While anaerobic fitness is highly important for the performance in Olympic (amateur) boxing, the relationship between anaerobic performance metrics is poorly understood, and profiling boxers according to their anaerobic capacity is still a challenge. With the current study in elite amateur boxers, we aimed to compare the metabolic and cardiovascular responses to different maximal tests and the intercorrelations between performance indices (peak and mean power, duration of the test, punching frequency) of several all-out tests and their correlation to physiological response metrics (blood lactate and heart rate, HR). Twelve male Olympic boxers performed a battery of tests, including 30 s Wingate cycling and arm cranking, boxing bag punching, steep uphill treadmill running to exhaustion, and progressive treadmill running VO₂max test. Performance indices of different anaerobic tests were not closely correlated except for the duration of uphill running with body weight scaled (relative) peak and mean power produced during Wingate cycling test and absolute mean power of both Wingate tests. The number of punches landed on a bag per 30 s was associated only with relative power achieved during Wingate cycling test. HRpeak but not peak lactate response correlated strongly across exercise tasks. Finally, no correlation between the highly developed aerobic and anaerobic capacity, suggests a complex picture of the adaptation in elite amateur boxers.

Objectives: The objective is assessing whether the placebo effect can influence the time course of recovery following a football match. Methods: Using a randomized crossover design, eighteen youth male players (age: 15.3 ± 0.5 years, stature: 178.7 ± 6.4 cm, body mass: 65.3 ± 7.6 kg, playing experience: 8.6 ± 1.5 years) completed two friendly matches, followed by placebo (PLA; sham vagus nerve stimulation) or passive rest (CON). To assess the impact of PLA, countermovement jump height (CMJ), 10 and 20 m sprint times, heart rate variability (Ln-rMSSD), static and dynamic muscle soreness, and perceived fatigue were measured at pre-match, post-match, post-recovery, and 24 h post-match. Results: Our findings indicate that match play induced substantial fatigue, with significant deteriorations [p ≤ 0.002, small-to-large effect sizes (ES)] in CMJ, 10 and 20 m sprint performance, Ln-rMSSD, muscle soreness, and perceived fatigue at post-match and post-recovery compared to pre-match (except Ln-rMSSD between pre-match and post-recovery: p = 0.151, small ES). Although no significant between-intervention differences were found for any variable at any time point (p > 0.05), effect size analysis showed moderately lower perceived fatigue (r = 0.40) and dynamic soreness (r = 0.32) in PLA compared to CON at post-recovery. Conclusions: These findings suggest that while placebo stimulation did not affect performance or heart rate variability, it may support perceptual recovery. This holds relevance for both research and practice, as including placebo conditions can help isolate psychological effects from true treatment responses, while promoting positive expectations may enhance the perceived effectiveness of recovery strategies.

Monitoring the muscle mechanical properties and functions of female athletes throughout their training season is relevant to understand the relationships between these factors and to predict noncontact injuries, which are prevalent among female athletes. The first aim of this study was to determine whether female handball players’ passive stiffness of the hamstring muscles is associated with hamstring extensibility, strength of knee flexors and extensors, and lower limb stiffness. Additionally, the study monitored fluctuations in these factors over 25 weeks. The study utilized an isokinetic dynamometer to record hamstring passive stiffness, extensibility, and hamstring and quadriceps strength of 18 young handball players. Lower limb stiffness was determined from a countermovement vertical jump conducted on a force plate. The countermovement jump involved the calculation of the peak force during the eccentric phase and the mean force during the concentric phase. The results showed a positive correlation between hamstring passive stiffness and lower limb stiffness ( r = 0.660, p < 0.01), knee flexion and extension strength ( r = 0.592, p < 0.01 and r = 0.497, p < 0.05, respectively), and eccentric peak force ( r = 0.587, p < 0.01) during jumping. The strength of knee extensors increased significantly after 6 weeks, and hamstring stiffness after 12 weeks of training. In conclusion, the increased hamstring stiffness following training did not match other factors associated with injury risk. Therefore, preventing multifactorial injury risk requires a comprehensive approach, and monitoring one factor alone is insufficient to predict noncontact injuries in female handball players.