Biological drugs, including monoclonal antibodies, represent a revolutionary strategy in all fields of medicine, offering promising results even in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). However, their safety and efficacy have not been fully validated, highlighting the need for in-depth studies. Therefore, we provided a comprehensive systematic review of the intra-articular use of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of OA in animal models, reflecting ongoing efforts to advance therapeutic strategies and improve patient outcomes. A systematic literature search was conducted in December 2023 following the PRISMA guidelines, using the Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PUBMED databases. Out of a total of 456, 10 articles were included in the study analyzing intra-articular antibodies and focusing on various targets, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), nerve growth factor (NGF), interleukin 4-10 (IL4-10), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 5 (ADAMTS5), and matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP-13). Most studies administered the antibodies weekly, ranging from 1 to 10 injections. Animal models varied, with mean follow-up periods of 8.9 ± 4.1 weeks. The methods of assessing outcomes, including pain and morpho-functional changes, varied. Some studies reported only morphological and immunohistochemical data, while others included a quantitative analysis of protein expression. In conclusion, monoclonal antibodies represent a promising avenue in the treatment of OA, offering targeted approaches to modulate disease pathways. Further research and clinical trials are needed to validate their safety and efficacy, with the potential to revolutionize the management of OA and reduce reliance on prosthetic interventions.

Background: Patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty (THA), particularly those with hip osteoarthritis (OA), face an elevated risk of osteoporosis due to age and gender-related factors. Osteoporosis, indicated by low bone mineral density (BMD), can affect implant osteointegration, long-term stability, and increase the likelihood of periprosthetic fractures. Despite these risks, osteoporosis is often underdiagnosed and undertreated in THA candidates. While several studies have addressed this issue in Northern populations, data on Southern European cohorts, particularly Italian patients, remain limited. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of osteoporosis and vitamin D deficiency, as well as the rates of related treatments, in patients with hip osteoarthritis scheduled for THA. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study was conducted at Policlinico Universitario di TorVergata, Italy, involving 66 hip OA patients (35 men, 31 women; mean age 67.5 years). BMD was assessed at the femoral neck, total femur, and lumbar spine via DEXA, alongside vitamin D and PTH levels. Demographic data, ongoing anti-osteoporotic therapies, Harris Hip Score (HHS), and handgrip strength were recorded. Statistical analysis included t-tests and Pearson’s correlation. Osteoporosis was defined per WHO criteria, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: In this study of 66 patients with hip osteoarthritis (35 men, 31 women; mean age 67.5 years), women exhibited significantly lower bone mineral density (BMD) at the total femur (−0.98 ± 1.42 vs. −0.08 ± 1.04; p < 0.05) and lumbar spine (−0.66 ± 1.74 vs. 0.67 ± 1.59; p < 0.05) compared to men. Handgrip strength was also significantly reduced in females (17.1 ± 8.2 kg) versus males (27.3 ± 10.3 kg; p < 0.05). Vitamin D levels were below 30 ng/mL in 89.4% of patients, and 63.6% had levels below 20 ng/mL; PTH levels were elevated (>65 pg/mL) in 54.5% of cases, indicating frequent secondary hyperparathyroidism. Only 9 patients were receiving vitamin D supplementation and none were on anti-osteoporotic treatment. Conclusions: These findings highlight the frequent coexistence of low BMD, vitamin D deficiency, and reduced muscle strength in THA candidates, suggesting a pattern of musculoskeletal vulnerability that warrants clinical attention.