Jean-Pierre Barbot

Prof. Dr. Jean-Pierre Barbot

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2016 in ISA Transactions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NDNadia Djeghali
Nadia Djeghali
SDSaid Djennoune
Said Djennoune
MBMaamar Bettayeb Bettayeb
Maamar Bettayeb Bettayeb
MGMalek Ghanes
Malek Ghanes
JBJean-Pierre Barbot
Jean-Pierre Barbot

13 February 2020 in IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Malek GhanesMalek Ghanes
Malek Ghanes
JBJean-Pierre Barbot
Jean-Pierre Barbot
LFLeonid Fridman
Leonid Fridman
ALArie Levant
Arie Levant
RBRobert Boisliveau
Robert Boisliveau
It is well known that the super-twisting algorithm is robust to matched perturbation but is sensitive to measurement noise. Contrarily to this, the classical linear algorithm is less sensitive to measurement noise but less robust to perturbation. To combine both the good accuracy of super-twisting algorithm with respect to perturbation and the good performance of linear algorithm with respect to measurement noise, this paper proposes a new differentiator/observer with a varying exponent gain ${\alpha}$ whose variation depends on the magnitude of measurement noise (high frequency signal). When the magnitude of measurement noise increases (respectively decreases) ${\alpha}$ tends to 1 (respectively tends to 0.5) and the proposed differentiator/observer behaves as a linear algorithm (respectively as a super-twisting algorithm). Thus, by one parameter ${\alpha}$ the differentiator/observer can take care of high frequency noise and matched perturbations. A complete stability analysis of the proposed differentiator/observer is provided. To highlight the applicability of the proposed methodology, the dedicated differentiator/observer is respectively validated on electropneumatic actuator and electric machine testbenches. These experimental results are compared to those of linear and super-twisting algorithms.

18 April 2017 in International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LELucien Etienne
Lucien Etienne
Stefano Di GennaroStefano Di Gennaro
Stefano Di Gennaro
JBJean-Pierre Barbot
Jean-Pierre Barbot


30 January 2019 in IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAmohamad Alaaeddin Alali
mohamad Alaaeddin Alali
YSYuri B. Shtessel
Yuri B. Shtessel
JBJean-Pierre Barbot
Jean-Pierre Barbot

1 October 2021 in Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CLChristophe Letellier
Christophe Letellier
JBJean-Pierre Barbot
Jean-Pierre Barbot
Controlling chaotic systems is very often investigated by using empirical laws, without taking advantage of the structure of the governing equations. There are two concepts, observability and controllability, which are inherited from control theory, for selecting the best placement of sensors and actuators. These two concepts can be combined (extended) into flatness, which provides the conditions to fulfill for designing a feedback linearization or another classical control law for which the system is always fully observable and fully controllable. We here design feedback linearization control laws using flatness for the three popular chaotic systems, namely, the Rössler, the driven van der Pol, and the Hénon–Heiles systems. As developed during the last two decades for observability, symbolic controllability coefficients and symbolic flatness coefficients are introduced here and their meanings are tested with numerical simulations. We show that the control law works for every initial condition when the symbolic flatness coefficient is equal to 1.