (CAC) score. Given the suggested increased risks of cardiovascular outcomes in lymphoma survivors compared to the general population, tailored screening and prevention programs may be warranted to offset the future burden of disease.

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a devastating complication of cancer that can significantly impact a patient’s health and life. The incidence of CAT is approximately 20%, and 1 in 5 cancer patients will develop CAT annually. Indeed, CAT can promote pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, leading to increased morbidity and mortality that dramatically impact survival. CAT can also provoke delay or discontinuation of anticancer treatment, which may result in a lack of treatment efficacy and high costs for patients, institutions, and society. Current guidelines advocate direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as the first-line anticoagulant option in CAT. Compared to low-molecular-weight-heparins (LMWHs), DOACs are advantageous in that they typically have an oral route of administration, do not require laboratory monitoring, and have a more predictable anticoagulant effect. However, in patients with thrombocytopenia, renal failure, or those receiving anticancer regimens with potential for drug-drug interactions, LMWH is still the mainstay of care. The main limitation of current anticoagulant agents is related to bleeding risk (BR), both for DOACs and LMWHs. Specifically, DOACs have been associated with high BR in gastrointestinal and genitourinary cancers. In this challenging scenario, abelacimab, an anti-factor XI agent, could represent a viable option in the management of CAT due to its “hemostasis sparing” effect. The safe profile of abelacimab could be useful in patients with active malignancy and CAT, as long-term anticoagulant therapy is often required. Two ongoing international phase III trials (Aster and Magnolia) compare abelacimab with the standard of care (i.e., apixaban in patients with CAT and dalteparin in those with CAT and high BR, respectively). Abelacimab is a new and attractive anticoagulant for the management of CAT, especially in the insidious and critical scenario of active cancer patients with venous thromboembolism and high BR. The aim of this narrative review is to discuss the updated evidence on the performance of DOACs and LMWHs in the treatment of CAT and to focus on the potential role of abelacimab in CAT and its promising associated clinical trials.