Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in men and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Growing evidence indicates that metabolic syndrome components, including obesity, insulin resistance, and hyperglycemia, contribute to PCa development, and progression to more aggressive form. At the same time, standard treatments such as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) significantly improve oncologic outcomes but are associated with adverse metabolic effects, including increased fat mass, insulin resistance, and sarcopenia, potentially worsening patients’ overall metabolic profile and quality of life. Tumor progression in PCa is strongly driven by androgen receptor (AR) signaling, which is closely linked to cellular metabolic reprogramming, highlighting metabolism as a potential therapeutic target. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and synthesize current evidence on the role of the ketogenic diet (KD) in PCa, with particular emphasis on its interaction with hormonal therapies, underlying metabolic and endocrine mechanisms, and its potential application as an adjunctive strategy in integrated oncologic care. Results: The KD, characterized by high fat and very low carbohydrate intake, induces a metabolic state of ketosis that reduces circulating glucose, insulin, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), potentially counteracting metabolic alterations associated with PCa and its treatments. Preclinical studies consistently demonstrate that carbohydrate restriction and KD can slow tumor growth, modulate key oncogenic pathways such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR, reduce systemic insulin signaling, and enhance survival in prostate cancer models. Additionally, emerging evidence suggests possible synergistic effects when KD is combined with standard therapies, including ADT and immunotherapy. Clinical data, although limited, indicate that low-carbohydrate dietary interventions may improve metabolic parameters and could delay biochemical progression, as suggested by increased prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time. However, results across studies remain heterogeneous, and robust evidence on long-term oncologic outcomes is lacking. Conclusions: Overall, the KD represents a promising but still experimental strategy in PCa management, requiring careful nutritional supervision to avoid adverse effects such as unintended weight loss or sarcopenia. Further well-designed randomized clinical trials are needed to clarify its safety, efficacy, and role in routine clinical practice.

Objectives: Evaluate the prevalence of genetic factors in a large population of infertile subjects and define the seminological, hormonal, and ultrasonographic features for each alteration. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included male partners of infertile couples undergoing genetic investigations due to oligozoospermia or azoospermia evaluated from January 2012 to January 2022. The genetic investigations consist of karyotype, CFTR gene mutations plus variant of the IVS8-5T polymorphic trait, Y chromosome microdeletion, and Next Generation Sequencing panel to analyze genes implicated in congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH). Results: Overall, 15.4% (72/466) of patients received a diagnosis of genetic cause of infertility. Specifically, 23 patients (31.9%) harbor mutations in the CFTR gene, 22 (30.6%) have a 47, XXY karyotype, 14 (19.4%) patients show a Y chromosome microdeletion, 7 (9.7%) have structural chromosomal anomalies, and 6 (8.3%) have CHH. Overall, 80.6% of patients were azoospermic and 19.4% oligozoospermic (sperm concentration 3.5 ± 3.8 million/mL). Almost all patients presented hormonal alterations related to the specific genotype, while the main ultrasound alterations were testicular hypoplasia, calcifications/microcalcifications, and enlarged/hyperechoic epididymis. Conclusions: The prevalence of genetic abnormalities in males of infertile couples was 15.4% in our Center. CFTR gene disease-causing variants resulted in more frequent, with various clinical features, highlighting the complexity and heterogeneity of the presentation. Other investigations are needed to understand if conditions like ring chromosomes and other translocations are related to infertility or are incidental factors.

Background/Objectives: Metabolic alterations, including dyslipidemia, may influence tumor biology and treatment outcomes in neuroendocrine tumors. However, the clinical relevance of dyslipidemia and lipid-lowering therapy in bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (BP-NETs) treated with somatostatin analogues (SSAs) remains poorly defined. This translational proof-of-concept study evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced BP-NETs receiving SSAs according to dyslipidemia and statin therapy and explored the effects of statin-SSA combination treatment in vitro. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 24 patients with advanced well-differentiated BP-NETs treated with SSAs as first-line therapy. Fourteen patients (58.3%) had dyslipidemia, and 11 of them were receiving statins. In parallel, NCI-H727 cells were treated with atorvastatin (10 µM), lanreotide (5 or 10 µM), or their combination for 48–72 h. Cell viability, proliferation, cell death, apoptosis, DNA damage, and ATP production were assessed. Results: Median PFS was 22.5 months overall. A trend toward longer PFS was observed in non-dyslipidemic vs. dyslipidemic patients (70 vs. 36 months, p = 0.08). Among dyslipidemic patients, statin therapy was associated with a non-significant trend toward longer PFS compared with no statin therapy (36 vs. 18 months, p = 0.30). In vitro, combined atorvastatin–lanreotide treatment reduced cell viability and proliferation, increased cell death, enhanced cleaved caspase-3 and p-γH2AX expression, and reduced ATP production. Conclusions: These findings support the potential relevance of lipid metabolism modulation as an adjunct strategy in advanced BP-NETs while highlighting the need for larger prospective studies and dedicated biochemical investigation of the underlying lipid-related pathways.

Background/Objectives: Metabolic alterations, including dyslipidemia, are increasingly recognized in patients with neuroendocrine tumors and may influence tumor biology and treatment outcomes. However, the clinical relevance of dyslipidemia and the potential impact of lipid-lowering therapies in bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (BP-NETs) treated with somatostatin analogues (SSAs) remain poorly defined. This study aimed to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced BP-NETs receiving SSAs according to dyslipidemia as well as statin therapy. In addition, an exploratory in vitro analysis was performed to assess the combined biological effect of statins and SSAs. Methods: This study investigated the combined effects of atorvastatin and lanreotide therapy both in vitro and in a clinical setting. In NCI-H727 cells, we assessed cell viability, proliferation, apoptosis, DNA damage, and metabolic activity following single and combined treatments. Concurrently, we retrospectively evaluated the impact of dyslipidemia and statin therapy on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced BP-NETs receiving SSAs. Results: Combined treatment resulted in reduced cell viability, proliferation, and ATP production, alongside increased apoptosis and DNA damage, and was associated with impaired cellular energy metabolism compared with lanreotide alone and control conditions. In the clinical analysis, dyslipidemia was associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS), whereas atorvastatin therapy in dyslipidemic patients showed a positive trend toward improved PFS. Conclusions: These findings support the potential relevance of lipid metabolism modulation as an adjunct strategy in advanced BP-NETs, warranting further validation in larger prospective studies and encouraging additional biochemical investigation of the underlying pathways.