Background/Objectives: Previous studies evaluated the prognostic role of hematological parameters in predicting outcome in patients with infective endocarditis (IE). However, only a few studies evaluated the role of hematological parameters in patients undergoing surgery for IE. The aim of this study was to review our 20-year experience with the treatment of native (NVE) and prosthetic (PVE) valve endocarditis and to evaluate the role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), neutrophil-to-platelet ratio (NPR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil-to monocyte ratio (NMR), and systemic inflammatory index (SII) on early and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for NVE and PVE. Methods: All adult patients undergoing surgery for NVE and PVE at our institution between January 2001 and December 2022 were included in the study. Preoperative NLR, NPR, PLR, MLR, NMR, and SII were calculated using hemograms with complete blood count. Results: During the study period, 503 patients, 371 (74%) males, median age 65 (52–73) years, underwent surgery for NVE (n = 337, 67%) or PVE (n = 166, 33%). Patients with PVE had significantly more aortic annulus abscess (95 (57%) vs. 51 (15%); p < 0.001), longer CPB (180 (131–235) vs. 105 (84–145) min; p < 0.001) and aortic cross-clamping times (129 (96–175) vs. 82 (64–114) min; p < 0.001), and received more aortic homografts (47 (28%) vs. 28 (9%); p < 0.001) and postoperative pacemaker implantation (25 (15%) vs. 20 (6%); p < 0.001 compared to patients with NVE. Preoperative NLR was 3.7 (2.4–6.1), NPR was 23 (16–37), PLR was 159 (106–210), NMR was 8.4 (6.6–12), MRL was 0.41 (0.29–0.62], and SII was 790 (485–1396). NLR, NPR, and MLR were significantly lower in patients with NVE compared to patients with PVE and in survivors compared to non-survivors. Overall mean survival time was 12.2 ± 0.5 years, with patients with NVE having better early and late survival compared to patients with PVE. Patients with preoperative NLR < 3.8, NPR < 30.9, and MLR < 0.4 had significantly better mean survival time compared to patients with preoperative NLR > 3.8, NPR > 30.9, and MLR > 0.4, respectively. Conclusions: In patients undergoing surgery for IE, preoperative higher NLR, NPR, and MLR are associated with increased early and long-term mortality.

The treatment of complex aortic pathologies requires specialized techniques and tailored approaches due to each patient’s unique anatomical and clinical challenges. The European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) new guidelines identify the aorta as the body’s 24th organ and reiterate that multidisciplinary aortic teams are recommended for shared decision-making to determine optimal treatment strategies. Patients treated for conditions such as aneurysms, dissections, intramural hematomas, or penetrating aortic ulcers may develop complex forms over time, necessitating careful follow-up and timely corrective actions. Endovascular solutions can be favorable for older patients with complex anatomies and multiple comorbidities. However, when endovascular treatment is not feasible, hybrid treatments or open surgery must be considered if the patient’s condition allows it. The risk–benefit ratio of each procedure must be carefully evaluated; choosing the best intervention or deciding not to intervene becomes a critical and challenging decision. At our Cardiac Surgery Center in Verona, a multidisciplinary team with over 20 years of experience in treating complex aortic arch pathologies extensively discussed different cases of complex aortic pathologies treated with endovascular, hybrid, or surgical approaches, emphasizing the importance of considering both anatomical and patient-specific characteristics. The decisions and treatments were often challenging, and unanimity was not always achieved, reflecting the complexity of finding the best solutions.