Jordi Rimola

Dr. Jordi Rimola

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 November 2021 in Journal of Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMaria Reig
Maria Reig
AFAlejandro Forner
Alejandro Forner
JRJordi Rimola
Jordi Rimola
JFJoana Ferrer-Fàbrega
Joana Ferrer-Fàbrega
MBMarta Burrel
Marta Burrel
JBJordi Bruix
Jordi Bruix

27 October 2025 in Journal of Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMaria Reig
Maria Reig
MSMarco Sanduzzi-Zamparelli
Marco Sanduzzi-Zamparelli
AFAlejandro Forner
Alejandro Forner
JRJordi Rimola
Jordi Rimola
JFJoana Ferrer
Joana Ferrer
JBJordi Bruix
Jordi Bruix

1 August 2019 in Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IOIngrid Ordás
Ingrid Ordás
JRJordi Rimola
Jordi Rimola
IAIgnacio Alfaro
Ignacio Alfaro
SRSonia Rodríguez
Sonia Rodríguez
JCJesús Castro-Poceiro
Jesús Castro-Poceiro
JPJulián Panés
Julián Panés

1 October 2019 in Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SDSilvio Danese
Silvio Danese
WSWilliam J. Sandborn
William J. Sandborn
JCJean-Frédéric Colombel
Jean-Frédéric Colombel
SVSeverine Vermeire
Severine Vermeire
SGSarah C. Glover
Sarah C. Glover
BFBrian G. Feagan
Brian G. Feagan
Vedolizumab is a gut-selective monoclonal antibody for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD). We performed a prospective study of endoscopic, radiologic, and histologic healing in patients with CD who received vedolizumab therapy. We performed a phase 3b, open-label, single-group study of 101 patients with at least 3 months of active CD (a CD Activity Index [CDAI] score of 220-450, a simple endoscopic score for CD [SES-CD] of 7 or more, 1 or more mucosal ulcerations [identified by endoscopy], and failure of conventional therapy) from March 2015 through December 2017. Among the patients enrolled, 54.5% had previous failure of 1 or more tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists and 44.6% had severe endoscopic disease activity (SES-CD scores above 15) at baseline. Participants received vedolizumab (300 mg intravenously) at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and then every 8 weeks thereafter, for 26 weeks (primary study) or 52 weeks (substudy, 56 patients). The primary endpoint at week 26 was endoscopic remission (SES-CD score of 4 or less); other endpoints included endoscopic response (50% reduction in SES-CD), radiologic remission (magnetic resonance index of activity score below 7), and histologic response (modified global histologic disease activity score of 4 or less). At week 26, 11.9% of patients were in endoscopic remission (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.3-9.8); at week 52, 17.9% of the patients were in endoscopic remission (95% CI 8.9-30.4). Higher proportions of patients naïve to TNF antagonists achieved endoscopic remission than patients with TNF-antagonist-failure at weeks 26 and 52. Higher proportion of patients with moderate CD (SES-CD scores, 7-15) achieved endoscopic remission at weeks 26 and 52 than patients with severe CD (SES-CD scores above 15). The proportion of patients with complete mucosal healing increased over time, with greater rates of healing in the colon than in the ileum. Remission was detected by magnetic resonance enterography in 21.9% of patients at week 26 (95% CI 9.3-40.0) and in 38.1% at week 52 (95% CI 18.1-61.6). At week 26, 24.4% of patients had a histologic response in the colon (95% CI 15.3-35.4) and 28.3% of patients had a histologic response in the ileum (95% CI 17.5-41.4). At week 52, 20.5% of patients had a histologic response in the colon (95% CI 9.8-35.3) and 34.3% of patients had a histologic response in the ileum (95% CI 19.1-52.2). There were no notable safety issues, including worsening of extraintestinal manifestations. In a phase 3b trial, we found that 26 and 52 weeks of treatment with vedolizumab (300 mg, at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and then every 8 weeks thereafter) induces endoscopic, radiologic, and histologic healing in patients with moderately to severely active CD. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02425111.

3 July 2025 in Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TKTorsten Kucharzik
Torsten Kucharzik
STStuart Taylor
Stuart Taylor
MAMariangela Allocca
Mariangela Allocca
JBJohan Burisch
Johan Burisch
PEPierre Ellul
Pierre Ellul
RFRoger Feakins
Roger Feakins
The current consensus guideline offers a comprehensive and practical guidance on the diagnostic and monitoring of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It provides recommendations on requirements for initial diagnosis, detection of complications, the use of monitoring tools in patients with IBD and diagnostics in specific situations, such as pregnancy, postoperatively and for cancer surveillance. The guideline is a joint project of the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organization (ECCO), the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology, the European Society of Pathology, and the International Bowel Ultrasonography Group under the leadership of ECCO.

4 August 2022 in Gut
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JRJordi Rimola
Jordi Rimola
JTJoana Torres
Joana Torres
SKShankar Kumar
Shankar Kumar
STStuart A. Taylor
Stuart A. Taylor
TKTorsten Kucharzik
Torsten Kucharzik
Endoscopy remains the reference standard for the diagnosis and assessment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but it has several important limitations. Cross-sectional imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and intestinal ultrasound (IUS) are better tolerated and safer. Moreover, they can examine the entire bowel, even in patients with stenoses and/or severe inflammation. A variety of cross-sectional imaging activity scores strongly correlate with endoscopic measures of mucosal inflammation in the colon and terminal ileum. Unlike endoscopy, cross-sectional techniques allow complete visualisation of the small-bowel and assess for extraintestinal disease, which occurs in nearly half of patients with IBD. Extramural findings may predict outcomes better than endoscopic mucosal assessment, so cross-sectional techniques might help identify more relevant therapeutic targets. Coupled with their high sensitivity, these advantages have made MRE and IUS the primary non-invasive options for diagnosing and monitoring Crohn’s disease; they are appropriate first-line investigations, and have become viable alternatives to colonoscopy. This review discusses cross-sectional imaging in IBD in current clinical practice as well as research lines that will define the future role of these techniques.