Objectives: The European Society of Cardiology endorsed SCORE2 to assess cardiovascular risk. The aim of this observational, retrospective study was to assess whether SCORE2 is associated with colorectal neoplasia in an asymptomatic screening population. Further, we evaluated if SCORE2 predicts tumor-related mortality. Methods: We included 3408 asymptomatic patients who underwent a screening colonoscopy. We calculated SCORE2 for each participant and stratified patients according to their predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: SCORE2 0–4.9%, SCORE2 5–9.9%, and SCORE2 ≥ 10%. We assessed the association between SCORE2 as a continuous variable, the presence of colorectal neoplasia using multilevel logistic regression, and SCORE2 and mortality using Cox regression. Results: In total, 1537 patients had a SCORE2 of 0–4.9%, 1235 a SCORE2 of 5–9.9%, and 636 a SCORE2 ≥ 10%. The respective rates of colorectal neoplasia were 20%, 37%, and 44%. SCORE2 was associated with the presence of any (OR 1.11 95%CI 1.09–1.12; p < 0.001) and advanced colorectal neoplasia (OR 1.06 95%CI 1.08–1.13; p < 0.001) in univariate analysis. After multivariable adjustment (age, sex, family history, and metabolic syndrome) a higher SCORE2 remained associated with higher odds for any (aOR 1.04 95%CI 1.02–1.06; p = 0.001) and advanced (aOR 1.06 95%CI 1.03–1.10; p < 0.001) colorectal neoplasia. SCORE2 was associated with both all-cause (HR 1.11 95%CI 1.09–1.14; p < 0.001) and tumor-related mortality (HR 1.10 95%CI 1.05–1.14; p < 0.001). Conclusions: We found that SCORE2 is associated with the presence of colorectal neoplasia. Clinicians could kill two birds with one stone calculating SCORE2. In patients with a high SCORE2, screening colonoscopy aside from cardiovascular risk mitigation could improve outcomes.

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with systemic inflammation and increased risk of cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities. The relationship between RA and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has not been established in population-based studies. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 6638 participants from the population-based Paracelsus 10,000 cohort in Austria, including 187 individuals with physician-diagnosed RA meeting ACR/EULAR classification criteria. MASLD was defined using the Fatty Liver Index (≥ 60) combined with cardiometabolic risk factors according to 2024 EASL guidelines. We used Poisson regression models with sequential adjustment for demographic factors, metabolic syndrome, lifestyle factors, NSAID use, and cardiovascular risk (SCORE2). Liver fibrosis risk was assessed using the Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4). Results: MASLD prevalence was higher in RA patients than controls (41.2% vs. 28.5%, P < 0.001). In sequential regression models, the association between RA and MASLD persisted after adjustment for demographics (IRR, 1.55; 95% CI 1.33–1.82), metabolic and lifestyle factors (IRR, 1.20; 95% CI 1.03–1.40), and cardiovascular risk factors (IRR, 1.35; 95% CI 1.14–1.60; P < 0.001). In addition, RA patients showed elevated liver fibrosis markers (median FIB-4: 1.21 vs. 1.08; P < 0.001). Conclusions: In this population-based cohort, RA was independently associated with a 35% increased risk of MASLD and elevated liver fibrosis markers. These findings suggest that systematic liver assessment should be considered in the routine care of RA patients.

Background: Colorectal neoplasia and diverticulosis are common findings on colonoscopies. While adenomas are precursors to colorectal cancer, diverticulosis is usually asymptomatic but can lead to diverticulitis. Despite their prevalence and coexistence, the relationship between these conditions remains unclear. This study investigates whether diverticulosis is associated with adenomas, considering shared risk factors and potential inflammation-driven mechanisms. Methods: We examined 6154 asymptomatic individuals undergoing colorectal cancer screening in Austria. Diverticulosis and colorectal neoplasia were documented during screenings based on macroscopic definitions. Advanced neoplasia was defined as polyps >1 cm or high-grade dysplasia. Associations between diverticulosis and neoplastic findings were assessed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Although the overall incidence of any polypoid lesion was higher in the diverticulosis group (37% vs. 30%), statistical analysis revealed a comparable rate of advanced neoplasms in both groups. Importantly, no significant link between diverticulosis and advanced neoplasms was found (OR 1.125; 95% CI: 0.933 to 1.357, p = 0.218) even after adjusting for confounding factors. In a univariate analysis, a statistically significant association between diverticulosis and the presence of any colorectal polyps was identified (OR 1.388; 95% CI: 1.244–1.549, p < 0.0001). However, after adjusting for confounding factors in model 2 (OR 1.065, 95% CI: 0.942 to 1.204, p = 0.314) and model 3 (OR 1.071, 95% CI: 0.925 to 1.239, p = 0.360), this effect was also not statistically significant. Conclusions: Patients with diverticulosis share demographic and clinical features with those at risk of colorectal neoplasia, such as older age, male gender, and higher cardiometabolic risk. However, diverticulosis does not independently increase the risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia or unspecified polypoid lesions.

Background: The aim of this retrospective observational study was to examine the relationship between SCORE2 and the occurrence of colonic diverticula in a screening population without cardiovascular or gastrointestinal symptoms. SCORE2, recognized and supported by the European Society of Cardiology for cardiovascular risk assessment, served as the primary metric for the analysis in this investigation. Methods: We studied 3935 asymptomatic individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy. SCORE2 was calculated for each participant and categorized into three groups based on the following projected 10-year cardiovascular disease risk: SCORE2 0–4.9%, SCORE2 5–9.9%, and SCORE2 ≥ 10%. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between SCORE2 and diverticulosis. Results: SCORE2 was associated with the presence of diverticulosis (OR 1.09, 95%CI 1.07–1.10; p < 0.001) in univariable logistic regression, translating into an RR of 1.07 per unit increase. The association persisted after multivariable adjusting for metabolic syndrome (aOR 1.08; 95%CI 1.06–1.10; p < 0.001). Patients with high cardiovascular risk had higher rates of diverticulosis compared to those with lower risk: high risk (OR 2.00, 95%CI 1.71–2.33; p < 0.001); very high risk (OR 2.53, 95%CI 2.10–3.05; p < 0.001). This association remained after adjusting for metabolic syndrome: high risk (aOR 1.86, 95%CI 1.59–2.18; p < 0.001); very high risk (aOR 2.27, 95%CI 1.88–2.75; p < 0.001). Conclusions: A higher SCORE2 was found to be a suitable screening parameter for diverticular disease. This suggests a potential link between cardiovascular risk factors and colon diverticula development, warranting further research on whether optimizing cardiovascular risk factors could positively influence diverticular disease.