Samprit Banerjee

Dr. Samprit Banerjee


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2021 in Journal of Psychiatric Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCMarika Cusick
Marika Cusick
PAPrakash Adekkanattu
Prakash Adekkanattu
TCThomas R. Campion
Thomas R. Campion
ESEvan T. Sholle
Evan T. Sholle
AMAnnie Myers
Annie Myers
JPJyotishman Pathak
Jyotishman Pathak

18 March 2020 in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HGH.M.K. Ghomrawi
H.M.K. Ghomrawi
AMA.I. Mushlin
A.I. Mushlin
RKR. Kang
R. Kang
SBSamprit Banerjee
Samprit Banerjee
JSJasvinder Singh
Jasvinder Singh
DRD.L. Riddle
D.L. Riddle
Background: Patients with knee osteoarthritis may undergo total knee replacement too early or may delay or underuse this procedure. We quantified these categories of total knee replacement utilization in 2 cohorts of participants with knee osteoarthritis and investigated factors associated with each category. Methods: Data were pooled from 2 multicenter cohort studies that collected demographic, patient-reported, radiographic, clinical examination, and total knee replacement utilization information longitudinally on 8,002 participants who had or were at risk for knee osteoarthritis and were followed for up to 8 years. Validated total knee replacement appropriateness criteria were longitudinally applied to classify participants as either potentially appropriate or likely inappropriate for total knee replacement. Participants were further classified on the basis of total knee replacement utilization into 3 categories: timely (indicating that the patient had total knee replacement within 2 years after the procedure had become potentially appropriate), potentially appropriate but knee not replaced (indicating that the knee had remained unreplaced for >2 years after the procedure had become potentially appropriate), and premature (indicating that the procedure was likely inappropriate but had been performed). Utilization rates were calculated, and factors associated with each category were identified. Results: Among 8,002 participants, 3,417 knees fulfilled our inclusion and exclusion criteria and were classified into 1 of 3 utilization categories as follows: 290 knees (8% of the total and 9% of the knees for which replacement was potentially appropriate) were classified as “timely”, 2,833 knees (83% of the total and 91% of those for which replacement was potentially appropriate) were classified as “potentially appropriate but not replaced”, and 294 knees (comprising 9% of the total and 26% of the 1,114 total knee replacements performed) were considered to be “likely inappropriate” yet underwent total knee replacement and were classified as “premature”. Of the knees that were potentially appropriate but were not replaced, 1,204 (42.5%) had severe symptoms. Compared with the patients who underwent timely total knee replacement, the likelihood of being classified as potentially appropriate but not undergoing total knee replacement was greater for black participants and the likelihood of having premature total knee replacement was lower among participants with a body mass index of >25 kg/m2 and those with depression. Conclusions: In 2 multicenter cohorts of patients with knee osteoarthritis, we observed substantial numbers of patients who had premature total knee replacement as well as of patients for whom total knee replacement was potentially appropriate but had not been performed >2 years after it had become potentially appropriate. Further understanding of these observations is needed, especially among the latter group. Clinical Relevance: Undergoing total knee replacement too early may result in little or no benefit while exposing the patient to the risks of a major operation, whereas waiting too long may cause limitations in physical activity that in turn increase the risk of additional disability and chronic disease; however, little is known about timing of this surgery. We quantified the extent of premature, timely, and delayed use, and found a high prevalence of both premature and delayed use.

1 April 2019 in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PKPeter J. Kennel
Peter J. Kennel
JKJerard Kneifati-Hayek
Jerard Kneifati-Hayek
JBJoanna Bryan
Joanna Bryan
SBSamprit Banerjee
Samprit Banerjee
ISIrina Sobol
Irina Sobol
PGParag Goyal
Parag Goyal
While an expanding armamentarium of pharmacologic therapies has contributed to improved outcomes among adults with heart failure (HF) over the past two decades, this has also been accompanied by an increase in the number of medications taken by adults with HF. The use of at least 10 medications, defined as hyperpolypharmacy, is particularly notable given its association with adverse outcomes. We aimed to assess the prevalence and identify determinants of hyperpolypharmacy among adults with HF. We studied adults aged ≥50 years with self-reported HF from the National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) in 2003–2014. We calculated weighted means and percentages to describe patient characteristics. We conducted a multivariable Poisson regression analysis to identify factors independently associated with hyperpolypharmacy; we adjusted for survey sampling, socio-demographics, comorbidity, geriatric conditions, and health care utilization. We examined 947 participants, representing 4.6 million adults with HF. The prevalence of hyperpolypharmacy was 26%. In a multivariable regression analysis, comorbidity count, ≥10 ambulatory contacts, and ≥ 3 hospitalizations were independently associated with hyperpolypharmacy. Interestingly, functional impairment and cognitive impairment were not independently associated with hyperpolypharmacy; while low annual household income and low educational status were each associated with an almost 2-fold increase in hyperpolypharmacy. Hyperpolypharmacy is a common condition among adults with HF. We additionally found that low household income and low educational status are independently associated with hyperpolypharmacy, suggesting that non-medical factors may be contributing to this potentially harmful condition.

23 January 2013 in BMC Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMaria Poptsova
Maria Poptsova
SBSamprit Banerjee
Samprit Banerjee
OGOmer Gokcumen
Omer Gokcumen
MRMark A Rubin
Mark A Rubin
FDFrancesca Demichelis
Francesca Demichelis
Background: Inherited Copy Number Variants (CNVs) can modulate the expression levels of individual genes. However, little is known about how CNVs alter biological pathways and how this varies across different populations. To trace potential evolutionary changes of well-described biological pathways, we jointly queried the genomes and the transcriptomes of a collection of individuals with Caucasian, Asian or Yoruban descent combining high-resolution array and sequencing data. Results: We implemented an enrichment analysis of pathways accounting for CNVs and genes sizes and detected significant enrichment not only in signal transduction and extracellular biological processes, but also in metabolism pathways. Upon the estimation of CNV population differentiation (CNVs with different polymorphism frequencies across populations), we evaluated that 22% of the pathways contain at least one gene that is proximal to a CNV (CNV-gene pair) that shows significant population differentiation. The majority of these CNV-gene pairs belong to signal transduction pathways and 6% of the CNV-gene pairs show statistical association between the copy number states and the transcript levels. Conclusions: The analysis suggested possible examples of positive selection within individual populations including NF-kB, MAPK signaling pathways, and Alu/L1 retrotransposition factors. Altogether, our results suggest that constitutional CNVs may modulate subtle pathway changes through specific pathway enzymes, which may become fixed in some populations.

1 January 2021 in Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BCBilal Chughtai
Bilal Chughtai
JMJialin Mao
Jialin Mao
MMMichael E. Matheny
Michael E. Matheny
EMElizabeth Mauer
Elizabeth Mauer
SBSamprit Banerjee
Samprit Banerjee
ASArt Sedrakyan
Art Sedrakyan
Purpose:We examined long-term risks and predictors of mesh erosion and reoperation following mid urethral sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence.Materials and Methods:Women aged 18 years o...

31 January 2023 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PGParag Goyal
Parag Goyal
ESEdward Schenck
Edward Schenck
YWYiyuan Wu
Yiyuan Wu
YZYongkang Zhang
Yongkang Zhang
AVAayush Visaria
Aayush Visaria
SBSamprit Banerjee
Samprit Banerjee
While it is known that social deprivation index (SDI) plays an important role on risk for acquiring Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), the impact of SDI on in-hospital outcomes such as intubation and mortality are less well-characterized. We analyzed electronic health record data of adults hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19 between March 1, 2020 and February 8, 2021 from the INSIGHT Clinical Research Network (CRN). To compute the SDI (exposure variable), we linked clinical data using patient’s residential zip-code with social data at zip-code tabulation area. SDI is a composite of seven socioeconomic characteristics determinants at the zip-code level. For this analysis, we categorized SDI into quintiles. The two outcomes of interest were in-hospital intubation and mortality. For each outcome, we examined logistic regression and random forests to determine incremental value of SDI in predicting outcomes. We studied 30,016 included COVID-19 patients. In a logistic regression model for intubation, a model including demographics, comorbidity, and vitals had an Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) = 0.73 (95% CI 0.70–0.75); the addition of SDI did not improve prediction [AUROC = 0.73 (95% CI 0.71–0.75)]. In a logistic regression model for in-hospital mortality, demographics, comorbidity, and vitals had an AUROC = 0.80 (95% CI 0.79–0.82); the addition of SDI in Model 2 did not improve prediction [AUROC = 0.81 (95% CI 0.79–0.82)]. Random forests revealed similar findings. SDI did not provide incremental improvement in predicting in-hospital intubation or mortality. SDI plays an important role on who acquires COVID-19 and its severity; but once hospitalized, SDI appears less important.