Introduction: knowledge about AI in university professors allows them to integrate these technological tools into their teaching strategies and improve the quality of learning. Objective: to determine the sustainable factorial structure of the relationship dimension of an instrument to evaluate the level of knowledge about artificial intelligence in university professors. Methods: a cross-sectional metric validation study was conducted. A sample of 83 university professors was selected. An instrument on artificial intelligence for university professors was applied, consisting of 15 questions divided into three sections. Psychometric analysis was carried out to evaluate its validity and reliability. Results: the results show that Part 1 has an alpha coefficient of 0,77, Part 2 has an alpha coefficient of 0,65, and Part 3 has an alpha coefficient of 0,83. The alpha coefficients for each subscale (0,77 for Part 1, 0,65 for Part 2, and 0,83 for Part 3) indicate that the instrument has good internal consistency and that the questions within each subscale are related to each other. The χ2/gl ratio of 2,1 indicates a good fit of the model, and the GFI, NFI, and CFI values are close to 1, indicating a good fit of the model. Conclusions: the results of the present study support the validity, reliability, and sustainable factorial structure of the instrument on artificial intelligence for university professors, making it an appropriate tool to evaluate the level of knowledge about AI in university professors.

Beliefs about a social system help people understand and evaluate their environment and are related to their behavior within a society. When people believe that they live in a just social system and develop positive attitudes about the social and political environment, they experience greater satisfaction and well-being. This phenomenon is known as a palliative effect. Two theoretical approaches that explain support for social and political systems are the beliefs in a just world and system justification approaches. The objective of this review was to analyze the literature published between 2019 and 2023 that addressed the associations of beliefs in a just world and system justification with health-related well-being. The search yielded 2064 potentially eligible articles, 26 of which were ultimately selected. The results showed that beliefs in a just world are associated with a more positive perception of the world and better health outcomes. In addition, people with a greater propensity to justify the system experience higher levels of health-related well-being. This positive association is consistently observed across different social groups and contexts. These findings support the phenomenon of palliative effects attributable to beliefs in a just world and system justification.

There is a concerning increase in HIV infections worldwide. In Latin America, Chile is one of the countries that has experienced one of the highest surges. This translates to an increasing number of people needing hospitalization for disease management. Humanized care could be a strategy to improve treatment adherence, reduce stress, and promote empathy and compassion among nursing professionals. However, evidence has shown that discriminatory and stigmatizing treatment for this group continues to occur today

Based on the report of the “United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS 2019” and the low adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in risk populations in Chile since its implementation in 2019, a thought on the benefits that new technologies such as telemedicine currently have and how this influences access and adherence to therapy is presented, according to some of the current technological strategies implemented in the United States. On the other hand, Chile proposes telemedicine and telehealth guidelines, these are not aimed at improving access to therapy in risk groups. It proposed that extending telemedicine services to those who require PrEP could be beneficial in increasing adherence and access, also in decreasing HIV infections. Likewise, other countries in the region could use these innovations to get the same objective

Sexual and gender minorities are exposed to discrimination in the workplace and, in particular, in healthcare organizations. The design of policies and strategies that favor the insertion of workers is a challenge for organizations and it is where organizational learning plays a relevant role to produce changes in mentality and behavior towards workers belonging to sexual minorities. The generation of organizational learning on issues of labor inclusion allows the integration of all teams within the organization, improving the work environment, productivity, profits and problem-solving capacity. The challenge is to address the changes in today’s society and the new policies that protect and protect these diverse groups of health collaborators, without forgetting that individual learning does not guarantee organizational learning

Introduction: research on sexual and gender minorities has shown that stigmatization has significant negative effects. Research that compares the human rights situation between countries or continents is gaining more and more strength, however, this has been gradual, they are still little studied and are underrepresented. This group is considered a population at risk and a vulnerable group due to recurrent discrimination, stigmatization, inequities and injustice. Objective: to analyze the current ethical considerations involving research on sexual and gender minorities, and the protection granted to them as study subjects based on the ethical criteria proposed by Ezekiel J. Emanuel. Results: there is a lack of evidence in research that addresses ethical considerations in sexual and gender minorities, especially in those continents where they are prohibited from freedom of expression and are criminalized. Respect for individuals and protection of participants' welfare must remain the highest priority. Researchers are encouraged to maintain research on sexual and gender minorities even though there may be obstruction and delays in approval by the relevant agencies. Conclusion: researchers should orient their studies based on Ezekiel J. Emanuel's seven tenets, in addition to considering the suggestions made in this review. This will lead to methodologically valid research, maintaining the respect and value that community participants deserve