The discipline of anaesthesiology in China has undergone historical changes and development during the past century. However, nationwide comprehensive data on the current status of each hospital department providing anaesthesia care has been lacking since the discipline was first established in China. This information is essential for effective regulation of healthcare policies by both the professional associations and the government health ministry. Therefore, a nationwide survey was set up in 2018 to investigate the current status of Chinese anaesthesiology. This paper reports the findings of the survey. We performed a cross-sectional nationwide census survey of the current status of each hospital department providing anaesthesia care in 31 provinces across the Chinese mainland. The content of the survey included general information of the department, the hospital level and scale, the volume of the anaesthesiology department, the characteristics of anaesthesiologists, and the caseload of the anaesthesiology departments. Face-to-face interviews were performed by trained interviewers. The Chinese Anaesthesiology Department Tracking Database (CADTD) was established during the survey. Data quality control was undertaken by the investigation committee throughout the survey process. The nationwide census survey was completed by 11,432 hospital departments providing anaesthesia care throughout mainland China from June 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. Among the 11,432 departments, 4591 (40•16%) belonged to specialised hospitals, while 6841 (59•84%) were affiliated to general hospitals. The proportion of independent anaesthesiology departments was 45•15% in mainland China. There was a total of 92,726 anaesthesiologists, or 6•7 per 100,000 of the population. Regions with better economic conditions had more anaesthesiologists per 100,000 of the population. From 2015 to 2017, the workload of anaesthesiologists has increased by 10%. The discipline of anaesthesiology in China has entered a rapid development phase. However, the current status of anaesthesiology is not well defined, which makes it difficult to meet the needs of the increasing Chinese healthcare demand. The evidence from this survey offers valuable information for policy makers and anaesthesiology associations to monitor the development of the discipline and regulate healthcare policies effectively. National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC2001900).

BACKGROUND: A protective intra-operative lung ventilation strategy has been widely recommended for laparoscopic surgery. However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and its effects during pneumoperitoneum. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has recently been introduced as a bedside tool to monitor lung ventilation in real-time. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesised that individually titrated EIT-PEEP adjusted to the surgical intervention would improve respiratory mechanics during and after surgery. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: First Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing. PATIENTS: Seventy-five patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery under general anaesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned 2 : 1 to individualised EIT-titrated PEEP (PEEP_EIT; n = 50) or traditional PEEP 5 cmH₂O (PEEP_5 cmH2O; n = 25). The PEEP_EIT group received individually titrated EIT-PEEP during pneumoperitoneum. The PEEP_5 cmH2O group received PEEP of 5 cmH₂O during pneumoperitoneum. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was respiratory system compliance during laparoscopic surgery. Secondary outcomes were individualised PEEP levels, oxygenation, respiratory and haemodynamic status, and occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) within 7 days. RESULTS: Compared with PEEP_5 cmH2O, patients who received PEEP_EIT had higher respiratory system compliance (mean values during surgery of 44.3 ± 11.3 vs. 31.9 ± 6.6, ml cmH₂O⁻¹; P < 0.001), lower driving pressure (11.5 ± 2.1 vs. 14.0 ± 2.4 cmH₂O; P < 0.001), better oxygenation (mean P _aO₂/FiO₂ 427.5 ± 28.6 vs. 366.8 ± 36.4; P = 0.003), and less postoperative atelectasis (19.4 ± 1.6 vs. 46.3 ± 14.8 g of lung tissue mass; P = 0.003). Haemodynamic values did not differ significantly between the groups. No adverse effects were observed during surgery. CONCLUSION: Individualised PEEP by EIT may improve intra-operative pulmonary mechanics and oxygenation without impairing haemodynamic stability, and decrease postoperative atelectasis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn) identifier: ChiCTR2100045166.

Background: Clonidine is an anesthetic with favorable efficacy and safety profiles for caudal epidural block, but comparisons with other adjuvants need to be confirmed in pediatric patients.Aim: To investigate the effects of clonidine as an adjuvant in caudal epidural block to improve the intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in pediatric surgery.Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for available papers published up to February 2021. The outcomes were pain score, duration of analgesia, complications, and number of analgesic requirements. The meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models.Results: Fifteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. There were no differences between clonidine and the control drug regarding the duration of analgesia (SMD = −0.71, 95%CI: −1.64, 0.23; I² = 95.5%, P_{heterogeneity} < 0.001), pain score (SMD = 0.35, 95%CI: −0.28, 0.98; I² = 80.8%, P_{heterogeneity} < 0.001), and requirement for additional analgesia (OR = 8.77, 95%CI: 0.70, 110.58, I² = 81.9%, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.004), but using clonidine resulted in fewer complications than the control drugs (OR = 0.33, 95%CI: 0.20, 0.54, I² = 21.8%, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.217). The sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust. A publication bias was observed.Conclusion: Clonidine has the same efficacy as the other adjuvants for caudal epidural block for pediatric surgery but fewer complications. These results support clonidine as an adjuvant to local anesthetic, but additional studies should be conducted.

Background: Topical anesthesia is a crucial step in awake endotracheal intubation for providing favorable intubation conditions. The standard of care technique for awake intubation at our institution, which consists of oropharyngeal tetracaine spray, can result in inadequate mucosal anesthesia. Therefore, we sought to compare the effectiveness of dyclonine hydrochloride mucilage to the standard of care tetracaine in achieving anesthesia of the upper airways for awake endotracheal intubation. Methods: This is a randomized, assessor-blinded, prospective study. From Jun. 1st, 2019 to Aug. 1st, 2019, patients scheduled for either endoscopic submucosal dissection or peroral endoscopic myotomy were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups after obtaining written informed consent: patients allocated to novel awake intubation care (Group N-AIC) received a single administration of oral dyclonine hydrochloride mucilage, whereas patients allocated to standard awake intubation care (Group S-AIC) received three oropharyngeal tetracaine sprays before transcricoid tetracaine injection before awake intubation. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), which was the primary outcome of this study, as well as heart rate (HR) were recorded throughout the procedure and compared between the two groups. Feeling of numbness, nausea, and intubation conditions after topical anesthesia were also assessed. Results: Sixty patients were enrolled and completed the study. Baseline MAP and HR were similar between the two groups. However, hemodynamic responses to intubation and gastrointestinal endoscopy, especially MAP, were significantly less elevated in Group N-AIC. The degree of numbness of the oropharyngeal mucosa after topical anesthesia did not differ between the two groups, neither did the feeling of nausea during laryngoscopy. The amount of pharyngeal secretions before intubation was less in Group N-AIC. Total intubation time was significantly shorter in Group N-AIC when compared to Group S-AIC (18.4 ± 2.86 vs. 22.3 ± 6.47, P < 0.05). Extubation bucking was significantly less frequent in Group N-AIC (13.3% vs. 76.7%). Patients received in Group N-AIC had a lower rate of post-extubation sore throat compared to Group S-AIC (6.7% vs. 43.3%). No adverse side effects attributable to either tetracaine or dyclonine were observed in this study. Conclusions: In awake endotracheal intubation, novel care using oral dyclonine hydrochloride mucilage can provide more favorable mucosal anesthesia and better intubation conditions compared to standard of care practice using oropharyngeal tetracaine spray. Trial registration: ChiCTR1900023151. Date of registration: May 14th, 2019.

Objective: The ideal intra-operative inspired oxygen concentration remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the association between the intraoperative fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients undergoing non-cardiothoracic surgery.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of elderly patients who underwent non-cardiothoracic surgery between April 2020 and January 2022. According to intraoperative FiO₂, patients were divided into low (≤60%) and high (>60%) FiO₂ groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of a composite of pulmonary complications (PPCs) within the first seven postoperative days. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) were conducted to adjust for baseline characteristic differences between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios (OR) for FiO₂ and PPCs.Results: Among the 3,515 included patients with a median age of 70 years (interquartile range: 68–74), 492 (14%) experienced PPCs within the first 7 postoperative days. Elevated FiO₂ was associated with an increased risk of PPCs in all the logistic regression models. The OR of the FiO₂ > 60% group was 1.252 (95%CI, 1.015–1.551, P = 0.038) in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate logistic regression models, the ORs of the FiO₂ > 60% group were 1.259 (Model 2), 1.314 (Model 3), and 1.32 (model 4). A balanced covariate distribution between the two groups was created using PSM or IPTW. The correlation between elevated FiO₂ and an increased risk of PPCs remained statistically significant with PSM analysis (OR, 1.393; 95% CI, 1.077–1.804; P = 0.012) and IPTW analysis (OR, 1.266; 95% CI, 1.086–1.476; P = 0.003).Conclusion: High intraoperative FiO₂ (>60%) was associated with the postoperative occurrence of pulmonary complications, independent of predefined risk factors, in elderly non-cardiothoracic surgery patients. High intraoperative FiO₂ should be applied cautiously in surgical patients vulnerable to PPCs.