Tim J Peters

Prof. Tim J Peters

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

44Years (1983-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 October 2016 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FHFreddie C. Hamdy
Freddie C. Hamdy
JDJenny L. Donovan
Jenny L. Donovan
JLJ. Athene Lane
J. Athene Lane
MMMalcolm Mason
Malcolm Mason
CMChris Metcalfe
Chris Metcalfe
DNDavid E. Neal
David E. Neal
The comparative effectiveness of treatments for prostate cancer that is detected by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing remains uncertain. We compared active monitoring, radical prostatectomy, and external-beam radiotherapy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Between 1999 and 2009, a total of 82,429 men 50 to 69 years of age received a PSA test; 2664 received a diagnosis of localized prostate cancer, and 1643 agreed to undergo randomization to active monitoring (545 men), surgery (553), or radiotherapy (545). The primary outcome was prostate-cancer mortality at a median of 10 years of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the rates of disease progression, metastases, and all-cause deaths. There were 17 prostate-cancer–specific deaths overall: 8 in the active-monitoring group (1.5 deaths per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7 to 3.0), 5 in the surgery group (0.9 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.2), and 4 in the radiotherapy group (0.7 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 0.3 to 2.0); the difference among the groups was not significant (P=0.48 for the overall comparison). In addition, no significant difference was seen among the groups in the number of deaths from any cause (169 deaths overall; P=0.87 for the comparison among the three groups). Metastases developed in more men in the active-monitoring group (33 men; 6.3 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 4.5 to 8.8) than in the surgery group (13 men; 2.4 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.2) or the radiotherapy group (16 men; 3.0 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.9 to 4.9) (P=0.004 for the overall comparison). Higher rates of disease progression were seen in the active-monitoring group (112 men; 22.9 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 19.0 to 27.5) than in the surgery group (46 men; 8.9 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 6.7 to 11.9) or the radiotherapy group (46 men; 9.0 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 6.7 to 12.0) (P<0.001 for the overall comparison). At a median of 10 years, prostate-cancer–specific mortality was low irrespective of the treatment assigned, with no significant difference among treatments. Surgery and radiotherapy were associated with lower incidences of disease progression and metastases than was active monitoring. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research; ProtecT Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN20141297; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02044172.)

1 January 2004 in Neurourology and Urodynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KAKerry Avery
Kerry Avery
JDJenny Donovan
Jenny Donovan
TPTim J Peters
Tim J Peters
CSChristine Shaw
Christine Shaw
MGMomokazu Gotoh
Momokazu Gotoh
PAPaul Abrams
Paul Abrams

13 October 2016 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JDJenny L. Donovan
Jenny L. Donovan
FHFreddie C. Hamdy
Freddie C. Hamdy
JLJ. Athene Lane
J. Athene Lane
MMMalcolm Mason
Malcolm Mason
CMChris Metcalfe
Chris Metcalfe
DNDavid E. Neal
David E. Neal
Robust data on patient-reported outcome measures comparing treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer are lacking. We investigated the effects of active monitoring, radical prostatectomy, and radical radiotherapy with hormones on patient-reported outcomes. We compared patient-reported outcomes among 1643 men in the Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) trial who completed questionnaires before diagnosis, at 6 and 12 months after randomization, and annually thereafter. Patients completed validated measures that assessed urinary, bowel, and sexual function and specific effects on quality of life, anxiety and depression, and general health. Cancer-related quality of life was assessed at 5 years. Complete 6-year data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The rate of questionnaire completion during follow-up was higher than 85% for most measures. Of the three treatments, prostatectomy had the greatest negative effect on sexual function and urinary continence, and although there was some recovery, these outcomes remained worse in the prostatectomy group than in the other groups throughout the trial. The negative effect of radiotherapy on sexual function was greatest at 6 months, but sexual function then recovered somewhat and was stable thereafter; radiotherapy had little effect on urinary continence. Sexual and urinary function declined gradually in the active-monitoring group. Bowel function was worse in the radiotherapy group at 6 months than in the other groups but then recovered somewhat, except for the increasing frequency of bloody stools; bowel function was unchanged in the other groups. Urinary voiding and nocturia were worse in the radiotherapy group at 6 months but then mostly recovered and were similar to the other groups after 12 months. Effects on quality of life mirrored the reported changes in function. No significant differences were observed among the groups in measures of anxiety, depression, or general health-related or cancer-related quality of life. In this analysis of patient-reported outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer, patterns of severity, recovery, and decline in urinary, bowel, and sexual function and associated quality of life differed among the three groups. (Funded by the U.K. National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Program; ProtecT Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN20141297; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02044172.)

1 March 2004 in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSara T. Brookes
Sara T. Brookes
EWElise Whitely
Elise Whitely
MEMatthias Egger
Matthias Egger
GSGeorge Davey Smith
George Davey Smith
PMPaul A. Mulheran
Paul A. Mulheran
TPTim J Peters
Tim J Peters

1 January 2007 in Journal of Health Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TFTerry N. Flynn
Terry N. Flynn
JLJordan J. Louviere
Jordan J. Louviere
TPTim J Peters
Tim J Peters
JCJoanna Coast
Joanna Coast

1 September 2008 in Social Science & Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJoanna Coast
Joanna Coast
TFTerry N. Flynn
Terry N. Flynn
LNLucy Natarajan
Lucy Natarajan
KSKerry Sproston
Kerry Sproston
JLJane Lewis
Jane Lewis
TPTim J Peters
Tim J Peters