(1) Background: Chronic endometritis (CE) is a chronic disease of the endometrium characterized by inflammatory infiltration into the endometrial stroma. The diagnosis of CE is complex. Clinical examination and transvaginal ultrasound are not specific for CE. Biopsy is an indispensable tool. Two specific populations can be analyzed at the endometrial level: CD138 positive plasma cells and CD56 positive Natural Killer cells. (2) Methods: Our narrative review was based on an online search with a focus on the last ten years of literature in the English language. (3) Results: Twenty studies on CD138 positive plasma cells and 16 articles on CD56 positive Natural Killer cells highlighted the correlations of CE with diagnostic possibilities and reproductive outcomes. (4) Conclusions: The etiological pathway and management of CE require further scientific studies and investigations. Hysteroscopy is the diagnostic gold standard, but other blind biopsy techniques (i.e., Perma, Pipelle, Novak, etc.) and molecular procedures may help in the diagnosis of chronic endometritis.

Background/Objectives: Osteopontin (OPN) is a 34 kDa protein that is extensively phosphorylated and rich in aspartic acid, produced by a single-copy gene, and altered by post-translational processes. In several diseases, OPN has been discovered to play a direct role in immunological and inflammatory responses. It is also important in kidney stone disease, preeclampsia, cardiovascular disease, endometriosis, and cancer, among other pathological conditions. It is a crucial extracellular matrix molecule involved in oncology, due to its ability to bridge the gap between inflammation and carcinogenesis. Methods: Our systematic review has as PICO “Does Osteopontin have possible etiological and prognostic correlations in patients affected by endometrial carcinoma?” Based on online data collected from PubMed, Scholar, Embase, Scopus, and other sources, a preliminary analysis was conducted. A keyword search for “Osteopontin” AND “tumors”, “endometrial cancer”, and other related terms was used to identify the publications. The relevance of scientific research was used to select articles in English. Results: For our systematic review, the citation search yielded nine articles on the topic. At the endometrial level, OPN plays a role in a variety of biological processes, including angiogenesis, metastasis, altered tissue remodeling, immunological responses, cell adhesion, and migration. Conclusions: With established direct correlations and a potential role in the assessment of the diagnosis and prognosis of the disease, OPN participates in endometrial cancer, drawing more and more attention from researchers.

The role of blind endometrial sampling, in the era of hysteroscopy-guided biopsy, can be only considered as a screening tool or a first-line approach if a hysteroscopy cannot be performed for whatever reason. Several devices are available, with Perma (a sharp-edged spatula sliding inside a flexible cannula) being one of them. Objectives: The aims of this study were to compare the concordance of blind to visual endometrial sampling, and the influence of operators’ experience on the results. Materials and Methods: Women undergoing hysteroscopy were invited to undergo a Perma biopsy as well. If accepted, a Perma sampling was performed before the hysteroscopy and only if there was no cervical dilatation (as an office setting). The operator was randomly chosen between expert (two staff members) and non-expert (two residents) operators. All cases were collected at the AOU Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy. Categorical variables were presented in number and percentage (%) and continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD. The association between categorical variables was evaluated using Fisher’s exact test. Clinical outcomes were analyzed, and the results were first compared within the same patient and subsequent within the doctors’ group (inter- and intra-variation) in terms of Cohen’s Kappa. Results: 82 women performed both hysteroscopy and Perma. A sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 100% was found when Perma was compared to hysteroscopy (the gold standard). The comparison between valid vs. invalid samples in terms of sufficient evaluable tissue was not significant (p = 0.583). There are no statistical associations with body mass index, parity, or previous intrauterine surgery related to the outcomes of hysteroscopy and Perma. Cohen’s Kappa between non-experts was 0.43 (moderate), between experts was 0.30 (fair), with the highest concordance being between one non- and one expert (0.68 = substantial). Perma represents a pragmatic diagnostic tool, which could also be used in outpatient.