Atrial cardiomyopathy and remodeling play pivotal roles in the development of atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF), involving complex changes in atrial structure and function. These changes facilitate the progression of AF and HF by creating a dynamic interplay between mechanical stress and electrical disturbances in the heart. Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), initially developed for the management of type 2 diabetes, have demonstrated promising cardiovascular benefits, being currently one of the cornerstone treatments in HF management. Despite recent data from randomized clinical trials indicating that SGLT2is may significantly influence atrial remodeling, their overall effectiveness in this context is still under debate. Given the emerging evidence, this review examines the molecular mechanisms through which SGLT2is exert their effects on atrial remodeling, aiming to clarify their potential benefits and limitations. By exploring these mechanisms, this review aims to provide insights into how SGLT2is can be integrated into strategies for preventing the progression of atrial remodeling and HF, as well as the development of AF.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia globally. High-power, short-duration radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation (CA) for AF has recently emerged, reducing ablation times and enhancing patient tolerability with comparable efficacy and safety. While the benefits of general anesthesia (GA) for standard-power, standard-duration CA are well-established, data comparing GA to mild conscious sedation (MCS) for high-power, short-duration CA are limited. Methods: We included patients undergoing high-power, short-duration CA for AF under GA (group 1) or MCS (group 2). Procedural characteristics, success rates, and mid-term outcomes were compared. Results: In total, 131 patients, 47 in the GA group and 84 in the MCS group, were included. CA was performed for paroxysmal AF in 34 patients in group 1 (72.3%) and 68 patients in group 2 (80.9%). We found lower a mean total procedure time (100 [90–120] vs. 160 [130–180] min, p < 0.0001), lower radiation exposure (932.5 [625–1716] vs. 2445 [1228–4791] μGy, p < 0.0001 and 4.5 [3–7.1] 7.3 [4.2–13.5] min, p = 0.0003) and fewer RF applications (71 [54.8–83.8] vs. 103 [88.5–120.5], p < 0.0001) in the GA group. No major complications occurred. The 6-month AF recurrence rate was comparable between the groups (21.2% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.15). Conclusion: In patients undergoing high-power, short-duration RFCA for AF, the use of GA is associated with better procedural efficiency while simultaneously associated with an early recurrence rate comparable to MCS.

Background/Objectives: For many years, catheter ablation (CA) has been a cornerstone in atrial fibrillation (AF) rhythm control therapy; however, recurrence remains common. Multiple parameters have been proposed to quantify AF arrhythmogenic substrate, yet reliable predictors of long-term outcomes are lacking. To assess the value of non-invasive amplified P-wave duration (PWD), echocardiographic parameters, biomarkers, and electroanatomical mapping (EAM) were used in predicting left atrial (LA) fibrosis and arrhythmia recurrence after CA. Methods: We included 196 patients undergoing first CA for paroxysmal or persistent AF. Amplified 12-lead ECG PWD parameters [Pmax, Pmin and left atrial P-wave (LAP)], echocardiographic parameters, and biomarkers were assessed pre-procedure. We measured low-voltage areas (LVA, 0.2–0.5 mV) on high-density voltage EAM during sinus rhythm as a surrogate of fibrosis. Freedom from arrhythmia was evaluated at 6 and 12 months. Results: Patients with LVA on EAM had prolonged Pmax (148 vs. 135 ms, p < 0.0001), Pmin (111 vs. 101.5 ms, p = 0.0001), LAP (73.5 vs. 55.5 ms, p < 0.0001), larger LA diameter (p = 0.0002), area (p = 0.0365) and volume (p = 0.004), higher E/E’ (p = 0.0007) and E/A ratios (p = 0.037), more mitral regurgitation (p = 0.0315), and higher pro-BNP levels (p = 0.0094). Univariate analysis showed 12-month recurrence rates higher with greater Pmax, Pmin, LAP, LVA presence and extent; however, in multivariate analysis, only P-wave parameters remained independently associated with recurrence. Conclusions: Prolonged PWD parameters strongly reflect LA substrate (Pmax, Pmin) and independently predict post-ablation AF recurrence (Pmax, Pmin, and LAP). LA size, diastolic dysfunction, and mitral regurgitation were associated with LA fibrosis, while pro-BNP was associated with both fibrosis and arrhythmia recurrence. Integrating these simple, non-invasive markers into a multimodal assessment alongside EAM could improve pre-procedural risk stratification and guide individualized ablation strategies.