David Levinson

Prof. David Levinson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 June 2007 in Geographical Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FXFeng Xie
Feng Xie
David LevinsonDavid Levinson
David Levinson

1 March 1998 in Journal of Transport Geography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
David LevinsonDavid Levinson
David Levinson

1 September 2016 in Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AEAhmed El-Geneidy
Ahmed El-Geneidy
David LevinsonDavid Levinson
David Levinson
EDEhab Diab
Ehab Diab
GBGenevieve Boisjoly
Genevieve Boisjoly
DVDavid Verbich
David Verbich
CLCharis Loong
Charis Loong

1 May 2012 in Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CCCarlos Carrion
Carlos Carrion
David LevinsonDavid Levinson
David Levinson

6 March 2018 in Transport Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AEAlireza Ermagun
Alireza Ermagun
David LevinsonDavid Levinson
David Levinson
This paper systematically reviews studies that forecast short-term traffic conditions using spatial dependence between links. We extract and synthesise 130 research papers, considering two perspectives: (1) methodological framework and (2) methods for capturing spatial information. Spatial information boosts the accuracy of prediction, particularly in congested traffic regimes and for longer horizons. Machine learning methods, which have attracted more attention in recent years, outperform the naïve statistical methods such as historical average and exponential smoothing. However, there is no guarantee of superiority when machine learning methods are compared with advanced statistical methods such as spatiotemporal autoregressive integrated moving average. As for the spatial dependency detection, a large gulf exists between the realistic spatial dependence of traffic links on a real network and the studied networks as follows: (1) studies capture spatial dependency of either adjacent or distant upstream and downstream links with the study link, (2) the spatially relevant links are selected either by prejudgment or by correlation-coefficient analysis, and (3) studies develop forecasting methods in a corridor test sample, where all links are connected sequentially together, assume a similarity between the behaviour of both parallel and adjacent links, and overlook the competitive nature of traffic links.

1 January 2010 in Transport Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
David LevinsonDavid Levinson
David Levinson
Are road pricing strategies regressive or progressive? This is a question that has been confronting researchers, practitioners, and policy‐makers who seek to implement new mechanisms to raise funds for transportation while simultaneously managing demand. The theoretical literature is mixed, as is the empirical literature. In part, this has to do with the various types of road pricing strategies that are being debated, different definitions of equity, and alternative assumptions about revenue recycling. Despite this seeming complexity, the literature is clear that equity issues are addressable. This paper provides a synthesis of the literature to date on both the theory of equity, as applied to road pricing, and the findings of empirical and simulation studies of the effects of particular implementations of road pricing, and suggested remedies for real or perceived inequities. To summarize, while there are certainly potential issues with equity associated with road pricing, those issues can be addressed with intelligent mechanism design that provides the right incentives to travellers and uses the raised revenues in a way to achieve desired equitable ends. These include cutting other taxes and investing in infrastructure and services.