Meikang Wu

Dr. Meikang Wu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 January 2023 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MWMeikang Wu
Meikang Wu
HJHao Jiang
Hao Jiang
ZWZhiheng Wei
Zhiheng Wei
LWLi Wanchun
Li Wanchun
KYkuo yu
kuo yu
MYMeiying Yang
Meiying Yang
High grain yields of rice (Oryza sativa) under dry cultivation are primarily obtained through high levels of nitrogen (N) input. However, excessive inputs of N increase the risk of lodging. This study aimed to clarify the effect of N application rates on crop morphology, mechanical mechanisms of the stem, and chemical components in the basal stems of rice and their underlying mechanism in association with lodging resistance under dry cultivation. In this study, field experiments on rice were conducted under dry cultivation in early May to early October 2019 and 2020. Six rates of N applied at 0, 70, 140, 210, 280 and 350 kg ha−1 were set at a sowing rate of 150 kg ha−1 with Suijing 18 as the test material. The increased risk of lodging represented by lodging index (LI) and lodging rate with increasing N application was observed under both growing seasons. The plant height, basal internode length, particularly the second internode, and center of gravity height, which positively correlated with the LI, increased significantly with the increase in N application rates. In contrast, internode fullness and carbohydrate content of the basal second (S2) internode, which negatively correlated with LI, decreased significantly with increasing N application rates. A quadratic regression model between N application rates and grain yield showed that better grain yield could be achieved under an N application rate ranging from 210 to 228 kg ha−1. Therefore, the N application rate of (i.e., 210–228 kg N ha−1) could be recommended for the Suijing18 variety under dry cultivation in central Jilin Province for achieving high grain yield and great lodging resistance.

1 September 2024 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MWMeikang Wu
Meikang Wu
MNMin Nuo
Min Nuo
ZJZixian Jiang
Zixian Jiang
RXRuiyao Xu
Ruiyao Xu
HZHongcheng Zhang
Hongcheng Zhang
MYMeiying Yang
Meiying Yang
Straw return has important impacts on black soil protection, food security, and environmental protection. One year of straw return (S1) reduces rice yield and increases greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, the effects of successive years of straw return on rice yield, soil nutrients, and GHG emissions in the northeast rice region are still unclear. Therefore, we conducted four successive years of straw return (S4) in a positional experiment to investigate the effects of different years of straw return on rice yield, soil nutrients, and GHG emissions in the northeast rice region. The experimental treatments included the following: no straw return (S0), a year of straw return (S1), two successive years of straw return (S2), three successive years of straw return (S3), and four successive years of straw return (S4). Compared with S1, the rice yields of S2, S3, and S4 increased by 10.89%, 15.46%, and 16.98%, respectively. But only S4 increased by 4.64% compared to S0, while other treatments were lower than S0. S4 increased panicles per m2 and spikelets per panicle by 9.34% and 8.93%, respectively, compared to S1. Panicles per m2 decreased by 8.06% at S4 compared to S0, while spikelets per panicle increased by 13.23%. Compared with S0, the soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, NH4+-N, NO3−-N, available phosphorus, and available potassium of S4 increased by 11.68%, 10.15%, 24.62%, 21.38%, 12.33%, and 13.35%, respectively. Successive years of rice straw return decreased GHG intensity (GHGI). Compared with S1, the GHGI of S4, S3, and S2 decreased by 16.2%, 11.84%, and 9.36%, respectively. Thus, S4 increased rice yield and soil nutrients, reducing GHGI.

23 October 2024 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Zhihai WuZhihai Wu
Zhihai Wu
BXBei Xue
Bei Xue
SWShiwen Wang
Shiwen Wang
XXXu Xing
Xu Xing
MNMin Nuo
Min Nuo
PTPing Tian
Ping Tian
Under the one-season-a-year cropping pattern in Northeast China, continuous cropping is one of the main factors contributing to the degradation of black soil. Previous studies (on maize–soybean, maize–peanut, and maize–wheat intercropping) have shown that intercropping can alleviate this problem. However, it is not known whether intercropping is feasible for maize and rice under dry cultivation, and its effects on yield and soil fertility are unknown. A three-year field-orientation experiment was conducted at Jilin Agricultural University in Changchun city, Jilin Province, China, consisting of three cropping regimes, namely rice under dry cultivation–maize intercropping (IRM), sole rice under dry cultivation (SR), and sole maize (SM). All straw was fully returned to the field after mechanical harvesting. Rice under dry cultivation–maize intercropping with a land-equivalent ratio of 1.05 (the average of three years values) increased the total yield by 8.63% compared to the monoculture system. The aggressivity (A), relative crowding coefficient (K), time–area-equivalent ratio (ATER), and competition ratio (CR) value were positive or ≥1, also indicating that the rice under dry cultivation–maize intercropping had a yield advantage of the overall intercropping system. This is because the intercropped maize root length density (RLD) increased by 33.94–102.84% in the 0–40 cm soil layer, which contributed to an increase in the soil porosity (SP) of 5.58–10.10% in the 0–30 cm soil layer, an increase in the mean weight diameter of soil aggregates (MWD) of 3.00–15.69%, an increase in the geometric mean diameter of soil aggregates (GMD) of 8.16–26.42%, a decrease in the soil bulk density (SBD) of 4.02–7.35%, and an increase in the soil organic matter content (SOM) of 0.60–4.35%. This increased the water permeability and aeration of the soil and facilitated the absorption of nutrients and water by the root system and their transportation above ground, and the plant nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium accumulation in the intercropping system were significantly higher than that in monoculture treatment, further promoting the total yield of intercropping. This suggests that rice under a dry cultivation–maize intercropping system is feasible in Northeast China, mainly because it promotes belowground root growth, improves the soil environment, and increases the total yield of intercropping.

26 August 2025 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZJZixian Jiang
Zixian Jiang
MWMeikang Wu
Meikang Wu
ZWZilin Wang
Zilin Wang
LYLiqun Yao
Liqun Yao
DWDongchao Wang
Dongchao Wang
Zhihai WuZhihai Wu
Zhihai Wu
Combining straw return with nitrogen fertilizer application is an effective strategy to enhance farmland productivity, improve soil structure, and mitigate climate change. Although straw return practices are widely recommended in agricultural ecosystems targeting sustainable agriculture, few studies have investigated the combined effects of consecutive years of straw return and nitrogen-fertilizer interactions on rice yield, nitrogen use, and lodging resistance, as well as the potential interactions among these variables. To investigate the effects of consecutive years of rice straw return and nitrogen fertilizer inputs on rice growth, a straw return experiment was conducted in 2021–2022 in Northeast China. The test crop was rice (cv. Jinongda No. 667), with four nitrogen fertilizer levels: 0 kg/ha (N0), 125 kg/ha (N1), 150 kg/ha (N2), and 175 kg/ha (N3). Five straw-return treatments were applied: no straw (S0), straw return to the field for one year (S1), continuous straw return to the field for two years (S2), continuous straw return to the field for three years (S3), and continuous straw return to the field for four years (S4). Results indicated that under the same straw return year, the N3 yield, nitrogen accumulation, nitrogen use efficiency, and apparent utilization were the highest. Under the same nitrogen treatment condition, S1 significantly reduced yield, nitrogen accumulation, nitrogen use efficiency, apparent nitrogen utilization, and lodging index compared to S0. However, under N3 conditions, S3 did not significantly differ from S0. Both S3 and N3 enhanced nitrogen uptake, translocation, and accumulation in rice. Their significant interactive effect increased yield while simultaneously enhancing the lodging resistance and stem strength. The study findings highlighted the effects of years of straw return and nitrogen fertilizer application on crop yield and resistance traits. They further demonstrated that the combination of straw return and optimized nitrogen fertilizer inputs could improve resource utilization and result in a high-yielding and efficient crop population.

29 November 2025 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZLZichen Liu
Zichen Liu
ZWZilin Wang
Zilin Wang
GWGaoyuan Wu
Gaoyuan Wu
JCJunlei Chen
Junlei Chen
JHJingqi He
Jingqi He
MYMeiying Yang
Meiying Yang
Increasing grain production is crucial for national food security, and fertilizer management is one of the most effective ways to achieve this. In traditional agricultural production, excessive nitrogen (N) application often leads to reduced N use efficiency and increased environmental pollution. Compound slow-release fertilizers can effectively improve N use efficiency while still meeting the nutritional demands of rice. However, research on these compound slow-release fertilizers remains limited. The effects of fertilizer management measures (controlled-release fertilizer ratios and N fertilizer levels) on rice yield, material accumulation, photosynthetic characteristics, and N use efficiency are not yet fully understood. In particular, the relationships between yield and material accumulation, photosynthetic characteristics, and N use efficiency require further study. Therefore, this study was conducted in 2021 and 2022 using Jinongda 667 as the material, with three N fertilizer rates of 90 (N1), 120 (N2), and 150 kg ha−1 N (N3). Six controlled-release fertilizer ratios of sulfur-coated urea (SCU) and resin-coated urea (RCU) were tested: 1:0 (C1), 0:1 (C2), 3:1 (C3), 4:1 (C4), 5:1 (C5), and 6:1 (C6) (optimized in 2022 to three ratios: 3:1, 4:1, and 5:1, with traditional split-application fertilization (CF) added as a control). The results showed that the N3C5 treatment achieved the highest yield of 9246.7 kg ha−1 among all combinations of slow-controlled release compound fertilizer ratios and N levels. In 2021, under the same N gradient, yields followed the order C5 > C4 > C3 > C2 > C1, whereas the C6 treatment exhibited a declining yield trend across different N levels. The yield pattern observed in 2022 was consistent with that of 2021. Further comparisons of C3, C4, and C5 under different N levels with the traditional fertilization treatment (N3CF) indicated that, under the same N level, the C5 treatment produced significantly higher yields than the C3 and C4 treatments. Photosynthetic rates at various stages under the C5 treatment increased by 1.9% to 12.7% compared to the C3 and C4 treatments. The N2C5 and N3C5 treatments increased yield by 1.3% and 9.4%, respectively, compared with N3CF, with effective panicle numbers increasing by 6.7% and 11.1%, respectively. The N2C5 treatment reduced N application by 20% compared with N3CF, while significantly increasing N Apparent Use Efficiency (NAUE) by 56.6% and Agronomic N Agricultural Utilization Efficiency (NAE) by 41.8%. Therefore, applying a 5:1 controlled-release fertilizer at a N application rate of 120 kg ha−1 can reduce N use while enhancing efficiency. This approach provides a theoretical basis for green, high-yield rice cultivation.

8 November 2024 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZLZichen Liu
Zichen Liu
LWLi Wanchun
Li Wanchun
SGShujuan Geng
Shujuan Geng
RZRui Zhang
Rui Zhang
MDMan Dou
Man Dou
LWLei Wu
Lei Wu
There are few studies on how nitrogen (N) fertilizer application rates and transplanting densities impact rice yield, root distribution, and N use efficiency in the cold regions of Northeast China. This research involved a two-year field trial utilizing Jinongda 667 as the material. In 2021, three N split-fertilizer applications—T1 (6:3:1), T2 (5:3:2), T3 (4:3:3)—and two transplanting densities—D1 (30 cm × 13.3 cm) and D2 (30 cm × 20 cm)—were compared with the conventional cultivation mode (T0: 175 kg N hm−2, 6:3:1), whereby the N application mode most suitable for increasing density was explored. In 2022, four N application levels—0 (N0), 125 (N1), 150 (N2), and 175 (N3) kg N hm−2—were assessed under the same density treatment to analyze the yield, resource utilization efficiency, and root traits of Jinongda 667. The results indicated that when the transplanting density was 30 cm × 13.3 cm, the application of 5:3:2 fertilizer was more conducive to improving rice yield. Increasing planting density under reduced N input significantly enhanced both rice yield and N use efficiency. In contrast to the conventional cultivation method (D2N3), the treatment of increased planting density (D1N2) under reduced N input led to a 21.2% rise in the number of panicles per square meter and an 8.6% boost in rice yield. Furthermore, increasing planting density under reduced N input significantly enhanced the agronomic efficiency of N fertilizer, the apparent utilization rate, and the N harvest index. It also boosted the SPAD value, photosynthetic rate, and the utilization efficiency of light and N resources in rice. However, it was noted that root enzyme activity decreased. This study demonstrated that increasing planting density, combined with the N application mode of 5:3:2 and an N application rate of 150 kg hm−2, maximized resource utilization efficiency, optimized root absorption capacity, and resulted in higher yields.