Religion can provide comfort, a sense of purpose and community support, but when it comes to mental health, it may also have a negative impact by triggering feelings of guilt, fear and social stigma. The aim of this study is to explore the medical students’ beliefs about possible impact of religion on mental health. A 16-item questionnaire was distributed online to 100 medical students with different religious backgrounds. It assessed beliefs, the frequency of religious activities and the perceived influence on mental health. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test (via GraphPad Prism 10.5.0 (774) software). The participants were young adults (61% aged 20–25), predominately female (59%) and Islam was the most represented religion (51%). 64% reported mental struggles and 76% had faced hardships that affected their mental state. Among these, 66% said hardships brought them closer to faith and 85% found religious refuge helpful. Also, 83% valued religious community support. On the other hand, 56% have reported frequent feeling of guilt related to religious practices and 41% believe that being too religious can affect mental health. Significant associations were found between level of religious practice and several beliefs, indicating differences in how more and less practicing individuals perceived guilt, religious coping, and the impact of hardships. Religion may provide psychological support, offering effective coping tools and emotional help. However, it may also contribute to mental distress through guilt and social stigma. These findings highlight the need for culturally and spiritually sensitive mental health care that respects each individual’s beliefs.

Mental health is shaped by multiple psychological, social, cultural, and spiritual factors. This narrative review aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the relationship between spirituality, religiosity, and mental health across the lifespan, with particular emphasis on psychological well-being, coping, resilience, and help-seeking behaviors, while considering both beneficial and potentially adverse associations. A narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Studies published between 2000 and 2026 were screened according to predefined eligibility criteria. A total of 52 publications, including quantitative and qualitative studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and narrative reviews, were included. The evidence was synthesized according to three life stages (childhood and adolescence, adulthood, and older adulthood), with an additional section examining help-seeking behaviors and access to mental health care across the lifespan. The reviewed evidence identified both beneficial and adverse mental health outcomes in relation to spirituality and religiosity. Beneficial outcomes included lower levels of depression, anxiety, substance use, and suicidal behaviors, as well as higher levels of resilience, emotional support, and life satisfaction. In contrast, negative religious coping and spiritual struggles were associated with higher levels of depression and anxiety, as well as delayed help-seeking behavior. Overall, the findings varied across study designs, populations, and cultural contexts. Spirituality and religiosity can influence mental health in both positive and negative ways throughout life. Understanding these relationships may help support more sensitive and individualized approaches to mental health care.

Background/Objectives: Parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often face sustained emotional, practical, and social demands. However, evidence from Romania remains limited, particularly regarding the combined assessment of caregiver burden, emotional distress, and coping strategies of parents. This exploratory study compared these outcomes between parents of children/adolescents with ASD and parents of typically developing children and examined whether coping patterns varied according to selected sociodemographic characteristics. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional comparative study in Târgu-Mureș, Romania, between 2024 and 2025. The sample included 92 parents: 46 parents of children/adolescents with clinician-confirmed ASD and 46 parents of typically developing children. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire, the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI), the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21), and the Strategic Approach to Coping Scale (SACS). DASS-21 data were available for 44 ASD caregivers and 46 controls. Between-group comparisons were performed using t-tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate. Results: The groups were comparable in sex, age, residence, number of children, and household size, but differed significantly in marital status and educational level. Clinically relevant caregiver burden (CBI ≥ 36) was more frequent among parents of children with ASD than among controls (30% vs. 17%), although this difference was not statistically significant. Parents of children with ASD showed trend-level higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, with small effect sizes, whereas stress scores were similar between groups. Coping patterns varied according to sociodemographic characteristics. Marital status was associated with aggressive coping, urban residence was associated with indirect and aggressive coping, and number of children was associated with seeking social support. Conclusions: Parents of children with ASD showed a higher proportion of clinically relevant caregiver burden and trend-level elevations in depressive and anxiety symptoms, while stress scores were comparable between groups. Exploratory adjusted analyses suggested that ASD caregiver status remained associated with caregiver burden and depressive symptoms after controlling for educational level and marital status. Coping strategies appeared heterogeneous and context-dependent. Given the exploratory design, modest sample size, and multiple comparisons, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary and hypothesis-generating.

The rapid expansion of digital technologies has created an unprecedented level of increased connectivity, yet the neurobiological mechanisms underlying these changes remain incompletely understood. This systematic review synthesizes the currently available evidence on neurobiological findings related to problematic internet use, problematic smartphone/social media use, and internet gaming disorder, with a focus on reward processing, attentional control, and emotional regulation. Across the included studies, recurrent findings suggested the involvement of fronto-striatal circuitry, salience- and reward-related regions, and executive-control networks. Alterations in large-scale brain networks, including the default mode, salience, and frontoparietal systems, were also reported, although the evidence base was heterogeneous and consisted largely of cross-sectional studies with modest sample sizes. Overall, the findings support a provisional neurobiological framework linking reward-related processing, inhibitory-control difficulties, and large-scale network alterations, but better-standardized studies are needed to draw conclusions.

Introduction: Problematic internet use has been increasingly associated with depression, anxiety and other psychiatric symptoms; however, its impact on attentional functioning has not been thoroughly researched. This cross-sectional study was conducted in Târgu Mureș, Romania, and aimed to examine the associations between problematic internet use, attentional control, and symptoms of depression and anxiety in adults, and to determine whether problematic internet use independently predicts attentional control after accounting for emotional symptoms. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 224 adults who completed an anonymous online survey between 1 January 2026 and 1 April 2026. Problematic internet use was assessed using the Compulsive Internet Use Scale-14 (CIUS-14), attentional control using the Attentional Control Scale (ACS), depressive symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), anxiety symptoms using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7), and eating disorder risk using the SCOFF questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, internal consistency analyses, Pearson correlations, group comparisons according to the CIUS-14 screening threshold, and multiple linear regression analyses were performed. Results: Problematic internet use was significantly associated with lower attentional control (r = −0.493, p < 0.001), higher depressive symptoms (r = 0.408, p < 0.001), and higher anxiety symptoms (r = 0.467, p < 0.001). In the regression model, problematic internet use remained the only significant independent predictor of attentional control (B = −0.597, p < 0.001), whereas depressive and anxiety symptoms were not significant after adjustment. Participants above the CIUS-14 screening threshold reported significantly lower attentional control and higher depression and anxiety scores than those below the threshold. Conclusions: Problematic internet use was associated with poorer attentional control and greater emotional symptom severity in Romanian adults. These findings suggest that problematic internet use may be linked to a broader cognitive–emotional vulnerability profile. However, because of the cross-sectional design, self-report measures, convenience sampling, and lack of detailed information on specific online activities, the findings should be interpreted cautiously. Longitudinal studies using objective cognitive measures and more detailed assessment of digital behaviors are needed.