The increasing level of anthropogenic CO₂ in the atmosphere has made it imperative to investigate an efficient method for carbon sequestration. Geological carbon sequestration presents a viable path to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions by sequestering the captured CO₂ deep underground in rock formations to store it permanently. Geochemistry, as the cornerstone of geological CO₂ sequestration (GCS), plays an indispensable role. Therefore, it is not just timely but also urgent to undertake a comprehensive review of studies conducted in this area, articulate gaps and findings, and give directions for future research areas. This paper reviews geochemistry in terms of the sequestration of CO₂ in geological formations, addressing mechanisms of trapping, challenges, and ways of mitigating challenges in trapping mechanisms; mineralization and methods of accelerating mineralization; and the interaction between rock, brine, and CO₂ for the long-term containment and storage of CO₂. Mixing CO₂ with brine before or during injection, using microbes, selecting sedimentary reservoirs with reactive minerals, co-injection of carbonate anhydrase, and enhancing the surface area of reactive minerals are some of the mechanisms used to enhance mineral trapping in GCS applications. This review also addresses the potential challenges and opportunities associated with geological CO₂ storage. Challenges include caprock integrity, understanding the lasting effects of storing CO₂ on geological formations, developing reliable models for monitoring CO₂–brine–rock interactions, CO₂ impurities, and addressing public concerns about safety and environmental impacts. Conversely, opportunities in the sequestration of CO₂ lie in the vast potential for storing CO₂ in geological formations like depleted oil and gas reservoirs, saline aquifers, coal seams, and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) sites. Opportunities include improved geochemical trapping of CO₂, optimized storage capacity, improved sealing integrity, managed wellbore leakage risk, and use of sealant materials to reduce leakage risk. Furthermore, the potential impact of advancements in geochemical research, understanding geochemical reactions, addressing the challenges, and leveraging the opportunities in GCS are crucial for achieving sustainable carbon mitigation and combating global warming effectively.

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology presents a practical solution for reducing industrial carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions through underground anthropogenic CO₂ storage in depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs. The long-term storage efficiency faces several CO₂ leakage challenges that need to be addressed in the planning phase of the CCS project. Thus, effective risk assessment (RA) methodologies are crucial for ensuring safety, regulatory compliance, and public acceptance of CCS projects. This review examines RA parts and their corresponding technical and non-technical challenges. The analysis critically compares over 20 qualitative, semi-quantitative, quantitative, and hybrid RA techniques employed throughout GCS operations. Available quantitative RA tools do not deliver dependable results because they require technical data that become available late in the CCS project development process. Qualitative approaches work well for the initial screening of storage sites with limited data available, yet quantitative methods enable quantification of CO₂ leakage. For the first time, a comparative analysis of two integrated assessment tools is presented in this paper. The techniques achieve success based on high-quality data and analysis of existing technical and non-technical challenges which this paper examines. The comparative analysis outlines the limitations and advantages of every methodology studied and emphasizes the need for integrated hybrid frameworks to boost decision-making in the RA process. Future research should focus on creating or improving existing hybrid frameworks for late-stage RA while utilizing qualitative frameworks in the initial site screening stage to advance GSC’s safe and effective implementation.

Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) is one potential solution that could provide a steady source of clean energy to the globe. Given their infrastructure, depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs may be a suitable storage option. However, ensuring wellbore integrity is a significant challenge when storing hydrogen in such reservoirs. In this study, 3.81 × 7.62 cm cement samples were cured for 12 and 18 months and were cyclically exposed to hydrogen for three 28-day cycles at 10.34 MPa and 50 °C. The pressure increment was achieved at the rate of 2.06 MPa/hr. The cement’s porosity, permeability, and ultrasonic velocity were tested before and after each cycle. To investigate the changes in the surface structure and elemental composition, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was conducted. The results illustrate increased porosity and permeability, but the ultrasonic velocity changes were insignificant. The SEM images do not exhibit any change in the microstructure. However, energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) mapping exhibited mineral dissolution. This study demonstrates how cyclic exposure to hydrogen will affect the integrity and the sealing ability of aged cement, which will be an essential factor to consider while repurposing existing oil and gas wells to hydrogen injectors or producers for UHS applications in depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs.