Head and neck cancer (HNC) is an ascending and agressive disease. The search for new molecular markers is emerging to solve difficulties in diagnosis, risk management, prognosis and effectiveness of treatments. Proteins related to apoptotic machinery have been identified as potential biomarkers. Caspase 3 is the main effector caspase and has a key role in apoptosis. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to review studies that analyze changes in Caspase 3 and Cleaved Caspase 3 expression both in oral premalignant disorders (OPMD) as well as in head and neck cancer (HNC). This study also proposes to review the prognostic values associated with HNC according to the expression of Caspase 3. Medline (via PubMed), EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science and Grey Literature Database were screened from inception to june of 2022 and 18 studies were selected and 8 were included in the prognostic meta-analysis. Results related to the comparison of Caspase 3 expression demonstrated similar expression of Caspase 3 in HNC, with an average of 51.9% (9.5–98.1) showing high/moderate expression compared to 45.7% (14.6–84.7) in OPMD. Of interest, Cleaved Caspase 3 resulted incresed in HNC when compared with OPMD, being 73.3% (38.6–88.3) versus 22.9% (7.1–38.7). Pooled Fixed effect of HR values (95% CI) for OS related to Caspase 3 IHC expression in HNC patients was 1.48 (95% CI 0.95–2.28); also, the rate of heterogeneity was low, as revealed by I² = 31%. For DFS was 1.07 (95% CI 0.79–1.45) with I² = 0% and DSS showed a HR of 0.88 (95% CI 0.69–1.12) with I² = 37%. Caspase 3 and Cleaved Caspase 3 expression could be linked with malignancy progression, but the expression of Caspase 3 did not influence the prognosis of patients with HNC.

One of the most promising approaches to correct periodontal bone defects and achieve periodontal regeneration is platelet-rich fibrin (PRF). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the regeneration of periodontal bone defects using PRF compared to other regenerative treatments. The data search and retrieval process followed the PRISMA guidelines. An electronic search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases was performed, selecting exclusively randomized clinical trials where the following were measured: probing depth reduction (PD), clinical attachment level gain (CAL), and radiographic bone fill (RBF). Out of 284 selected articles, 32 were chosen based on inclusion criteria. The use of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) + open flap debridement (OFD), PRF + metformin, PRF + platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and PRF + OFD/bone graft (BG) significantly reduced PD and improved CAL and RBF. However, the combination of PRF + BG, PRF + metformin, and PRF + STATINS reduced CAL. The intervention of PRF combined with different treatments such as metformin, OFD, PRP, BG, and STATINS has a significant impact on improving PD and CAL. The use of PRF significantly improved the regeneration of periodontal bone defects compared to other treatments.

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is characterized by poor survival, mostly due to local invasion, loco-regional recurrence, and metastasis. Given that the weakening of cell-to-cell adhesion is a feature associated with the migration and invasion of cancer cells, different studies have explored the prognostic utility of cell adhesion molecules such as E-cadherin (E-cad). This study aims to summarize current evidence in a meta-analysis, focusing on the prognostic role of E-cad in OSCC. To find studies meeting inclusion criteria, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, Medline, and OpenGrey databases were systematically assessed and screened. The selection process led to 25 studies, which were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis, representing a sample of 2553 patients. E-cad overexpression was strongly associated with longer overall survival (OS) with Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.41 95% confidence interval (95% CI) (0.32–0.54); p < 0.001 and disease-free survival with HR 0.47 95% CI (0.37–0.61); p < 0.001. In terms of OS, patients with tongue cancer experienced better survivability when expressing E-cad with HR 0.28 95% CI (0.19–0.43); p < 0.001. Globally, our findings indicate the prognostic role of the immunohistochemical assessment of E-cad in OSCC and its expression might acquire a different role based on the oral cavity subsites.

Background: Tumor‐stroma ratio (TSR) has been recognized as a significant prognostic factor in various cancers. This systematic review evaluates the role of TSR in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and its association with patient outcomes such as overall survival (OS), disease‐free survival (DFS), disease‐specific survival (DSS), and lymph node metastasis (LNM).Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. Nineteen studies were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed progressively, with meta‐analyses. All studies assessed TSR using hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue samples. The meta‐analyses focused on the impact of TSR on OS, DFS, DSS, and LNM, providing pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding confidence intervals (CIs).Results: Meta‐analysis revealed a significant association between TSR and OS (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.71–2.32, p < 0.001), DFS (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.80–2.39, p < 0.001), DSS (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.95–2.78, p < 0.001), and LNM (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.15–2.70, p = 0.01). Minimal to low heterogeneity was detected among studies, and no publication bias was observed.Conclusions: TSR can effectively identify high‐risk patients, being a reliable prognostic marker that could be readily integrated into routine pathology practice for HNSCC.

Background: Torque teno virus (TTV) is not known to cause disease in humans; however, chronic inflammatory conditions and immunosuppression states can favour TTV replication. This study aimed to verify the effectiveness of TTV as an immune biomarker.Methods: The protocol of this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022331049) and performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines.Results: Thirty‐three articles were selected and different groups of patients were assessed. In the solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant groups, most studies reported that TTV viral load (VL) was highly detectable after transplantation and compared to controls, but the association with immune parameters showed conflicting results. In melanoma patients, no statistical difference in TTV VL was identified between susceptible and treatment‐resistant patients. In lung cancer patients, viral load increases significantly with disease progression but decreases after chemotherapy. HIV‐positive patients showed a higher VL than controls, but an inverse correlation with CD4+ was observed in half of the studies. Although 57.14% of all studies presented a low risk of bias, significant differences were observed between studies, particularly in the choice of the analyzed outcome, the parameter used to evaluate the patient's immune status, the presence of a control group, and the sample collection time points.Conclusions: Although TTV seems to have the potential to be a promising biomarker of immunosuppression, further high‐quality prospective clinical studies are still needed.

Introduction: Gingival recession, characterized by the apical displacement of the gingival margin, presents challenges to oral health. This study compares the effectiveness of the coronally advanced flap (CAF) and the tunnel technique (TT) for treating gingival recessions. Methods: Bibliographical searches included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, and the grey literature, with keywords “root coverage” “coronary advanced flap”, and “tunnel”. A systematic coreview was performed that included 26 studies evaluating root coverage, and 14 articles were included for the meta-analysis. Three groups were analyzed: Group 1 compared TT with connective tissue graft (CTG) versus CAF with CTG; Group 2 examined TT with CTG and/or other biomaterials versus TT with CTG alone; Group 3 compared TT with CAF, regardless of complementary biomaterials. Meta-analysis assessed mean root coverage (MRC), complete root coverage (CRC), and keratinized tissue gain (KTG). Results: In Group 1, TT with CTG demonstrated superior MRC compared with CAF with CTG (−8.68 CI95% −17.19 to −0.17; p = 0.0457). In Group 2, TT with CTG and/or other biomaterials showed similar MRC (4.17 CI95% −17.91 to 26.26; p = 0.7110) and CRC (0.37 CI95% −1.14 to 1.89; p = 0.6269) to TT with CTG alone, with variations in keratinized tissue gain. Group 3 indicated higher potential MRC for TT compared with CAF (5.73 CI95% −8.90 to 13.55; p = 0.685) but without statistically significant differences. Conclusions: This study suggests that TT with CTG might offer better root coverage than CAF with CTG; however, biomaterial selection requires consideration.