Mitochondrial respiration is an energy producing process that involves the coordinated action of several protein complexes embedded in the inner membrane to finally produce ATP. Complex IV or Cytochrome c Oxidase (COX) is the last electron acceptor of the respiratory chain, involved in the reduction of O₂ to H₂O. COX is a multimeric complex formed by multiple structural subunits encoded in two different genomes, prosthetic groups (heme a and heme a₃), and metallic centers (Cu_A and Cu_B). Tens of accessory proteins are required for mitochondrial RNA processing, synthesis and delivery of prosthetic groups and metallic centers, and for the final assembly of subunits to build a functional complex. In this review, we perform a comparative analysis of COX composition and biogenesis factors in yeast, mammals and plants. We also describe possible external and internal factors controlling the expression of structural proteins and assembly factors at the transcriptional and post-translational levels, and the effect of deficiencies in different steps of COX biogenesis to infer the role of COX in different aspects of plant development. We conclude that COX assembly in plants has conserved and specific features, probably due to the incorporation of a different set of subunits during evolution.

Plant mitochondria are complex organelles that carry out numerous metabolic processes related with the generation of energy for cellular functions and the synthesis and degradation of several compounds. Mitochondria are semiautonomous and dynamic organelles changing in shape, number and composition depending on tissue or developmental stage. The biogenesis of functional mitochondria requires the coordination of genes present both in the nucleus and the organelle. In addition, due to their central role, all processes held inside mitochondria must be finely coordinated with those in other organelles according to cellular demands. Coordination is achieved by transcriptional control of nuclear genes encoding mitochondrial proteins by specific transcription factors that recognize conserved elements in their promoter regions. In turn, the expression of most of these transcription factors is linked to developmental and environmental cues, according to the availability of nutrients, light-dark cycles and warning signals generated in response to stress conditions. Among the signals impacting in the expression of nuclear genes, retrograde signals that originate inside mitochondria help to adjust mitochondrial biogenesis to organelle demands. Adding more complexity, several nuclear encoded proteins are dual localized to mitochondria and either chloroplasts or the nucleus. Dual targeting might establish a crosstalk between the nucleus and cell organelles to ensure a fine coordination of cellular activities. In this article, we discuss how the different levels of coordination of mitochondrial biogenesis interconnect to optimize the function of the organelle according to both internal and external demands.

The vast diversity of traits exhibited by horticultural crops largely depends upon variation in gene expression regulation. The uppermost layer of gene expression regulation is chromatin compaction. In plants, the LIKE HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN 1 (LHP1) is a member of the Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) that controls the spreading of the H3K27me3 mark throughout the genome to regulate gene expression. Much of the epigenetic control exerted by LHP1 has been deeply explored on the model species Arabidopsis thaliana. Recent advances in melon, tomato, and soybean highlight the relevance of LHP1 in controlling the development and physiology of a plethora of traits in crops. However, whether LHP1 exerts its diverse roles through similar mechanisms and through modulating the same target genes has been overlooked. In this review, we gather a wealth of knowledge about the LHP1 mode of action, which involves a tight connection with histone marks and long noncoding RNAs to modulate gene expression. Strikingly, we found that LHP1 may be linked to H3K27me3 regulation across the plant lineage, yet, through epigenetic regulation of a distinct set of target genes. This is supported by subtle differences in subcellular LHP1 localization between species found here. In addition, we summarize the variety of developmental outputs modulated by LHP1 across land plants pinpointing its importance for plant breeding. Hence, LHP1 has probably been co-opted in different lineages to modulate diverse traits contributing to crop diversification.