Cardiovascular disease is a common problem in cancer patients that is becoming more widely recognized. This may be a consequence of prior cardiovascular risk factors but could also be secondary to the anticancer treatments. With the goal of offering a multidisciplinary approach to guaranteeing optimal cancer therapy and the early detection of related cardiac diseases, and in light of the recent ESC Cardio-Oncology Guideline recommendations, we developed a Cardio-Oncology unit devoted to the prevention and management of these specific complications. This document brings together important aspects to consider for the development and organization of a Cardio-Oncology program through our own experience and the current evidence.

Background/Objectives: Fluoropyrimidines are widely used chemotherapeutic agents in various solid tumors. Germline variants in the DPYD gene, which encodes the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), are known to impair drug metabolism and increase the risk of severe toxicity. This umbrella review aims to synthesize the current evidence from systematic reviews on the association between DPYD variants and fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 2023, including gray literature. Systematic reviews assessing fluoropyrimidine toxicity in oncologic patients with DPYD variants were included. Study quality was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Registration number in PROSPERO: CRD42023401226. Results: Two independent investigators performed the study selection, quality assessment, and data collection. Eight systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. Methodological confidence was rated as critically low in six, low in one, and medium in another one. The reviews included 125 primary studies, most of them focused on four key DPYD variants (DPYD2*A, DPYD*13, c.2846A>T, and HapB3), all of which showed consistent associations with an increased risk of severe toxicity. Rare variants such as DPYD*4, *5, and *6 were also examined, though evidence remains limited. Pharmacogenetics-guided dosing of fluoropyrimidines significantly reduced toxicity rates in several studies. The integration of DPYD genotyping with phenotyping approaches faces limitations; these tests should complement rather than replace genotyping information. Conclusions: This umbrella review confirms the clinical relevance of DPYD genotyping to predict and mitigate fluoropyrimidine toxicity. Incorporating genotyping into clinical practice, potentially alongside phenotyping and therapeutic drug monitoring, may enhance patient safety and treatment efficacy.

Everolimus is an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) used in both transplantation and cancer treatment (breast, renal and neuroendocrine). In transplantation, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended due to the potential drug–drug interactions with chronic medications, which can affect everolimus pharmacokinetics. In cancer treatment, everolimus is used at higher doses than in transplantation and without a systematic drug monitoring.We present a case report of a 72-year-old woman with epilepsy history to whom everolimus 10 mg QD was prescribed as third line of treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The potential drug interactions between everolimus and the patient's chronic medications, carbamazepine and phenytoin, are significant as both are known as strong inducers CYP3A4 metabolism, potentially leading to underexposure to everolimus.TDM of everolimus was recommended by the pharmacist. The literature suggests that a minimum plasma concentration (Cminss) of everolimus over 10 ng/ml is associated with better response to treatment and progression-free survival (PFS). The patient’s everolimus dose had to be increased until 10 mg BID, and regular monitoring of everolimus levels showed an increase in Cminss from 3.7 ng/ml to 10.8 ng/ml.This case highlights the importance of checking for potential drug interactions and monitoring everolimus levels in patients on chronic medication, especially those with several inducers or inhibitors of CYP3A4 metabolism. TDM can help to ensure that patients are treated with their optimal dose, which can improve the effectiveness of the treatment or minimize the risk of toxicities.

Background: Everolimus, an oral inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), is actually used to prevent organ transplant rejection and treat metastatic breast, renal, and neuroendocrine cancers. Despite significant pharmacokinetic variability among patients, routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is not commonly used in oncology. Methods: The aim of this multicenter, prospective observational cohort study is to assess the prevalence of everolimus minimum concentration at a steady state (Cminss) falling outside the therapeutic range (10–26.3 ng/mL) during a routine TDM programme. Sixty patients with metastatic breast, neuroendocrine, or renal cancers, either starting or continuing everolimus treatment according to hospital protocols, are to be included between 1st of January 2024 and 31st of December 2025 (patients undergoing clinical trials are excluded). We hypothesize that 30–50% of our patients and their blood samples will not achieve the target optimal plasma concentrations. Blood samples are collected every 4–6 weeks to monitor drug levels. The secondary goal is to explore correlation between out-of-range everolimus levels and factors such as demographic and anthropometric data, treatment specifics, lab results, genetic polymorphisms, and the presence of toxicity. Conclusions: This study could offer valuable insights into optimizing dosing strategies and may contribute to future research on personalizing everolimus and other anticancer treatments. This personalized approach seeks to tailor therapy not only to the tumour’s molecular profile but also to the individual characteristics of each patient, improving both drug selection and dosing precision.

Durante la última década, el conocimiento de nuevos mecanismos implicados en el desarrollo del cáncer ha permitido el diseño de nuevos fármacos para su tratamiento y la mayor parte de ellos son fármacos que se administran por vía oral. Uno de los principales problemas de los pacientes oncohematológicos es la desnutrición, que suele tener causas multifactoriales (de la propia enfermedad, de los pacientes y de los diferentes tratamientos administrados). Para minimizar el impacto de la desnutrición es necesaria una intervención nutricional, ya sea adaptando la dieta o mediante la instauración de soporte nutricional artificial, en función de la gravedad de cada caso. En cualquier paciente que esté recibiendo un tratamiento oncológico hay que evaluar las posibles interacciones que pueden existir con el soporte nutricional instaurado, ya sea dieta oral, suplementación oral o nutrición enteral. Estas interacciones pueden disminuir la eficacia, aumentar la toxicidad de los tratamientos o producir déficits nutricionales. Se detallan las principales interacciones que se pueden producir, las interacciones entre los tratamientos oncológicos y el soporte nutricional.

Everolimus is an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) widely used as an immunosuppressant in transplant patients. In transplantation setting, several recommendations for therapeutic drug monitoring are available, due to potential drug-drug interactions with chronic medication, which can affect everolimus pharmacokinetic profile. Everolimus is also used in breast, neuroendocrine and renal cancer, at higher doses than in transplantation and without systematic drug monitoring requirement. We present a case-report of a 72years-old woman with epilepsy history to whom everolimus 10mg/daily was prescribed as third line of treatment for renal cell carcinoma. The patient´s chronic medication was checked by the outpatient hospital pharmacist before initiating treatment. As a result, two major interactions with inducers of CYP3A4 metabolism as carbamazepine and phenytoin were detected. Since trough plasma concentration of everolimus could be affected, by these pharmacokinetic interactions,a therapeutic drug monitoring of everolimus was proposed. Based on the literature, Cmin plasma concentration (Cminss) of everolimus over 10ng/ml is associated with better response to treatment and progression free survival. During the oncologist follow-up visit and according to pharmaceutical recommendations, everolimus dosage was increased to 10mg every 12 hours. In the following determinations of trough plasma everolimus concentration, Cmin grow up from 3.7ng/ml to 10.8ng/mL. Depending on the CYP3A4 induction capacity and potency of the drug/s administered concomitant to everolimus and how many of them can potentially interact with it, therapeutic everolimus monitoring would be advisable in order to adjust dosage if required to prevent underexposure.