From a cancer-centric perspective, radiotherapy has been primarily viewed as a localised treatment modality, targeting cancer tissues with ionising radiation to induce DNA damage and cell death

Background: Radioligand therapy with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 represents an emerging treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Its clinical positioning relative to standard therapies remains under discussion. Objective: To compare overall survival (OS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), PSA response, and treatment burden across randomised trials evaluating [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARTA), Cabazitaxel, or standard of care (SOC). Evidence Acquisition: We conducted a meta-analysis of five randomised controlled trials, including 2073 patients with PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We assessed survival endpoints, baseline comparability, and treatment intensity. Evidence Synthesis: [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 significantly improved rPFS and PSA response. While modest overall, the OS benefit was more pronounced in taxane-naïve populations. Compared with Cabazitaxel, [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 was associated with similar or better survival despite shorter treatment duration and potentially lower cumulative toxicity and cost. Economic modelling suggests it could offer a more sustainable therapeutic option under typical willingness-to-pay thresholds. Conclusions: [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 shows clinical effectiveness and economic value in mCRPC, with potential advantages over Cabazitaxel and ARTA. Its use could be prioritised in early treatment lines. Patient Summary: This study suggests that PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy is at least as effective as other treatments for advanced prostate cancer, with potential benefits in terms of toxicity, duration, and overall cost.

Introduction: Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) alone may be effective in preventing disease progression and positively affecting overall survival (OS) in oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC). Objective: We systematically reviewed the current literature to analyse the biological rationale for integrating MDT into treatment strategies for OMPC and investigate the current evidence on its role in OMPC. Evidence acquisition: MEDLINE/PUBMED and the EMBASE Database were systematically searched to identify eligible reports published up to January 2024. The proceedings of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, European Society of Medical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Uro-Oncology Group, and American Urological Association annual meetings were analysed. Results: Eighteen studies published between 2014 and 2024 were selected for the analysis. The studies included 1058 patients treated with metastasis-directed radiotherapy. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of treatment-escalation-free survival between hormone-naïve patients treated with MDT alone and those treated with MDT and hormonal manipulation. By contrast, the combination treatment significantly increased both 2 year and 4 year disease-progression-free survival (DPFS) rates (p-values < 0.00001 and 0.006, respectively). In patients with castration-sensitive disease treated with MDT alone, the estimated 2 year and 4 year OS rates were 96.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.9–100%) and 89.1% (95% CI, 82.3–96.5%), respectively. The estimated 2 year and 4 year overall survival rates in the combination treatment group were 86.1% (95% CI 79.2–93.7%) and 74.8% (95% CI 64.6.3–86.5%), respectively. Conclusions: MDT alone is associated with promising outcomes in OMPC and represents a valuable, valid, and often preferable strategy. Combined with ADT improves significantly disease-progression-free survival, but its impact on overall survival remains uncertain. Given these findings, the decision to incorporate ADT should be tailored to individual patient characteristics and clinical context. Future research should integrate biomarker-based approaches to optimise MDT use and select the best candidates for a multimodal approach.

Objective: The optimal management of rectal cancer remains a subject of ongoing research. This meta-analysis of individual patient data assessed the benefit of chemoradiotherapy (fluorouracil-based) in local advanced rectal cancer: disease-free survival and overall survival. Methods: We pooled the data of 6145 patients from 24 studies of rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant radiotherapy with concomitant fluorouracil or capecitabine and surgery. The PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist was followed. Individual participant survival was reconstructed with an algorithm from published Kaplan–Meier curves. Results: The median OS was not reached; the mean survival time was 135.4 months (127.9–141.5). The median DFS was 176.9 months, and the mean disease-free survival time was 122.6 months (111.7–131.9). Conclusions: We provided a benchmark for future studies on rectal cancer treatment. The present results can be used in decision-making for locally advanced rectal cancer patients.

Objectives: Despite optimal local control obtained with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), data on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of local advanced rectal cancer patients are still equivocal. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pathological complete response (pCR), regression rate, DFS, and OS probabilities of rectal cancer patients treated with a second chemotherapy drug added to fluoropyrimidine and long-term radiotherapy. Methods: Computerized bibliographic searches of MEDLINE, PUBMED, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases (1970–2023) were supplemented with hand searches of reference lists. Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intensified chemotherapy with CRT to preoperative CRT and if they had patients with resectable, histologically proven rectal adenocarcinoma without metastases. Results: Eighteen RCTs (7695 patients) were analysed. Data on population, intervention, and outcomes were extracted from each RCT, following the intention-to-treat method, by three independent observers and combined using the DerSimonian and Laird methods. A chemotherapy with two drug and long-term radiotherapy CRT, compared to preoperative CRT (fluoropyrimidine and long-term radiotherapy), significantly increases the rate of pathological complete response (OR 1.37 (95% CI, 1.16–1.63) p = 0.0003) and the regression rate (OR 1.57 (95% CI, 1.16–2.14) p < 0.00001). Furthermore, it increases DFS (HR 0.87 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.95) p = 0.002 and OS HR 0.84 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.95) p = 0.007). The risk of severe adverse events (≥G3) is increased OR 1.96 (95% CI 1.35–2.85), p = 0.0005. Conclusions: In patients with resectable rectal cancer, intensified chemotherapy can reduce by 13% the risk of disease progression and by 16% the risk of death.